ArticlesNo Access

Noncovalently copper-porphyrin functionalized reduced graphene oxide for sensitive electrochemical detection of dopamine

Department of Chemistry, The Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell Technology of Guangdong Province, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, China

Search for more papers by this author

Jian Wang

Department of Applied Physics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

Search for more papers by this author

Hui-Qing Yuan

Department of Chemistry, The Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell Technology of Guangdong Province, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

Search for more papers by this author

Hui-Shi Guo

College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, China

Search for more papers by this author

Xiao Ying

Department of Applied Physics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

Search for more papers by this author

Hao Zhang

Department of Chemistry, The Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell Technology of Guangdong Province, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Hai-Yang Liu

Department of Chemistry, The Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell Technology of Guangdong Province, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

E-mail Address: chhyliu@scut.edu.cn

Correspondence to: Hai-Yang Liu, tel.: +86-20-22236805, fax: +86-20-22236805

SPP full member in good standing

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1088424618500761Cited by:11 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The nanocomposite of an electron-deficient flat tetrakis-(ethoxycarbonyl) porphyrin copper(II) (Cu-TECP) and reduced grapheme oxide (RGO) was prepared and used for electrochemical detection of dopamine (DA). The prepared nanocomposite was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, FT-IR spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Electrochemical studies of the modified glass carbon electrode (GCE) were carried out by the cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammograms (DPV) methods. The RGO/Cu-TECP/GCE exhibited enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards the detection of dopamine (DA). The detection limit was 0.58 μM, while the linear range was from 2 to 200 μM ( $R^{2} =$ $R^{2} =$ 0.997).

Dedicated to Professor Naisheng Chen on the occasion of his 80th birthday

Keywords:

Most comprehensive & up-to-date research on PORPHYRINS
Handbook of Porphyrin Science now available in 46 volumes

