No Access

Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 8 90128, Palermo, Italy

E-mail Address: marco.locascio01@unipa.it

and

Ivano Benedetti

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3755-2768

Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 8 90128, Palermo, Italy

E-mail Address: ivano.benedetti@unipa.it

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1756973721440017Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

This article is part of the issue:

Special Issue on Fracture and Damage Mechanics — Part I
Guest Editors: Luis Rodríguez-Tembleque, José A. Sanz-Herrera and M. H. Aliabadi

Abstract

Numerical tools which are able to predict and explain the initiation and propagation of damage at the microscopic level in heterogeneous materials are of high interest for the analysis and design of modern materials. In this contribution, we report the application of a recently developed numerical scheme based on the coupling between the Virtual Element Method (VEM) and the Boundary Element Method (BEM) within the framework of continuum damage mechanics (CDM) to analyze the progressive loss of material integrity in heterogeneous materials with complex microstructures. VEM is a novel numerical technique that, allowing the use of general polygonal mesh elements, assures conspicuous simplification in the data preparation stage of the analysis, notably for computational micro-mechanics problems, whose analysis domain often features elaborate geometries. BEM is a widely adopted and efficient numerical technique that, due to its underlying formulation, allows reducing the problem dimensionality, resulting in substantial simplification of the pre-processing stage and in the decrease of the computational effort without affecting the solution accuracy. The implemented technique has been applied to an artificial microstructure, consisting of the transverse section of a circular shaped stiff inclusion embedded in a softer matrix. BEM is used to model the inclusion that is supposed to behave within the linear elastic range, while VEM is used to model the surrounding matrix material, developing more complex nonlinear behaviors. Numerical results are reported and discussed to validate the proposed method.

Keywords:

References

1. M. Lo Cascio, M. Grifo, A. Milazzo and I. Benedetti, Computational homogenization of heterogeneous materials by a novel hybrid numerical scheme, J. Multiscale Model. 11(4) (2020) 66–88. Link, Google Scholar
2. M. Lo Cascio, I. Benedetti and V. Mantič, Micro damage and cracking in fibre reinforced composites by a novel hybrid numerical technique, AIP Conf. Proc. 2309 (2020) 020001. Crossref, Google Scholar
3. M. Lo Cascio, A. Milazzo and I. Benedetti, A hybrid virtual boundary element formulation for heterogeneous materials, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 199 (2021) 106404. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. L. Beirão da Veiga, F. Brezzi, A. Cangiani, G. Manzini, L. D. Marini and A. Russo, Basic principles of virtual element methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23(1) (2013) 199–214. Link, Google Scholar
5. E. Artioli, S. Marfia and E. Sacco, High-order virtual element method for the homogenization of long fiber nonlinear composites, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 341 (2018) 571–585. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. M. Lo Cascio, A. Milazzo and I. Benedetti, Virtual element method for computational homogenization of composite and heterogeneous materials, Compos. Struct. 232 (2020) 111523. Crossref, Google Scholar
7. M. Lo Cascio, A. Milazzo and I. Benedetti, Virtual Element Method: Micro-Mechanics Applications, Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 827 (Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2020), pp. 128–133. Google Scholar
8. P. K. Banerjee and R. Butterfield, Boundary Element Methods in Engineering Science (McGraw-Hill, London, 1981). Google Scholar
9. M. H. Aliabadi, The Boundary Element Method, Vol. 2: Applications in Solids and Structures (John Wiley & Sons, 2002). Google Scholar
10. I. Benedetti and M. Aliabadi, A three-dimensional cohesive-frictional grain-boundary micromechanical model for intergranular degradation and failure in polycrystalline materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 265 (2013) 36–62. Crossref, Google Scholar
11. V. Gulizzi, A. Milazzo and I. Benedetti, An enhanced grain-boundary framework for computational homogenization and micro-cracking simulations of polycrystalline materials, Comput. Mech. 56 (2015) 631–651. Crossref, Google Scholar
12. I. Benedetti and M. Aliabadi, Multiscale modeling of polycrystalline materials: A boundary element approach to material degradation and fracture, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 289 (2015) 429–453. Crossref, Google Scholar
13. V. Gulizzi and I. Benedetti, Micro-cracking of brittle polycrystalline materials with initial damage, Eur. J. Comput. Mech. 25(1–2) (2016) 38–53. Crossref, Google Scholar
14. I. Benedetti, V. Gulizzi and V. Mallardo, A grain boundary formulation for crystal plasticity, Int. J. Plast. 83 (2016) 202–224. Crossref, Google Scholar
15. I. Benedetti and V. Gulizzi, A grain-scale model for high-cycle fatigue degradation in polycrystalline materials, Int. J. Fatigue 116 (2018) 90–105. Crossref, Google Scholar
16. I. Benedetti, V. Gulizzi and A. Milazzo, A microstructural model for homogenisation and cracking of piezoelectric polycrystals, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 357 (2019) 112595. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. F. Parrinello, V. Gulizzi and I. Benedetti, A computational framework for low-cycle fatigue in polycrystalline materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 383 (2021) 113898. Crossref, Google Scholar
18. E. Artioli, L. Beirão da Veiga, C. Lovadina and E. Sacco, Arbitrary order 2D virtual elements for polygonal meshes: Part I, elastic problem, Comput. Mech. 60 (2017) 355–377. Crossref, Google Scholar
19. L. Beirão da Veiga, C. Lovadina and D. Mora, A virtual element method for elastic and inelastic problems on polytope meshes, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 295 (2015) 327–346. Crossref, Google Scholar
20. E. Artioli, L. Beirão Da Veiga, C. Lovadina and E. Sacco, Arbitrary order 2d virtual elements for polygonal meshes: Part ii, inelastic problem, Comput. Mech. 60 (2017) 643–657. Crossref, Google Scholar
21. J. Lemaitre, Local approach of fracture, Eng. Fract. Mech. 25 (1986) 523–537. Crossref, Google Scholar
22. J. C. Simo and J. Ju, Strain-and stress-based continuum damage models—i. formulation, Int. J. Solids Struct. 23 (1987) 821–840. Crossref, Google Scholar
23. J. Simo and J. Ju, Strain-and stress-based continuum damage models—ii. computational aspects, Int. J. Solids Struct. 23 (1987) 841–869. Crossref, Google Scholar
24. J. L. Chaboche, Continuum damage mechanics: Part I – general concepts, J. Appl. Mech. 55 (1988) 59–64. Crossref, Google Scholar
25. A. Melro, P. Camanho, F. A. Pires and S. Pinho, Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: Part constitutive modelling, Int. J. Solids Struct. 50 (2013) 1897–1905. Crossref, Google Scholar
26. M. Jirásek, Nonlocal damage mechanics, Revue europenne de gnie civil 11 (2007) 993–1021. Crossref, Google Scholar
27. F. París, E. Correa and V. Mantič, Kinking of transversal interface cracks between fiber and matrix, J. Appl. Mech. 74 (2007) 703–716. Crossref, Google Scholar
28. V. Mantič, Interface crack onset at a circular cylindrical inclusion under a remote transverse tension. application of a coupled stress and energy criterion, Int. J. Solids Struct. 46 (2009) 1287–1304. Crossref, Google Scholar
29. L. Távara, V. Mantič, E. Graciani and F. París, Bem analysis of crack onset and propagation along fiber matrix interface under transverse tension using a linear elastic brittle interface model, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 35 (2011) 207–222. Crossref, Google Scholar
30. I. García, M. Paggi and V. Mantič, Fiber-size effects on the onset of fiber–matrix debonding under transverse tension: A comparison between cohesive zone and finite fracture mechanics models, Eng. Fract. Mech. 115 (2014) 96–110. Crossref, Google Scholar
31. G. Pijaudier-Cabot and Z. P. Bažant, Nonlocal damage theory, J. Eng. Mech. 113 (1987) 1512–1533. Crossref, Google Scholar
32. M. Jirásek, Nonlocal models for damag and fracture: Comparison of approaches, Int. J. Solids Struct. 35(31–32) (1998) 4133–4145. Crossref, Google Scholar
33. I. Benedetti, H. Nguyen, R. A. Soler-Crespo, W. Gao, L. Mao, A. Ghasemi, J. Wen, S. B. Nguyen and H. D. Espinosa, Formulation and validation of a reduced order model of 2D materials exhibiting a two-phase microstructure as applied to graphene oxide, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 112 (2018) 66–88. Crossref, Google Scholar