In this paper, we have studied the spectra of strange particles in pp collision at $\sqrt{s}$ $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.9 TeV by using different simulation models, EPOS-1.99, SIBYLL-2.3c, QGSJETII-04 and EPOS-LHC. The transverse momentum and rapidity distribution in the $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ range of $0 < p_{T} < 10$ $0 < p_{T} < 10$ GeV/c and $0 < p_{T} < 2$ $0 < p_{T} < 2$ GeV/c, respectively, are investigated for the strange particles, $K_{s}^{o}$ $K_{s}^{o}$ , $Λ$ $Λ$ , $Ξ^{-}$ $Ξ^{-}$ . Similarly, a comparative study is done for the ratio of $Λ / K_{s}^{o}$ $Λ / K_{s}^{o}$ and $Ξ^{-} / Λ$ $Ξ^{-} / Λ$ as a function of transverse momentum and rapidity. The validity of simulation models is tested by comparing simulation results to the CMS experimental data at $\sqrt{s}$ $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.9 TeV. For $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ distributions, the EPOS-LHC model in the $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ range $p_{T} < 0.3$ $p_{T} < 0.3$ GeV/c, $p_{T} > 8$ $p_{T} > 8$ GeV/c and in $3.6 < p_{T} < 3.8$ $3.6 < p_{T} < 3.8$ GeV/c while EPOS-1.99 model in the $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ range $2.5 < p_{T} < 2.8$ $2.5 < p_{T} < 2.8$ GeV/c and QGSJETII-04 model in the $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ range $2.5 < p_{T} < 2.8$ $2.5 < p_{T} < 2.8$ GeV/c as well as, $3.6 < p_{T} < 3.8$ $3.6 < p_{T} < 3.8$ GeV/c explain the experimental data well. For the, $Λ / K_{s}^{o}$ $Λ / K_{s}^{o}$ and $Ξ^{-} / Λ$ $Ξ^{-} / Λ$ versus transverse momentum distributions, EPOS-LHC model in the $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ range of, $2.4 < p_{T} < 2.6$ $2.4 < p_{T} < 2.6$ GeV/c and $1.6 < p_{T} < 1.8$ $1.6 < p_{T} < 1.8$ GeV/c, EPOS-1.99 model in the $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ range, $1.7 < p_{T} < 2.2$ $1.7 < p_{T} < 2.2$ GeV/c, SIBYLL-2.3c model in the $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ range, $1.4 < p_{T} < 1.6$ $1.4 < p_{T} < 1.6$ GeV/c and QGSJETII-04 model in the $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ range $0.4 < p_{T} < 0.6$ $0.4 < p_{T} < 0.6$ GeV/c explain the experimental data very well. Similarly, for $Λ / K_{s}^{o}$ $Λ / K_{s}^{o}$ and $Ξ^{-} / Λ$ $Ξ^{-} / Λ$ versus rapidity distribution QGSJETII-04 predictions in the rapidity region, $0.4 < | y | < 0.6$ $0.4 < | y | < 0.6$ , $1.4 < | y | < 1.6$ $1.4 < | y | < 1.6$ , and $| y | > 1.8$ $| y | > 1.8$ , while EPOS-LHC model in the region, $| y | > 1.8$ $| y | > 1.8$ , very well explained the experimental data. Although good comparison of the models predictions with the experimental data is observed, none of them completely describe the experimental data the spectra of strange particles over the entire $p_{T}$ $p_{T}$ and $y$ $y$ range.

Keywords:

References

1. E. V. Shuryak et al., Phys. Rep. 61, 71 (1980). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
2. WA97 Collab. (E. Andersen et al.), Phys. Lett. B. 449, 401 (1999). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
3. NA49 Collab. (S. V. Afanasiev et al.), Phys. Lett. B. 538, 275 (2002). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. NA57 Collab. (F. Antinori et al.), Phys. Lett. B. 595, 68 (2004). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. STAR Collab. (B. I. Abelev et al.), Phys. Rev. C. 77, 044908 (2008). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. ALICE Collab. (B. I. Abelev et al.), Phys. Lett. B. 728, 216 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
7. ALICE Collab. (J. Adam et al.), Nature Phys. Lett. 13, 535 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
8. P. Koch et al., Phys. Rep. 142, 167 (1986). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
9. N. Armesto et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35, 054001 (2008). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. K. Werner et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 230, 012026 (2010). Crossref, Google Scholar
11. Q.-D. Zhou et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 212 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
12. Q. Ali et al., Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 109, 507 (2019). Crossref, Google Scholar
13. M. Ajaz and Maryam, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950148 (2019). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
14. Q. Ali et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950120 (2019). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
15. M. Ajaz et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950100 (2019). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
16. Y. Ali et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950078 (2019). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
17. M. Ajaz et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950090 (2019). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
18. CMS Collab. (V. Khachatryan et al.), JHEP 2011(05), 064 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. P. K. Werner, How to relate particle physics and air shower: The EPOS model, Proc. of the 31th ICRC (LODZ, 2009). Google Scholar
20. A. B. Kaidalov and K. A. Ter-Martirosyan, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 39, 979 (1984). Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. F. Riehn et al., EPJ Web Conf. 99, 12001 (2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
22. H. J. Drescher et al., Phys. Rep. 350, 93 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
23. M. Hladik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3506 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
24. W. D. Apel et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36, 035201 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. S. Ostapchenko, Nucl. Phys. B-Proc. Suppl. 151, 143 (2006). Crossref, ADS, Google Scholar

Vol. 35, No. 05

Metrics

Downloaded 23 times

History

Received 4 May 2019

Revised 23 August 2019

Accepted 23 August 2019

Published: 9 October 2019

Keywords

PDF download

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Distribution of strange particles transverse momentum and rapidity in high energy proton–proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.9 TeV at LHC

Abstract

References

Study of transverse momentum and nuclear modification factors distribution of charged particles produced in pp and Pb–Pb collisions at ${\sqrt{s}}_{N N} = 2.76$ TeV and 5.02TeV

Transverse momentum and nuclear modification factor distributions of charged particles in p + Pb and p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}$ = 5.02 TeV

Transverse energy and charged particle production in heavy-ion collisions: From RHIC to LHC

Comparison study of the $p_{T}$ distributions of the charged particles in p–Pb interactions at LHC energies

Multiplicity dependencies of midrapidity transverse momentum spectra of identified charged particles in $p + p$ collisions at ${(s)}^{1 / 2} = 13$ TeV at LHC

Novel collective phenomena in high-energy proton–proton and proton–nucleus collisions

Characterization of Argon Plasma by Use of Optical Emission Spectroscopy and Langmuir Probe Measurements

The production of $π^{\pm}$ , $K^{\pm}$ , $p$ and $\bar{p}$ in p–Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}$ = 5.02 TeV

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Distribution of strange particles transverse momentum and rapidity in high energy proton–proton collisions at √ss<math altimg="eq-00001.gif" display="inline"><msqrt><mrow><mi>s</mi></mrow></msqrt></math> = 0.9 TeV at LHC

Abstract

Recommended

Study of transverse momentum and nuclear modification factors distribution of charged particles produced in pp and Pb–Pb collisions at s NN = 2.76TeV and 5.02TeV

Transverse momentum and nuclear modification factor distributions of charged particles in p + Pb and p+p collisions at s NN = 5.02 TeV