Research ArticlesNo Access

A first-order Lagrangian theory of fields with arbitrary spin

Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica “U. Dini”, Via S. Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italia

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887818500883Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The bundles suitable for a description of higher-spin fields can be built in terms of a 2-spinor bundle as the basic “building block”. This allows a clear, direct view of geometric constructions aimed at a theory of such fields on a curved spacetime. In particular, one recovers the Bargmann–Wigner equations and the $2 (2 j + 1)$ $2 (2 j + 1)$ -dimensional representation of the angular-momentum algebra needed for the Joos–Weinberg equations. Looking for a first-order Lagrangian field theory we argue, through considerations related to the 2-spinor description of the Dirac map, that the needed bundle must be a fibered direct sum of a symmetric “main sector” — carrying an irreducible representation of the angular-momentum algebra — and an induced sequence of “ghost sectors”. Then one indeed gets a Lagrangian field theory that, at least formally, can be expressed in a way similar to the Dirac theory. In flat spacetime, one gets plane-wave solutions that are characterized by their values in the main sector. Besides symmetric spinors, the above procedures can be adapted to anti-symmetric spinors and to Hermitian spinors (the latter describing integer-spin fields). Through natural decompositions, the case of a spin-2 field describing a possible deformation of the spacetime metric can be treated in terms of the previous results.

Keywords:

AMSC: 81R20, 81R25

References

1. V. Bargmann and E. P. Wigner , Group theoretical discussion of relativistic wave equations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 34(5) (1948) 211–223. Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. N. H. Barth and S. M. Christensen , Arbitrary spin field equations on curved manifolds with torsion, J. Phys. A 16 (1983) 543–563. Google Scholar
3. H. Blaine Lawson Jr. and M.-L. Michelsohn , Spin Geometry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1989). Google Scholar
4. D. Canarutto , Possibly degenerate tetrad gravity and Maxwell–Dirac fields, J. Math. Phys. 39(9) (1998) 4814–4823. Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. D. Canarutto , Two-spinors, field theories and geometric optics in curved spacetime, Acta Appl. Math. 62(2) (2000) 187–224. Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. D. Canarutto , Minimal geometric data approach to Dirac algebra, spinor groups and field theories, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 4(6) (2007) 1005–1040, arXiv: math-ph/0703003. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. D. Canarutto , Tetrad gravity, electroweak geometry and conformal symmetry, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 8(4) (2011) 797–819, arXiv: 1009.2255v1 [math-ph]. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. D. Canarutto , Positive spaces, generalized semi-densities and quantum interactions, J. Math. Phys. 53(3) (2012) 032302. Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. D. Canarutto , Two-spinor geometry and gauge freedom, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 11 (2014) 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887814600160, arXiv: 1404.5054 [math-ph]. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. D. Canarutto , Natural extensions of electroweak geometry and Higgs interactions, Ann. Henri Poincaré 16(11) (2015) 2695–2711, arXiv: 1407.4312 [math-ph]. Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. D. Canarutto , Overconnections and the energy-tensors of gauge and gravitational fields, J. Geom. Phys. 106 (2016) 192–204. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. D. Canarutto, Covariant-differential formulation of Lagrangian field theory, preprint (2016) 1–21, arXiv:1607.03864 [math-ph]. Google Scholar
13. D. Canarutto , On the notions of energy tensors in tetrad-affine gravity, Gravit. Cosmol. 24(2) (2018) 7 pages, arXiv: 1708.08109 [math-ph]. Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. L. Dabrowski and R. Percacci , Spinors and diffeomorphisms, Commun. Math. Phys. 106 (1986) 691–704. Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. E. G. Delgado Acosta, V. M. Banda Guzmán and M. Kirchbach , Bosonic and fermionic Weinberg–Joos $(j, 0) \oplus (0, j)$ $(j, 0) \oplus (0, j)$ states of arbitrary spins as Lorentz tensors or tensor-spinors and second-order theory, Eur. Phys. J. A 51(3) (2015) Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2015-15035-x Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. V. V. Dvoeglazov , Generalizations of the Dirac equation and the modified Bargmann–Wigner formalism, Hadronic J. 26 (2003) 299–325, arXiv: 02081592v2 [hep-th]. Google Scholar
17. L. Fatibene and M. Francaviglia , Deformations of spin structures and gravity, Acta Phys. Polon. B 29(4) (1998) 915–928. Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick and J. M. Nester , General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48(3) (1976) 393–416. Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. M. Henneaux , On geometrodynamics with tetrad fields, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 9 (1978) 1031–1045. Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. H. Shi-Zhong, R. Tu-Nan, W. Ning and Z. Zhi-Peng , Wavefunctions for particles with arbitrary spin, Commun. Theor. Phys. 37 (2002) 63–74. Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. W. Hurley , Relativistic wave equations for particles with arbitrary spin, Phys. Rev. D 4(12) (1971) 3605–3616. Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. W. Hurley , Consistent description of higher-spin fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29(21) (1972) 1475–1477. Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. J. Janyška, M. Modugno and R. Vitolo , An algebraic approach to physical scales, Acta Appl. Math. 110(3) (2010) 1249–1276, arXiv: 0710.1313v1. Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. E. A. Jeffery , Component minimization of the Bargmann–Wigner wavefunction, Aust. J. Phys. 31 (1978) 137–149. Google Scholar
25. H. Joos , Zur Darstellungtheorie der inhomogenen Lorentzgruppe als Grundlage quantenmechaniscer Kinematik, Fortschr. Phys. 10 (1962) 65–146. Google Scholar
26. D. S. Kaparulin, S. L. Lyakhovic and S. S. Sharapov , Lagrangian anchor for Bargmann–Wigner equations, in Geometric Methods in Physics. XXXI Workshop 2012, Trends in Mathematics (Springer, 2013), pp. 119–126, arXiv: 1210.2134v2 [math-ph]. Google Scholar
27. M. Lorente and M. A. Rodriguez , A Lagrangian of Bargmann–Wigner equations for massive particles of spin 2, J. Math. Phys. 24(12) (1983) 2823–2827. Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. R. Penrose and W. Rindler , Spinors and Space-Time. I: Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984). Google Scholar
29. R. Penrose and W. Rindler , Spinors and Space-Time. II: Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-Time Geometry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988). Google Scholar
30. R. Percacci , Gauge group of gravity, spinors and anomalies, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25(5) (1986) 493–507. Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. D. Shay , A Lagrangian formulation of the Joos–Weinberg wave equations for spin- $s$ $s$ particles, Il Nuovo Cimento A 57(2) (1968) 210–218. Google Scholar
32. S. Weinberg , Feynman rules for any spin, Phys. Rev. 133(5B) (1964) 1318–1332. Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. S. Weinberg , Feynman rules for any spin. II. Massless particles, Phys. Rev. 134(4B) (1964) 882–895. Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. S. Weinberg , Feynman rules for any spin. III, Phys. Rev. 181(5) (1969) 1893–1899. Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. A. Trautman , Einstein–Cartan theory, in Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2, eds. J.-P. Françoise, G. L. Naber and S. T. Tsou (Elsevier, Oxford, 2006), pp. 189–195. Google Scholar