Research ArticlesNo Access

STEREODYNAMICS STUDY OF THE REACTION Cl(²p_3/2) + C₂D₆ (v = 0, j = 0) → DCl + C₂D₅

YUFANG LIU

Department of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinjiang 453007, China

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

XIAOHU HE

Department of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinjiang 453007, China

Search for more papers by this author

YALI GAO

Department of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinjiang 453007, China

Search for more papers by this author

, and

JINFENG SUN

Department of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinjiang 453007, China

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219633610005621Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The product angular momentum polarization of the Cl + C₂D₆ → DCl + C₂D₅ reaction is calculated via the quasiclassical trajectory (QCT) method at the collision energy of 0.25 eV. A new London–Eyring–Polanyi–Sato (LEPS) potential energy surface (PES) is used in this reaction. There is a "late" barrier and a "deep" well on this new LEPS PES. The four polarization-dependent "generalized" differential cross sections (PDDCSs) are presented in the center-of-mass frame. In the meantime, the distributions of P(ϕ_r), P(θ_r), and P(θ_r, ϕ_r) are calculated. The calculations are in good agreement with the experimental data. In addition, the rotational alignment factors , , and in the stationary-target frame (STF) are also calculated.

Keywords:

References

S. A. Kandelet al., J. Chem. Phys. 105, 7550 (1996), DOI: 10.1063/1.472581. Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. A. Kandelet al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 265, 121 (1997). Web of Science, Google Scholar
P. C. Samartziset al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 324, 337 (2000), DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00611-4. Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. Bottoni and G. Poggi, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.) 337, 161 (1995), DOI: 10.1016/0166-1280(95)04130-X. Web of Science, Google Scholar
O. Roberto-Neto and F. B. C. Machado, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.) 580, 161 (2002), DOI: 10.1016/S0166-1280(01)00610-8. Web of Science, Google Scholar
T. P. Rakitziset al., J. Chem. Phys. 107, 9392 (1997), DOI: 10.1063/1.475236. Web of Science, Google Scholar
W. Liet al., J. Chem. Phys. 124, 011102 (2006), DOI: 10.1063/1.2150434. Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. A. Kandelet al., J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 2270 (1998), DOI: 10.1021/jp9801828. Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. A. Bechtelet al., J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5096 (2004), DOI: 10.1063/1.1647533. Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. A. Bechtelet al., J. Chem. Phys. 120, 791 (2004), DOI: 10.1063/1.1630961. Web of Science, Google Scholar
Z. H. Kim, H. A. Bechtel and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 3232 (2002), DOI: 10.1063/1.1493192. Web of Science, Google Scholar
W. R. Simpson, A. J. Orr-Ewing and R. N. Zare, Chem. Phys. Lett. 212, 163 (1993), DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(93)87125-M. Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. A. Kandel and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 9719 (1998), DOI: 10.1063/1.477642. Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. D. Chenet al., J. Chem. Phys. 118, 6852 (2003), DOI: 10.1063/1.1560956. Web of Science, Google Scholar
W. Y. Maet al., J. Chem. Phys. 117, 172 (2002), DOI: 10.1063/1.1481385. Web of Science, Google Scholar
L. Zhanget al., J. Chem. Phys. 112, 3710 (2000), DOI: 10.1063/1.480523. Web of Science, Google Scholar
U. Fano and J. H. Macek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 45, 553 (1973), DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.45.553. Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. J. Orr-Ewinget al., J. Chem. Phys. 106, 5961 (1997), DOI: 10.1063/1.473262. Web of Science, Google Scholar
W. R. Simpsonet al., J. Phys. Chem. 100, 7938 (1996), DOI: 10.1021/jp952627n. Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. J. Orr-Ewing and R. N. Zare, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 315 (1994), DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pc.45.100194.001531. Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. J. Aoiz, M. Brouard and P. A. Enriquez, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 4964 (1996), DOI: 10.1063/1.472346. Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. P. de Mirandaet al., J. Chem. Phys. 111, 5368 (1999), DOI: 10.1063/1.479797. Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Brouardet al., Mol. Phys. 89, 403 (1996). Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. J. Aoizet al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 264, 487 (1997), DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(96)01365-6. Web of Science, Google Scholar
N. E. Shaferet al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 212, 155 (1993), DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(93)87124-L. Web of Science, Google Scholar
C. H. Zhang, W. Q. Zhang and M. D. Chen, J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 8, 403 (2009), DOI: 10.1142/S0219633609004654. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
K. L. Han, D. G. He and N. Q. Lou, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 8699 (1996), DOI: 10.1063/1.472651. Web of Science, Google Scholar
L. J. Xuet al., Acta Phys. Chim. Sini. 14, 158 (1998). Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. F. Ramoset al., J. Chem. Phys. 118, 6280 (2003), DOI: 10.1063/1.1555633. Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. L. Wang, K. L. Han and G. Z. He, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 5446 (1998), DOI: 10.1063/1.476522. Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. J. Aoizet al. (eds.), Advances in Classical Trajectory Methods III (JAI Press, CN, 1998) pp. 121–181. Google Scholar
A. J. Alexanderet al., J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 7544 (1997), DOI: 10.1021/jp971123h. Web of Science, Google Scholar
G. M. Mcclelland and D. R. Herschbach, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 5509 (1987), DOI: 10.1021/j100305a025. Web of Science, Google Scholar