Special Issue on Multimedia Computing; Guest Editors: Mouzhi Ge, Fabio Persia and Giovanni PilatoNo Access

Optimizing Mobile Reading Experience: Adaptive Font Size Adjustment in a Context-Aware Application

Andreas Mallas

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9265-5105

Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, Rio Campus, Rio, GR26500, Greece

E-mail Address: mallas@ceid.upatras.gr

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Hara Papadatou

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9369-180X

Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, Rio Campus, Rio, GR26500, Greece

E-mail Address: papadatou.h@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Michalis Xenos

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8440-4840

Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, Rio Campus, Rio, GR26500, Greece

E-mail Address: xenos@ceid.upatras.gr

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793351X2445003XCited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The reading experience on a mobile device can be influenced by many external elements that affect the viewing conditions. The user holding position, operating style, and the light conditions of the surroundings can all play a crucial factor in the legibility of the text. Furthermore, the user’s eye conditions may be an extra factor to consider when determining how to improve the reading experience. This study presents a context-aware application that adjusts the text font size based on the distance between the user and the device. The users select their preferred font size at certain distances in the calibration phase, accounting for individual preferences or their eye conditions, and the application uses the device’s front camera to calculate the distance in real time and adjust the font size accordingly. We present implementation details and challenges faced during development and how they were addressed. A two-part experiment ( $n$ $n$ = 34) revealed that the application scored an excellent usability score while no differences were found between users with and without eye conditions, showing that both user groups find it equally usable. Additionally, initial results suggest that the visual landmarks used showed a promising start at addressing issues related to our approach.

Keywords:

