No Access

The Cognitive Force Equations

College of Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475-3102, USA

E-mail Address: Ted.randles@eku.edu

Search for more papers by this author

Lisa A. Gardner

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3100-8040

College of Business, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475-3102, USA

E-mail Address: Lisa.gardner@eku.edu

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Lee Allison

College of Business, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475-3102, USA

E-mail Address: Lee.allison@eku.edu

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649222500332Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The knowledge spectrum provides information about pragmatic knowledge types, which are placed on a spectrum based on their potential cognitive force. Based on the relationship between insight and Dretske’s three knowledge types, a conceptual framework for the equations is provided. These equations provide a shorthand method for determining the cognitive force of a specific pragmatic knowledge type. Together, the graphical and mathematical techniques of knowledge microanalysis, which is based on the knowledge chemistry approach, will be calibrated and refined. Two tools will be used to estimate cognitive force. These tools will enable organisations to develop models of their existing and proposed knowledge-intensive processes for analysis and refinement.

Keywords:

References

Conrath, DW, EV Dunn, WG Bloor and B Tranquada [1977] A clinical evaluation of four alternative telemedicine systems. Behavioral Science, 22(1), 12–22. Crossref, Google Scholar
Covington, MA [1998] Speech acts, electronic commerce, and KQML. Decision Support Systems, 22(3), 203–211. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Dretske, F. [1988] Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Elstein, AS, LS Schulman and SA Sprafka [1978] Medical Problem Solving. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Harvard University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
Eysenck, MW and MT Keane [1990] Cognitive Psychology. London: LEA. Google Scholar
Fetzer, JH and RF Almeder [1993] Glossary of Epistemology/Philosophy of Science. New York: Paragon. Google Scholar
Machlup, F. [1983] Semantic quirks in studies of information. In The Study of Information, F Machlup and U Mansfield (eds.), pp. 641–671. New York: John Wiley. Google Scholar
Nonaka, I [1994] A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Penzias, A [1989] Ideas and Information. New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
Polanyi, M [1966] The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul. Google Scholar
Prosch, H [1986] Michael Polanyi: A Critical Exposition. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
Ramaprasad, A and A Rai [1996] Envisioning management of information. Omega, 24(2), 179–193. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Randles, TJ and A Fadlalla [2004] Knowledge combustion: A knowledge chemistry approach and a description of the process of information dissipation. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 3(4), 373–383. Link, Google Scholar
Randles, TJ, L Allison and L Gardner (2021a). Knowledge requirements fulfillment analysis. Richmond, Working Paper. Google Scholar
Randles, TJ, CD Blades and A Fadlalla [2012] The knowledge spectrum. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 65–78. Crossref, Google Scholar
Randles, TJ, WJ Miller and L Sayeed [2017] The underlying sccob processes: Knowledge micro analysis, exploratory mapping processes, and action threshold management. American Journal of Management, 17(1), 47–56. Google Scholar
Randles, TJ, Z Zhang and WJ Miller [2018] The SccoB process: An integration of the exploitory and exploratory processes through a self-sustaining process of knowledge creation. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 9(4), 16–31. Crossref, Google Scholar
Randles, T and C Thachenkary [2002] Towards an understanding of diagnostic teleconsultations and their impact on diagnostic confidence. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 8(4), 377–383. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Randles, T, W Miller and C Blades [2011] Cataloging, measuring, and analyzing organization knowledge requirements and knowledge resources. Decision Sciences Institute Proceedings, 2201–2207. Google Scholar
Randles, T, Z Zhang and A Miller (2021b). The interaction of knowledge, the generation of cognitive force, and moment models. Richmond, Working Paper. Google Scholar
Simon, H [1985] The New Science of Management Decision. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Spiegler, I [2003] Technology and knowledge: Bridging a “generation” gap. Information and Management, 40(6), 533–539. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Stamper, R [1973] Information. London: Batsford. Google Scholar
Weick, KE and MG Bougon [1986] Organizations as cognitive maps: Charting ways to success and failure. In The Thinking Organization. HP Sims and DA Gioia (eds.), pp. 102–135. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar