Special Issue: Selected Papers from 3rd IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR 2020); Guest Editors: M.-C. Hu and W. HürstNo Access

Inspiring Movement — Physical Activity in a Virtual Sea as a Driver for Ecological Awareness

Carolin Strassmann

Institute of Computer Science & Institute of Positive Computing, University of Applied Sciences Ruhr West, Lützowstraße 5, Bottrop 46236, Germany

E-mail Address: carolin.strassmann@hs-ruhrwest.de

Search for more papers by this author

Alexander Arntz

Institute of Computer Science & Institute of Positive Computing, University of Applied Sciences Ruhr West, Lützowstraße 5, Bottrop 46236, Germany

E-mail Address: alexander.arntz@hs-ruhrwest.de

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Sabrina C. Eimler

Institute of Computer Science & Institute of Positive Computing, University of Applied Sciences Ruhr West, Lützowstraße 5, Bottrop 46236, Germany

E-mail Address: sabrina.eimler@hs-ruhrwest.de

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793351X21400158Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

As environmental pollution continues to expand, new ways for raising awareness for the consequences need to be explored. Virtual reality has emerged as an effective tool for behavioral change. This paper investigates if virtual reality applications controlled through physical activity can support an even stronger effect, because they enhance attention and recall performance by stimulating working memory through motor functions. This was tested in an experimental study ( $N = 47$ $N = 47$ ) using a virtual reality head-mounted display in combination with the ICAROS fitness device enabling participants to explore either a plastic-polluted or a non-polluted sea. Results indicated that using a regular controller elicits more presence and a more intense Flow experience than the ICAROS condition, which people controlled via their physical activity. Moreover, the plastic-polluted stimulus was more effective in inducing people’s stated tendency to change their attitude than a non-polluted sea.

Keywords:

References

1. H. Ritchie and M. Roser, Plastic pollution, 2018, https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution. Google Scholar
2. C. for Biology Diversity, Ocean plastics pollution, 2020, https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/ocean_plastics/. Google Scholar
3. H. Ritchie and M. Roser, Ecological impacts of marine plastic debris, 2018, https://ourworldindata.org/ecological-impacts-of-marine-plastic-debris. Google Scholar
4. S. J. Ahn, J. N. Bailenson and D. Park , Short- and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior, Comput. Human Behav. 39 (2014) 235–245. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. D. Perez-López and M. Contero , Delivering educational multimedia contents through an augmented reality application: A case study on its impact on knowledge acquisition and retention, Turk. Online J. Educat. Technol. 127 (2013) 20–28. Google Scholar
6. J. Jerald , The VR Book — Human-Centered Design for Virtual Reality (Morgan and Claypool Publishers, New York, 2016). Google Scholar
7. G. Burdea and P. Coiffet , Virtual Reality Technology, 2nd edn. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
8. S. Zach and E. Shalom , The influence of acute physical activity on working memory, Percept. Motor Skills 122 (2016) 365–374. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. M. Dębska, J. Polechoński, A. Mynarski and P. Polechoński , Enjoyment and intensity of physical activity in immersive virtual reality performed on innovative training devices in compliance with recommendations for health, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(19) (2019) 3673–3685. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. B. Feodoroff, I. Konstantinidis and I. Froböse , Effects of full body exergaming in virtual reality on cardiovascular and muscular parameters: Cross-sectional experiment, JMIR Serious Games 7(3) (2019) e12324. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. H.-C. Huang, T. T. L. Pham, M.-K. Wong, H.-Y. Chiu, Y.-H. Yang and C.-I. Teng , How to create flow experience in exergames? perspective of flow theory, Telem. Inform. 35(5) (2018) 1288–1296. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. A. Perttula, K. Kiili, A. Lindstedt and P. Tuomi , Flow experience in game based learning–A systematic literature review, Int. J. Serious Games 4(1) (2017) 57–72. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper , User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction (CRC Press, 1986). Crossref, Google Scholar
14. ICAROSGmbH, Icaros vr, 2018, https://www.icaros.com/. Google Scholar
15. R. S. Kennedy, N. E. Lane, K. S. Berbaum and M. G. Lilienthal , Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness, Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3 (1993) 203–220. Crossref, Google Scholar
16. B. G. Witmer and M. J. Singer , Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire, Presence 7 (1998) 225–240. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. F. Rheinberg, R. Vollmeyer and S. Engeser, Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2003, ch. Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (Tests und Trends), pp. 261–279. Google Scholar
18. H. W. Krohne, B. Egloff, C.-W. Kohlmann and A. Tausch , Positive and Negative Affect Schedule–German Version (American Psychological Association (APA), 1996). Google Scholar
19. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis and F. D. Davis , User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quart. 27(3) (2003) 425–478. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. L. J. Francis and J. E. Greer , Measuring attitude towards science among secondary school students: the affective domain, Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 17(2) (1999) 219–226. Crossref, Google Scholar
21. J. Schahn, Seu/3 — skalensystem zur erfassung des umweltbewusstseins — dritte, überarbeitete version 1999, 2000. Google Scholar
22. F. J. Neyer, J. Felber and C. Gebhardt, Kurzskala technikbereitschaft (tb, technology commitment), Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen, 2016. Google Scholar
23. C. Straßmann, S. C. Eimler, A. Arntz, D. Keßler, S. Zielinski, G. Brandenberg, V. Dümpel and U. Handmann , Relax yourself — using virtual reality to enhance employees’ mental health and work performance, in Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, eds. S. Brewster, G. Fitzpatrick, A. Cox and V. Kostakos (ACM Press, New York, 2019), pp. 1–6. Crossref, Google Scholar
24. K. M. Stanney, R. S. Kennedy and J. Drexler , Cybersickness is not simulator sickness, in Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1999, pp. 1138–1142. Google Scholar
25. A. deNoyelles, S. R. Hornik and R. D. Johnson , Exploring the dimensions of self-efficacy in virtual world learning: Environment, task, and content, MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 10 (2014) 255–271. Google Scholar
26. K. Hänsel, N. Wilde, H. Haddadi and A. Alomainy, Wearable computing for health and fitness: Exploring the relationship between data and human behaviour, 2015, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.05238v2. Google Scholar
27. I. Lewis, B. Watson, R. Tay and K. M. White , The role of fear appeals in improving driver safety: A review of the effectiveness of fear-arousing (threat) appeals in road safety advertising, Int. J. Behav. Consult. Ther. 3(2) (2007) 203–222. Crossref, Google Scholar
28. N. Loewe and M. Nadj , Physio-adaptive systems-a state-of-the-art review and future research directions, 28th European Conf. Information System, 2020. Google Scholar
29. J. W. Brehm , A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, 1966). Google Scholar