Research ArticleNo Access

Beyond general relativity models, magnetosphere structure and dark matter stars

Instituto de Fisica del Plasma (INFIP), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Departamento de Fisica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, 141980, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna (Moscow Region), Russian Federation

E-mail Address: diego777jcl@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author

and

F. O. Minotti

Instituto de Fisica del Plasma (INFIP), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Departamento de Fisica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887819500646Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The magnetosphere structure of compact objects is considered in the context of a theory of gravity with dynamical torsion field beyond standard General Relativity (GR). To this end, a new spherically symmetric solution is obtained in this theoretical framework, physically representing a compact object of pseudoscalar fields (for example, axion field). The axially symmetric version of the Grad–Shafranov equation (GSE) is also derived in this context, and used to describe the magnetosphere dynamics of the obtained “axion star”. The interplay between high-energy processes and the seed magnetic field with respect to the global structure of the magnetosphere is briefly discussed.

Keywords:

AMSC: 83D05

References

1. V. D. Shafranov, Sov. Phys. JETP 6 (1958) 545. Google Scholar
2. H. Grad and H. Rubin, in Proc. Second United Nations Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Vol. 21 (United Nations, Geneva, 1958), p. 190. Google Scholar
3. L. S. Solov’ev, Sov. Phys. JETP 26 (1968) 400. Google Scholar
4. L. E. Zakharov and V. D. Shafranov, Reviews of Plasma Physics, Vol. 11 (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1986), p. 153. Google Scholar
5. P. Goldreich and W. H. Julian, Astrophys. J. 157 (1969) 869. Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. R. V. E. Lovelace, C. Mehanian, C. M. Mobarry and M. E. Sulkanen, Astrophys, J. Suppl. Ser. 62 (1986) 1. Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. D. A. Macdonald and K. S. Thorne, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 198 (1982) 345. Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. I. Okamoto, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 173 (1975) 357. Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 14(6) (2017) 799–810. Google Scholar
10. D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo, J. High Energy Astrophys. 16 (2017) 1–14. Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 14(7) (2017) 1750108. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. D. Alvarez-Castillo, D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo and J. Zamora-Saa, J. High Energy Astrophys. 13–14 (2017) 10–16. Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. N. Yokoi, Cross helicity and related dynamo, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 107(1–2) (2013) 114–184. Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo, Astropart. Phys. 50–52 (2013) 51–56. Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. M. Lyutikov, V. I. Pariev and R. Blandford, Astrophys. J. 597 (2003) 998–1009. Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. A. M. Beloborodov and C. Thompson, Astrophys. J. 657 (2007) 967. Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. J. J. Aly, Astophys. J. 283 (1984) 349; Astophys. J. 375 (1991) L61. Google Scholar
18. D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 (2012) 244026. Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. V. I. Arnold and B. A. Khesin, Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics, Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer Verlag, New York, 1995). Google Scholar
20. D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo, IJGMMP, XV, 376, doi.org/10.1142/S0219887819500130, arXiv:1812.04481. Google Scholar
21. D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo et al., work in progress. Google Scholar
22. Y. Kojima, Monthly Notices Royal Astron. Soc. 468(2) (2017) 2011–2016. Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. C. Thompson, M. Lyutikov and S. R. Kulkarni, Astophys. J. 574 (2002) 332. Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. David Kerlick and J. M. Nester, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48 (1976) 393. Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. K. Shibata and T. Magara, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 8(1) (2011), Article Id: 6, 99 pp. Google Scholar
26. F. Pacini, Nature 219 (1968) 145–146. Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. L. Del Zanna and N. Bucciantini, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479(1) (2018) 657. Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo, work in progress. Google Scholar
29. D. F. Torres, S. Capozziello and G. Lambiase, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 104012. Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. D. F. Torres, S. Capozziello and G. Lambiase, Class. Quantum Gravit. 17 (2000) 3171–3182. Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. S. Capozziello, C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari, IJGMMP 16(1) (2019) 1950008. Google Scholar
32. A. V. Astashenok, K. Mosani, S. D. Odintsov and G. C. Samanta, https://doi.org/10.1142/S021988781950035X. Google Scholar
33. A. A. Norton, P. Charbonneau and D. Passos, Space Science Reviews 186(1–4) (2014). Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. L. Sraibman and F. Minotti, Sol. Phys. 294 (2019) 14. Web of Science, Google Scholar