Nineteenth Special Issue for the ISPIM; Guest Editors: Joe Tidd, Eelko Huizingh and Steffen ConnNo Access

DETERMINANTS OF PROPENSITY VS. INTENSITY OF INNOVATION CO-OPERATION FOR SMEs

AMELIE CLOUTIER

Université Laval, Quebec, Canada

E-mail Address: amelie.cloutier.3@ulaval.ca

Search for more papers by this author

and

NABIL AMARA

Université Laval, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618400042Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), innovation co-operation represents a promising avenue to get around limitations and increase their innovation capacity. But under which conditions are firms more susceptible to engage in such ventures? The purpose of this research paper is to further our understanding of the factors contributing to innovation co-operation for manufacturing SMEs from the firm’s perspective. Following an online and telephone survey with SME managers ( $n = 273$ ), we studied the presence or absence of innovation co-operation. We subsequently investigated the intensity of innovation co-operation with market partners (clients, competitors, consultants, and suppliers) and research partners (laboratories, post-secondary education institutions, technology transfer centers, and universities), addressing gaps in a literature dominated by binary analysis. Our empirical analyses suggest that innovation co-operation is promoted by several key determinants. However, it highlights there are many important differences in the determinants of propensity vs. intensity of innovation co-operation.

Keywords:

References

Acs, ZJ, DB Audretsch and MP Feldman [1994] R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336–340. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ahire, SL and S Devaraj [2001] An empirical comparison of statistical construct validation approaches. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 319–329. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ahuja, G [2000] Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Arvanitis, S and T Bolli [2012] A comparison of national and international innovation cooperation in five European countries. Review of Industrial Organization, 1–29. Web of Science, Google Scholar
Barge-Gil, A [2010] Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior. Technovation, 30, 195–206. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Barnir, A and KA Smith [2002] Interfirm alliances in the small business: The role of social networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 219–232. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Bayona, C, T García-Marco and E Huerta [2001] Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30, 1289–1307. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Belderbos, R, M Carree, B Diederen, B Lokshin and R Veugelers [2004] Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1237–1263. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Berger, AN and GF Udell [1998] The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 613–673. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Birru, WT [2011] Horizontal inter-firm cooperation in Ethiopian small and medium enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18, 806–820. Crossref, Google Scholar
Blind, K and A Mangelsdorf [2013] Alliance formation of SMEs: Empirical evidence from standardization committees. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60, 148–156. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Cho, D-H and PI Yu [2000] Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in the Korean telecommunication industry. Technovation, 20, 691–704. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Chun, H and S-B Mun [2012] Determinants of R&D cooperation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Small Business Economics, 39, 419–436. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Chung, J-W, ZT Bae and JS Kim [2003] Changing patterns of technological cooperation activities of innovative small firms along technological development stages in the Korean telecommunication sector. Technovation, 23, 163–173. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Classen, N, A Van Gils, Y Bammens and M Carree [2012] Accessing resources from innovation partners: The search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 191–215. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Cloutier, A and N Amara [2017] Determinants of innovation co-operation for manufacturing SMEs: Evidence from a systematic review of the literature (1992–2015). In ASAC 2017 Conf., May 30th 2017, Montréal (Québec, Canada). Google Scholar
Cohen, J [1988] Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioral Sciences. NJ, United States: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
De Faria, P, F Lima and R Santos [2010] Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners. Research Policy, 39, 1082–1092. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
De Leeuw, ED [2005] To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 233–255. Google Scholar
Dickson, PH and KM Weaver [2011] Institutional readiness and small to medium-sized enterprise alliance formation. Journal of Small Business Management, 49, 126–148. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Edwards-Schachter, M, E Castro-Martínez and I Fernández-De-Lucio [2011] International co-operation between firms on innovation and R&D: Empirical evidence from Argentina and Spain. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6, 126–147. Crossref, Google Scholar
Field, A [2013] Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. Google Scholar