References

1. D. Raptis, N. Tselios, J. Kjeldskov and M. B. Skov , Does size matter? Investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users’ perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency, in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, in MobileHCI ‘13 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA), August 2013, pp. 127–136, https://doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493204. Google Scholar
2. T.-Y. Ma, C.-Y. Lin, S.-W. Hsu, C.-W. Hu and T.-W. Hou , Automatic brightness control of the handheld device display with low illumination, in 2012 IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE), May 2012, Zhangjiajie, China, pp. 382–385, https://doi.org/10.1109/CSAE.2012.6272797. Google Scholar
3. S. Dritsa, A. Mallas and M. Xenos , Screen reading regions in social media comments: An eye-tracking analysis of visual attention on smartphones, in Proc. 27th Pan-Hellenic Conf. Progress in Computing and Informatics, in PCI ‘23 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA), February 2024, pp. 95–101, https://doi.org/10.1145/3635059.3635074. Google Scholar
4. M. Bernard, C. H. Liao and M. Mills , The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults, in CHI ‘01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, in CHI EA ‘01 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA), March 2001, pp. 175–176, https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634173. Google Scholar
5. S. K. Bhatia, A. Samal, N. Rajan and M. T. Kiviniemi , Effect of font size, italics, and colour count on web usability, Int. J. Comput. Vis. Robot. 2(2) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCVR.2011.042271. Google Scholar
6. I. Darroch, J. Goodman, S. Brewster and P. Gray , The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers, in Human–Computer Interaction—INTERACT 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, eds. M. F. Costabile and F. Paternò (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005), pp. 253–266, https://doi.org/10.1007/11555261_23. Crossref, Google Scholar
7. T.-H. Tsai, K. C. Tseng and Y.-S. Chang , Testing the usability of smartphone surface gestures on different sizes of smartphones by different age groups of users, Comput. Hum. Behav. 75 (2017) 103–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.013. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. A. Mallas, H. Papadatou and M. Xenos , Maintaining text legibility regarding font size based on user distance in mobile devices: Application development and user evaluation, in 25th IEEE Int. Symp. Multimedia, Laguna Hills, California (2023) (to be published). Crossref, Google Scholar
9. M. L. Bernard, B. S. Chaparro, M. M. Mills and C. G. Halcomb , Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readibility of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 59(6) (2003) 823–835, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00121-6. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. G. Franken, A. Podlesek and K. Možina , Eye-tracking study of reading speed from LCD displays: Influence of type style and type size, J. Eye Mov. Res. 8(1) (2015) 1, https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.1.3. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. L. Rello, M. Pielot and M.-C. Marcos , Make it big! The effect of font size and line spacing on online readability, in Proc. 2016 CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, in CHI ‘16 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA), May 2016, pp. 3637–3648, https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858204. Google Scholar
12. H.-W. Liang and Y.-H. Hwang , Mobile phone use behaviors and postures on public transportation systems, PLoS One 11(2) (2016) e0148419, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148419. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. Y. Bababekova, M. Rosenfield, J. E. Hue and R. R. Huang , Font size and viewing distance of handheld smart phones, Optom.t Vis. Sci 88(7) (2011) 795, https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182198792. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. C. Coles-Brennan, A. Sulley and G. Young , Management of digital eye strain, Clin. Exp. Optom. 102(1) (2019) 18–29, https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12798. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. L. Hall and C. Brennan-Coles , More screen time = more digital eye strain, Contact Lens Spectr. 30 (2015) 38–40. Google Scholar
16. B. Schilit, N. Adams and R. Want , Context-aware computing applications, in 1994 1st Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (IEEE, 1994), pp. 85–90. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. J. Yu, Y. Chen and J. Li , Color scheme adaptation to enhance user experience on smartphone displays leveraging ambient light, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 16(3) (2017) 688–701, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2016.2575824. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. H. J. C. Letourneur, D. J. Foster and L. E. Sellier, Dynamic display adjustment, US9483981B2, 1 November 2016. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9483981B2/en (accessed on 30 December 2022). Google Scholar
19. K. Kim, A. Erickson, A. Lambert, G. Bruder and G. Welch , Effects of dark mode on visual fatigue and acuity in optical see-through head-mounted displays, in Symp. Spatial User Interaction, in SUI ‘19. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA), October 2019, pp. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1145/3357251.3357584. Google Scholar
20. C. Eastwood-Sutherland and T. J. Gale , Eye-screen distance monitoring for computer use, in 2011 Annual Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, August 2011, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 2164–2167, https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090406. Google Scholar
21. W. Ponglangka, N. Theera-Umpon and S. Auephanwiriyakul , Eye-gaze distance estimation based on gray-level intensity of image patch, in 2011 Int. Symp. Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications Systems (ISPACS), December 2011, Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPACS.2011.6146205. Google Scholar
22. K. A. Rahman, Md. S. Hossain, Md. A.-A. Bhuiyan, T. Zhang, Md. Hasanuzzaman and H. Ueno , Person to camera distance measurement based on eye-distance, in 2009 3rd Int. Conf. Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, June 2009, Qingdao, China, pp. 137–141, https://doi.org/10.1109/MUE.2009.34. Google Scholar
23. I. König, P. Beau and K. David , A new context: Screen to face distance, in 2014 8th Int. Symp. Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT), April 2014, Firenze, Italy, pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMICT.2014.6825217. Google Scholar
24. K. S. Hong, J. Park, K. H. Kim and J. G. Shon , Implementation of automatic adjustment of font size system on smartphone, in Advances in Computer Science and Ubiquitous Computing, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, eds. J. J. Park, D.-S. Park, Y.-S. Jeong and Y. Pan , (Springer, Singapore, 2020), pp. 159–164, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9341-9_27. Crossref, Google Scholar
25. A. Mallas, M. Xenos and C. Katsanos , A descriptive model of passive and natural passive human–computer interaction, in Human–Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design Methods, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. M. Kurosu (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 104–116, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_7. Crossref, Google Scholar
26. B. Serim and G. Jacucci , Explicating ‘Implicit Interaction’: An examination of the concept and challenges for research, in Proc. 2019 CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2019), pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300647. Google Scholar
27. C. Klein and B. B. Bederson , Benefits of animated scrolling, in CHI ‘05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, in CHI EA ‘05 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2005), pp. 1965–1968, https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057068. Crossref, Google Scholar
28. J. Brooke , SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale, in Usability Evaluation in Industry (CRC Press, 1996), pp. 189–194. Google Scholar
29. C. Katsanos, N. Tselios and M. Xenos , Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems: A first step towards standardization of the system usability scale in Greek, in 2012 16th Panhellenic Conf. Informatics, October 2012, Piraeus, Greece, pp. 302–307, https://doi.org/10.1109/PCi.2012.38. Google Scholar
30. A. Bangor, P. Kortum and J. Miller , Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale, J. Usability Stud. 4(3) (2009) 114–123. Google Scholar