Research ArticleNo Access

Quantifying consciousness using quantum uncertainty in the brain

Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia V1V 1V7, Canada

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada

E-mail Address: mirfaizalmir@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887820500930Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

In this paper, we will argue that even though we cannot define consciousness, we can quantify it using free will, and quantum uncertainty is in turn a good measure of such a free will. We will also demonstrate that this quantum uncertainty increases with coupling, and thus with neurological complexity. Thus, we will be able to quantify consciousness using quantum uncertainty, and show that the higher amount of consciousness for complex organism would be a direct product of enhanced quantum uncertainty in brain.

Keywords:

AMSC: 97Q30

References

1. S. R. Hameroff and R. C. Watt , Information processing in microtubules, J. Theor. Biol. 98 (1982) 549. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. K. Godel, On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems, Reprint. edn. (Dover Publications, New York, 1992). Google Scholar
3. R. Penrose , in The Large, the Small and the Human Mind, ed. M. Longair (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997), pp. 93–143. Google Scholar
4. S. Hameroff and R. Penrose , Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory, Phys. Life Reviews 11(1) (2014) 39–78. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. S. R. Hameroff , How quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will Front, Integr. Neurosci. 6 (2012) 93. Google Scholar
6. M. Tegmark , Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes, Phys. Rev. E 61 (2000) 4194. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. G. S. Engel, T. R. Calhoun. E. L. Read, T. K. Ahn, T. Mancal, Y. C. Cheng, R. E. Blankenship and G. R. Fleming , Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems, Nature 446(7137) (2007) 782. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. V. Salari, J. Tuszynski, M. Rahnama and G. Bernroider , Plausibility of quantum coherent states in biological systems, J. Phys. Chem. Socids 306 (2011) 012075. Crossref, Google Scholar
9. V. Salari, N. Moradi, F. Fazileh and F. Shahbazi , Quantum decoherence time scales for ionic superposition states in ion channels, Phys. Rev. E 91 (2015) 032704. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. J. Wade , Changes of Mind, A Holonomic Theory of the Evolution of Consciousness (Albany State University of New York Press, 1996). Google Scholar
11. P. Pylkkanen , Can quantum analogies help us to understand the process of thought?, Mind Matter 12 (2014) 61. Google Scholar
12. L. P. Rosa and J. Faber , Quantum models of the mind: Are they compatible with environment decoherence? Phys. Rev. E 70 (2004) 031902. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. S. Kumar, K. Boone, J. Tuszynski, P. E. Barclay and C. Simon , Possible existence of optical communication channels in the brain, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 36508. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. E. Alfinito and G. Vitiello , Formation and life-time of memory domains in the dissipative quantum model of brain, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 14 (2000) 853. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. G. Vitiello , Dissipation and memory capacity in the quantum brain model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 9 (1995) 973. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. M. Jibu, K. H. Pribram and K. Yasue , From conscious experience to memory storage and retrieval: The role of quantum brain dynamics and boson condensation of evanescent photons, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10 (1996) 1735. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. C. I. J. Stuart, Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa , Mixed-system brain dynamics: Neural memory as a macroscopic ordered state, Found. Phys. 9 (1979) 301. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. K. H. Pribram , Brain and Perception (Lawrence Erlbaum, N. J. Hillsdale, 1991). Google Scholar
19. W. J. Freeman , Random activity at the microscopic neural level in cortex (“noise”) sustains and is regulated by low-dimensional dynamics of macroscopic cortical activity (“chaos”), Int. J. Neural Syst. 7 (1996) 473. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. E. Pessa and G. Vitiello , Quantum noise, entanglement and chaos in the quantum field theory of mind/brain states, Mind Matter 1 (2003) 59. Google Scholar
21. E. Pessa and G. Vitiello , Quantum noise induced entanglement and chaos in the dissipative quantum model of brain, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 18 (2004) 841. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. E. H. Walker , Mathematical Biosciences 7 (1970) 131. Crossref, Google Scholar
23. H. P. Stapp , Quantum theory and the role of mind in nature, Found. Phys. 31 (2001) 1465. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. M. P. A. Fisher , Quantum Cognition: The possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain, Ann. Phys. 362 (2015) 593. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. V. I. Sbitnev , Quantum consciousness in warm, wet, and noisy brain, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 30 (2016) 1650329. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. M. Ohya , Complexity in quantum system and its application to brain function, eds. T. Hida and K. Sait , Quantum Information II (World Scientifici 1999), pp. 149. Google Scholar