Fontana, R, A Geuna and M Matt [2006] Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35, 309–323. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Freel, MS [2003] Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy, 32, 751–770. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Fritsch, M [2001] Co-operation in regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 35, 297–307. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Goduscheit, RC and MP Knudsen [2015] How barriers to collaboration prevent progress in demand for knowledge: A dyadic study of small and medium-sized firms, research and technology organizations and universities. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24, 29–54. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Gouvernement Du Canada. (2017). Le budget 2017, bâtir une classe moyenne forte [Online]. Ottawa. Available: http://www.budget.gc.ca/2017/home-accueil-fr.html [accessed 26 March2017]. Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, J, N Roijakkers and, HV Kranenburg [2008] The formation of subsequent inter-firm R&D partnerships between large pharmaceutical companies and small, entrepreneurial biotechnology firms - how important is inter-organisational trust? International Journal of Technology Management, 44, 81. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Lagacé, D and M Bourgault [2003] Linking manufacturing improvement programs to the competitive priorities of Canadian SMEs. Technovation, 23, 705–715. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Lenz-Cesar, F and A Heshmati [2012] An econometric approach to identify determinants of cooperation for innovation among firms. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 227–235. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Lin, J, SC Fang and LYC Hsiao [2003] The business strategies of technological collaboration: Taiwan electronic industry perspective. International Journal of Technology Transfer & Commercialisation, 2, 111–127. Crossref, Google Scholar
Lohrke, FT, PM Kreiser and, KM Weaver [2006] The influence of current firm performance on future SME alliance formation intentions: A six-country study. Journal of Business Research, 59, 19–27. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Low, DR, RL Chapman and TR Sloan [2007] Inter-relationships between innovation and market orientation in SMEs. Management Research News, 30, 878–891. Crossref, Google Scholar
Menard, SW [2002] Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Crossref, Google Scholar
Muscio, A [2007] The impact of absorptive capacity on SMEs’ collaboration. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, 653–668. Crossref, Google Scholar
Nunnally, JC and IH Bernstein [1978] Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
OCDE (2005). Manuel d’Oslo: Principes Directeurs Pour le recueil et l’interprétation des données sur l’innovation, Éditions Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (OCDÉ). Google Scholar
OECD [2005] Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Crossref, Google Scholar
OECD (2018). Gross Domestic Spending on R&D [Online]. Available: https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm [accessed February 2017, 2018]. Google Scholar
Okamuro, H, M Kato and Y Honjo [2011] Determinants of R&D cooperation in Japanese start-ups. Research Policy, 40, 728–738. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Pavitt, K [1984] Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Pires, CP, S Sarkar and L Carvalho [2008] Innovation in services–how different from manufacturing? The Service Industries Journal, 28, 1339–1356. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Powell, WW and S Grodal [2005] Networks of innovators. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, DC Mowery and RR Nelson (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Rasmussen, KB and H Thimm [2009] Fact-based understanding of business survey non. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7, 83–92. Google Scholar
Teirlinck, P and A Spithoven [2013] Research collaboration and R&D outsourcing: Different R&D personnel requirements in SMEs. Technovation, 33, 142–153. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Terziovski, M [2010] Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 892–902. Web of Science, Google Scholar
Tether, BS [2005] Do services innovate (differently)? insights from the european innobarometer survey. Industry and Innovation, 12, 153–184. Crossref, Google Scholar
Theyel, N [2013] Extending open innovation throughout the value chain by small and medium-sized manufacturers. International Small Business Journal, 31, 256. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Tomlinson, PR [2010] Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Research Policy, 39, 762–775. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Tomlinson, PR and FM Fai [2013] The nature of SME co-operation and innovation: A multi-scalar and multi-dimensional analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 141, 316–326. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Van Auken, H, A Madrid-Guijarro and D Garcia-Perez-De-Lema [2008] Innovation and performance in Spanish manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8, 36–56. Crossref, Google Scholar
Van Gils, A and PS Zwart [2009] Alliance formation motives in SMEs an explorative conjoint analysis study. International Small Business Journal, 27, 5–37. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Verbano, C, M Crema and K Venturini [2015] The identification and characterization of open innovation profiles in Italian small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 1052–1075. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Xia, TJ [2013] Absorptive capacity and openness of small biopharmaceutical firms – a European Union-United States comparison. R&D Management, 43, 333–351. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar