No Access

CONSTRAINED POTENTIAL: A CHARACTERIZATION OF MEXICAN MICROENTERPRISES

ANA NEGRETE

Southern Oregon University & University of Guanajuato, Department of Economics, Ashland, Oregon 97520, USA

https://doi.org/10.1142/S108494672250011XCited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Firm-level data spanning from 1994 to 2012 is used to investigate the apparent stagnation of Mexican microenterprises. The existence and nature of constraints are studied by estimating the empirical probability of a business’s success. A performance index is defined based on firm levels of capital stock and monthly profits. The predicted values are used to classify all microenterprises into one of three categories: upper, middle, or lower segment. Overall, the study identifies evidence of constrained productivity and capital misallocation, as well as the plausibility of cost-effective interventions. Specifically, microenterprises from the middle segment face substantial external constraints and their total share increased from 16 to 22 percent over time. The monthly marginal returns average 30 percent across lower-segment firms and 1 percent across those in the upper segment. Finally, the differences in monthly profits among segments are explored using the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method.

Keywords:

References

Becker, D (2018). Heterogeneous firms and informality: The effects of trade liberalization on labor markets. Oxford Economic Papers, 70(1), 47–72. Crossref, Google Scholar
Belsley, DA, E Kuh and RE Welsch (1980). Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley. Crossref, Google Scholar
Bennett, J and M Rablen (2015). Self-employment, wage employment and informality in a developing economy. Oxford Economic Papers, 67.2, 227–44. Crossref, Google Scholar
Blinder, AS (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 436–55. Crossref, Google Scholar
Cepeda, L and L Ramos (2015). Patterns of TFP growth in Mexico: 1991–2011. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 34, 398–420. Crossref, Google Scholar
Cunningham, W and W Maloney (1998). Heterogeneity among Mexico’s microenterprises: An application of factor and cluster analysis. World Bank Publications. Google Scholar
Coad, A and S Srhoj (2019). Catching gazelles with a lasso: Big data techniques for the prediction of high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 1–25. Google Scholar
De Mel, S, D McKenzie and C Woodruff (2009). Measuring microenterprise profits: Must we ask how the sausage is made? Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 19–31. Crossref, Google Scholar
Dodlova, M, K Göbel, M Grimm and J Lay (2015). Constrained firms, not subsistence activities: Evidence on capital returns and accumulation in Peruvian microenterprises. Labor Economics, 33, 94–110. Crossref, Google Scholar
Grimm, M, P Knorringa and J Lay (2012). Constrained gazelles: High potentials in West Africa’s informal economy. World Development, 40(7), 1352–68. Crossref, Google Scholar
Grimm, M, J Krueger and J Lay (2011a). Barriers to entry and returns to capital in informal activities: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Review of Income and Wealth, 57(s1), 27–53. Crossref, Google Scholar
Grimm, M, R Van der Hoeven and J Lay (2011b). Unlocking potential: Tackling economic, institutional and social constraints of informal entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. Main findings and policy conclusions. World Bank. Google Scholar
Grover Goswami, A, D Medvedev and E Olafsen (2019). High-growth firms: Facts, fiction and policy options for emerging economies. World Bank. Google Scholar
Hanson, GH (2010). Why isn’t Mexico rich? Journal of Economic Literature, 48(4), 987–1004. Crossref, Google Scholar
Harris, JR and MP Todaro (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis. The American Economic Review, 126–42. Google Scholar
Lewis, WA (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–91. Crossref, Google Scholar
Li, Y and M Rama (2015). Firm dynamics, productivity growth and job creation in developing countries: The role of micro- and small enterprises. The World Bank Research Observer, 30(1), 3–38. Crossref, Google Scholar
McKenzie, D and D Sansone (2019). Predicting entrepreneurial success is hard: Evidence from a business plan competition in Nigeria. Journal of Development Economics, 141, 102369. Crossref, Google Scholar
McKenzie, D and C Woodruff (2008). Experimental evidence on returns to capital and access to finance in Mexico. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(3), 457–82. Crossref, Google Scholar
McKenzie, D and C Woodruff (2006). Do entry costs provide an empirical basis for poverty traps? Evidence from Mexican microenterprises. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(1), 3–42. Crossref, Google Scholar
Moll, B (2014). Productivity losses from financial frictions: Can self-financing undo capital misallocation? The American Economic Review, 104(10), 3186–221. Crossref, Google Scholar
Morris, MH, DF Kuratko, DB Audretsch and S Santos (2020). Overcoming the liability of poorness: Disadvantage, fragility and the poverty entrepreneur. Small Business Economics, 1–15. Google Scholar
Morris, MH, X Neumeyer, Y Jang and DF Kuratk (2018). Distinguishing types of entrepreneurial ventures: An identity-based perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(3), 453–74. Crossref, Google Scholar
Nichter, S and L Goldmark (2009). Small firm growth in developing countries. World Development, 37(9), 1453–64. Crossref, Google Scholar
Oaxaca, R (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 693–709. Crossref, Google Scholar
Siba, E (2015). Returns to physical capital in Ethiopia: Comparative analysis of formal and informal firms. World Development, 68, 215–29. Crossref, Google Scholar