References

1. Diaz-Diestra D, Thapa B, Beltran-Huarac J, Weiner BR and Morell G. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017; 87: 693–700. Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. Lin YK and Yeh YC. Anal. Chem. 2017; 89: 11178–11182. Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. Kong B, Zhu AW, Luo YP, Tian Y, Yu YY and Shi GY. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2011; 50: 1837–1840. Google Scholar
4. Rasheed PA and Lee JS. Microchim. Acta 2017; 184: 1239–1266. Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. Li XC, Pan JB, Yang F, Feng J, Mo JY and Chen ZG. Microchim. Acta 2011; 174: 123–130. Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. Syslova K, Rambousek L, Kuzma M, Najmanova V, Bubenikova-Valesova V, Slamberova R and Kacer P. J. Chromatogr. A 2011; 1218: 3382–3391. Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. Lin YH, Chen CE, Wang CY, Pu F, Ren JS and Qu XG. Chem Commun 2011; 47: 1181–1183. Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. Gao WY, Qi LM, Liu ZY, Majeed S, Kitte SA and Xu GB. Sens. Actuators, B 2017; 238: 468–472. Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. Baluta S, Malecha K, Zając D, Sołoducho J and Cabaj J. Sens. Actuators, B 2017; 252: 803–812. Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. Chen DD, Tian CH, Li XY, Li Z, Han ZH, Zhai CD, Quan Y, Cui RJ and Zhang GH. Microchim. Acta 2018; 185: 98–104 Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. Xu GY, Jarjes ZA, Desprez V, Kilmartin PA and Travas-Sejdic J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018; 107: 184–191. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. Jothi L, Neogi S, Jaganathan SK and Nageswaran G. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018; 105: 236–242. Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. Zou J, Wu SL, Liu Y, Sun YJ, Cao Y, Hsu JP, Shen Wee AT and Jiang JZ. Carbon 2018; 130: 652–663. Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. Peltola E, Sainio S, Holt KB, Palomaki T, Koskinen J and Laurila T. Anal. Chem. 2018; 90: 1408–1416. Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. Wu BN, Miao CC, Yu LL, Wang ZY, Huang C and Jia NQ. Sens. Actuators, B 2014; 195: 22–27. Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. Sharma VV, Gualandi I, Vlamidis Y and Tonelli D. Electrochim. Acta 2017; 246: 415–423. Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Fu XM, Tan XR, Yuan R and Chen SH. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017; 90: 61–68. Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. Yan XY, Gu Y, Li C, Zheng B, Li YR, Zhang TT, Zhang ZQ and Yang M. Sens. Actuators, B 2018; 257: 936–943. Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. Zhang TT, Gu Y, Li C, Yan XY, Lu NN, Liu H, Zhang ZQ and Zhang H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017; 9: 37991–37999. Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. Li CK, Wu ZL, Yang H, Deng L and Chen XQ. Sens. Actuators, B 2017; 251: 446–454. Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. Wan S, Bi HC, Zhou YL, Xie X, Su S, Yin KB and Sun LT. Carbon 2017; 114: 209–216. Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. Yun QB, Lu QP, Zhang X, Tan CL and Zhang H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2018; 57: 626–646. Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. Su DS, Wen GD, Wu SC, Peng F and Schlögl R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 936–964. Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. Diao SL, Zhang XL, Shao ZB, Ding K, Jie JS and Zhang XH. Nano Energy 2017; 31: 359–366. Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. Kim T, Jung G, Yoo S, Suh KS and Ruoff RS. ACS Nano 2013; 7: 6899–6905. Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. Chen H, Guo F, Liu YJ, Huang TQ, Zheng BN, Ananth N, Xu Z, Gao WW and Gao C. Adv. Mater. 2017; 29: 1605958–1605964 Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. Cinti S and Arduini F. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017; 89: 107–122. Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. Jahan M, Bao Q and Loh KP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 6707–6713. Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. Shu J, Qiu ZL, Wei QH, Zhuang JY and Tang DP. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 667–672 Google Scholar
30. Yu X, Kuai L and Geng BY. Nanoscale 2012; 4: 5738–5743. Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. Li YG, Zhou W, Wang HL, Xie LM, Liang YY, Wei F, Idrobo JC, J Pennycook S and Dai HJ. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012; 7: 394–400. Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. Gao F, Cai XL, Wang X, Gao C, Liu SL, Gao F and Wang QX. Sens. Actuators, B 2013; 186: 380–387. Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. Li YR, Gu Y, Zheng B, Luo L, Li C, Yan XY, Zhang TT, Lu NN and Zhang ZQ. Talanta 2017; 162: 80–89. Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. Li C, Zhang TT, Zhao JY, Liu H, Zheng B, Gu Y, Yan XY, Li YR, Lu NN, Zhang ZQ and Feng GD. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017; 9: 2984–2994. Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. Vasilescu A, Ye R, Boulahneche S, Lamraoui S, Jijie R, Medjram MS, Gáspár S, Singh SK, Kurungot S, Melinte S, Boukherroub R and Szunerits S. Electrochim. Acta 2018; 266: 364–372. Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. Chekin F, Bagga K, Subramanian P, Jijie R, Singh SK, Kurungot S, Boukherroub R and Szunerits S. Sens. Actuators, B 2018; 262: 991–1000. Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. Li YY, Huang Y, Ou CZ, Zhu JL, Yuan XX, Yan L, Li WW and Zhang HY. Electrochim. Acta 2018; 259: 474–484. Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. Chen YL, Mei T, Chen Y, Wang JY, Li JH, Fu Y, Dai GC, Wang S, Xiong WL and Wang XB. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2016; 20: 2055–2062. Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. Sakthinathan S, Kubendhiran S, Chen SM, Karuppiah C and Chiu TW. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017; 121: 14096–14107. Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. Kubendhiran S, Sakthinathan S, Chen SM, Tamizhdurai P, Shanthi K and Karuppiah C. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017; 497: 207–216. Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. Sakthinathan S, Kubendhiran S, Chen SM and Tamizhdurai P. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 56375–56383. Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. Yan XY, Gu Y, Li C, Tang L, Zheng B, Li YR, Zhang ZQ and Yang M. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016; 77: 1032–1038. Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. Yan XY, Lu NN, Gu Y, Li C, Zhang TT, Liu H, Zhang ZQ and Zhai SY. Talanta 2018; 179: 401–408. Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. Wang A, Yu W, Huang Z, Zhou F, Song J, Song Y, Long L, Cifuentes MP, Humphrey MG, Zhang L, Shao J and Zhang C. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 23325–23336 Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. Wang YQ, Sauriat-Dorizon H and Korri-Youssoufi H. Sens. Actuators, B 2017; 251: 40–48. Web of Science, Google Scholar
46. Ye F, Nan JM, Wang LS, Song Y and Kim KB. Electrochim. Acta 2008; 53: 4156–4160. Web of Science, Google Scholar
47. Karuppiah C, Sakthinathan S, Chen SM, Manibalan K, Chen SM and Huang ST. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2016; 30: 40–46. Web of Science, Google Scholar
48. Wang HH, Jiang YY, Mahmood MHR, Liu HY, Sung HHY, Williams ID and Chang CK. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2015; 26: 529–533. Web of Science, Google Scholar
49. Wang HH, Yuan HQ, Mahmood MHR, Jiang YY, Cheng F, Shi L and Liu HY. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 97391–97399. Web of Science, Google Scholar
50. Wen WH, Xie AN, Wang HH, Zhang DX, Ali A, Ying X and Liu HY. Tetrahedron 2017; 73: 7169–7176. Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. Wang HH, Wen WH, Zou HB, Cheng F, Ali A, Shi L, Liu HY and Chang CK. New J. Chem. 2017; 41: 3508–3514. Web of Science, Google Scholar
52. Bartlett PN, Ghoneim E, El-Hefnawy G and El-Hallag I. Talanta 2005; 66: 869–874. Web of Science, Google Scholar