No Access

On Nash equilibria in Eisert–Lewenstein–Wilkens game

Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Statistical Methods, University of Lodz, 41/43 Rewolucji 1905 St., 90-214 Lodz, Poland

E-mail Address: kbolonek@uni.lodz.pl

Search for more papers by this author

and

Piotr Kosiński

Faculty of Physics and Applied Informatics, Department of Computer Science, University of Lodz, 149/153 Pomorska St., 90-236 Lodz, Poland

E-mail Address: pkosinsk@uni.lodz.pl

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749915500665Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Landsburg method of classifying mixed Nash equilibria for maximally entangled Eisert–Lewenstein–Wilkens (ELW) game is analyzed with special emphasis on symmetries inherent to the problem. Nash equilibria for the original ELW game are determined.

Keywords:

References

1. J. Eisert, M. Wilkens and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3077. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. J. Eisert and M. Wilkens, J. Mod. Opt. 47 (2000) 2543. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. D. Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1052. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. L. Marinatto and T. Weber, Phys. Lett. A 272 (2000) 291. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. S. Benjamin, Phys. Lett. A 277 (2000) 180. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. A. Flitney and D. Abbott, Fluct. Noise Lett. 2 (2000) R175. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. L. Marinatto and T. Weber, Phys. Lett. A 277 (2000) 183. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. S. Benjamin and P. Hayden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (6) (2001) 069801. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. A. Iqbal and A. Toor, Phys. Lett. A 280 (2001) 249. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. J. Du, H. Li, X. Xu, X. Zhou and R. Han, Phys. Lett. A 289 (2001) 9. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. J. Eisert, M. Wilkens and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev.Lett. 87 (2001) 069802. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. A. Iqbal and A. Toor, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 052328. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. J. Du, H. Li, X. Xu, M. Shi, J. Wu, X. Zhou and R. Han, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 137902. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. S. J. van Enk and R. Pike, Phys. Rev. A 66 (2002) 024306. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. J. Du, X. Xu, H. Li, X. Zhou and R. Han, Fluct. Noise Lett. 2 (2002) R189. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. F. Guinea and M. A. Martin-Delgado, J. Phys. A 36 (2003) L197. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. A. Flitney and D. Abbott, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459 (2003) 2463. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. E. Piotrowski and J. Sladkowski, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42 (2003) 1089. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. J. Du, H. Li, X. Xu, X. Zhou and R. Han, J. Phys. A 36 (2003) 6551. Crossref, Google Scholar
20. L. Zhou and L. Kuang, Phys. Lett. A 315 (2003) 426. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. L. Chen, H. Ang, D. Kiang, L. Kwek and C. Lo, Phys. Lett. A 316 (2003) 317. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. C. F. Lee and N. F. Johnson, Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 022311. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. J. Shimamura, S. Ozdemir, F. Morikoshi and N. Imoto, Int. J. Quantum. Inform. 2 (2004) 79. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. S. Landsburg, Not. Am. Math. Soc. 51 (2004) 394. Google Scholar
25. A. Rosero, Classification of quantum symmetric non-zero sum 2×2 games in the eisert scheme, arXiv:quant-phys/0402117. Google Scholar
26. A. Nawaz and A. Toor, J. Phys. A 37 (2004) 11457. Crossref, Google Scholar
27. A. Nawaz and A. Toor, J. Phys. A 37 (2004) 4437. Crossref, Google Scholar
28. A. Iqbal, Studies in the theory of quantum games, arXiv:quant-phys/0503176. Google Scholar
29. A. Flitney and D. Abbott, J. Phys. A 38 (2005) 449. Crossref, Google Scholar
30. T. Ichikawa and I. Tsutsui, Ann. Phys. 322 (2007) 531. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. T. Cheon and I. Tsutsui, Phys. Lett. A 348 (2006) 147. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. N. Patel, Nature 445 (2007) 144. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. T. Ichikawa, I. Tsutsui and T. Cheon, J. Phys. A, Math. and Theor. 41 (2008) 135303. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. A. Flitney and L. Hollenberg, Phys. Lett. A 363 (2007) 381. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. A. Nawaz, The generalized quantization schemes for games and its application to quantum information, arXiv:1012.1933. Google Scholar
36. S. Landsburg, Rochester Working Paper No. 524, Rochester University, (2006). Google Scholar
37. S. Landsburg, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139 (2011) 4423. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. S. Landsburg, Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (Wiley and Sons, New York, 2011). Google Scholar
39. S. Landsburg and G. B. Dahl, Quantum Strategies, arXiv:1110.4678. Google Scholar
40. D. Schneider, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 095301. Crossref, Google Scholar
41. D. Schneider, J. Phys. A 45 (2012) 085303. Crossref, Google Scholar
42. Y. Avishai, Some topics in quantum games, arXiv:1306.0284. Google Scholar
43. K. Bolonek-Lasoń and P. Kosiński, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. (2013) (7), 073A02. Google Scholar
44. M. Ramzan, Quantum. Inform. Process. 12 (2013) 577. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. M. Ramzan and M. K. Khan, Fluct. Noise Lett. 12 (2013) 1350025. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
46. A. Nawaz, Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 (5) (2013) 050302. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
47. P. Frackiewicz, Acta Phys. Polon. B 44 (2013) 29. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
48. A. Nawaz, Werner-like states and strategies form of quantum games, arXiv:1307.5508. Google Scholar
49. A. Nawaz, J. Phys. A, Math. Theor. J. Phys. 45 (2012) 195304. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
50. A. Iqbal, J. M. Chappell, Q. Li, C. E. M. Pearce and D. Abbott, Quantum Inform. Process. 13 (2014) 2783. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. A Iqbal, J. M. Chappell and D. Abbott, Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 436 (2015) 798. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
52. K. Bolonek-Lasoń, General quantum two-players games, their gate operators and Nash equilibria, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2 (2015) 023A03. Crossref, Google Scholar
53. J. Nash, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 36 (1) (1950) 48. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
54. I. L. Glicksberg, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 3 (1) (1952) 170. Web of Science, Google Scholar
55. R. B. Myerson, Game Theory Analysis of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1997). Google Scholar