Research ArticleNo Access

Hopf bifurcation of a delayed predator–prey model with Allee effect and anti-predator behavior

Xinyue Xu

School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China

E-mail Address: xxy_0418@126.com

Search for more papers by this author

Yan Meng

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0301-3993

School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China

E-mail Address: mengyan_ustb@sina.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Yangyang Shao

School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China

E-mail Address: syy_1228@126.com

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S179352452250125XCited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

This paper proposes a diffusive predator–prey model with Allee effect, time delay and anti-predator behavior. First, the existence and stability of all equilibria are analyzed and the conditions for the appearance of the Hopf bifurcation are studied. Using the normal form and center manifold theory, the formulas which can determine the direction, period and stability of Hopf bifurcation are obtained. Numerical simulations show that the Allee effect can determine the survival abundance of the prey and predator populations, and anti-predator behavior can greatly improve the stability of the coexisting equilibrium.

Keywords:

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles in IJB!

Check out new Biomathematics books in our Mathematics 2018 catalogue!
Featuring author Frederic Y M Wan and more!

References

1. V. Volterra, Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically, Nature 118 (1926) 558, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(53)80099-6. Crossref, Google Scholar
2. W. Yang, Permanence of a diffusive Leslie–Gower predator–prey model incorporating a prey refuge, Int. J. Biomath. 7 (2014) 8, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524514500272. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. Y. Li, H. Liu and R. Yang, A delayed diffusive predator–prey system with predator cannibalism, Comput. Math. Appl. 75 (2018) 1355–1367, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.camwa.2017.11.006. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. K. Hattaf, On the stability and numerical scheme of fractional differential equations with application to biology, Computation 10 (2022) 97, https://doi.org/10.3390/ computation10060097. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. H. Qi and X. Meng, Threshold behavior of a stochastic predator–prey system with prey refuge and fear effect, Appl. Math. Lett. 113 (2021) 106846, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106846. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. F. Yousef, A. Yousef and C. Maj, Effects of fear in a fractional-order predator–prey system with predator density-dependent prey mortality, Chaos Solitons Fractals 145 (2021) 110711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110711. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. K. Hattaf, A new generalized definition of fractional derivative with non-singular kernel, Computation 8 (2020) 49, https://doi.org/10.3390/computation8020049. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. D. Mukherjee, Role of fear in predator–prey system with intraspecific competition, Math. Comput. Simul. 177 (2020) 263–275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.04.025. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. Y. Dong and S. Li, Long-time behavior of a class of diffusive predator–prey systems with fear cost and protection zone, Appl. Math. Lett. 121 (2021) 107388, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107388. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. C. Holling, The functional response of predator to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation, Mem. Ent. Sec. Can. 45 (1965) 1–60, https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9745fv. Crossref, Google Scholar
11. B. Dubey, A. Kumar and A. P. Maiti, Global stability and hopf-bifurcation of prey–predator system with two discrete delays including habitat complexity and prey refuge, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 67 (2019) 528–554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.07.019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. A. P. Maiti, B. Dubey and A. Chakraborty, Global analysis of a delayed stage structure prey-predator model with crowley-martin type functional response, Math. Comput. Simul. 162 (2019) 58–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.01.009. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. L. Zhu and S. Wu, Traveling wave solutions for a diffusive predator-prey model with predator saturation and competition, Int. J. Biomath. 10 (2017) 23, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524517500863. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. R. Yang, M. Liu and C. Zhang, A diffusive predator–prey system with additional food and intra-specific competition among predators, Int. J. Biomath. 11 (2018) 28, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524518500602. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. X. Tao and L. Zhu, Study of periodic diffusion and time delay induced spatiotemporal patterns in a predator–prey system, Chaos Solitons Fractals 150 (2021) 111101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111101. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. R. Han, L. Guin and B. Dai, Consequences of refuge and diffusion in a spatiotemporal predator–prey model, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 60 (2021) 36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2021.103311. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. F. Dai and B. Liu, Global solution for a general cross-diffusion two-competitive-predator and one-prey system with predator-taxis, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 89 (2020) 105336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105336. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. B. Chakraborty, S. Ghorai and N. Bairagi, Reaction-diffusion predator–prey-parasite system and spatiotemporal complexity, Appl. Math. Comput. 386 (2020) 125518, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125518. Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. R. Dáger, V. Navarro, M. Negreanub and A. Vargas, Uniform asymptotic behavior of numerical solutions for a predator–prey system with diffusion and chemotaxis, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 120 (2020) 82–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.08.010. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. M. Perc and P. Grigolini, Collective behavior and evolutionary games-an introduction, Chaos Solitons Fractals 56 (2013) 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2013.06.002. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. A. Szolnoki, M. Mobilia, L. Jiang, B. Szczesny, A. Rucklidge and M. Perc, Cyclic dominance in evolutionary games: A review, J. R. Soc. Interf. 11 (2014) 20, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0735. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. A. Pallini, A. Jaassen and M. Sabelis, Predators induce interspecific herbivore competition for food in refuge space, Ecol. Lett. 1 (1998) 7–171, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.1998.00019.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. R. Tolrian, Predator-included morphological defenses: Costs, life history shifts, and maternal effects in daphnia pulex, Ecology 76 (1995) 750–1691, https://doi.org/10.2307/1940703. Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. A. Janssen, F. Faraji, T. van der Hammen, S. Magalhães and M. Sabelis, Interspecific infanticide deters predators, Ecol. Lett. 5 (2002) 490–494, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00349.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. Y. Saito, Prey kills predator: Counter-attack success of a spider miteagainst its specific phytoseiid predator, Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2 (1986) 47–62, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193354. Crossref, Google Scholar
26. A. Ives and A. Dobson, Antipredator behaviour and the population dynamics of simple predator–prey systems, Amer. Natur. 130 (1987) 431–447. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. R. Ramao-Jiliberto, E. Frodden and A. Aránguiz-Acuña, Pre-encounter versus post-encounter inducible defenses in predator-prey systems, Ecol. Model. 200 (2007) 99–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.023. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. P. Srinivasu and I. Gayatri, Influence of prey reverse capacity on predator–prey dynamics, Ecol. Model. 181 (2005) 191–202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.06.031. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. B. Tang and Y. Xiao, Bifurcation analysis of a predator–prey model with anti-predator behaviour, Chaos Solitons Fractals 70 (2015) 58–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2014.11.008. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. W. Allee, Animal Aggregations, A Study in General Sociology, Vol. 751 (The University of Chicago Press, 1931), pp. 1885–1955, https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7313. Crossref, Google Scholar
31. B. Dennis, Allee effects: Population growth, critical density, and the chance of extinction, Nat. Resour. Model 3 (1989) 481–538, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.1989.tb00119.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
32. M. McCarthy, The allee effect, finding mates and theoretical models, Ecol. Model. 103 (1997) 99–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00104-X. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. G. Wang, X. Liang and F. Wang, The competitive dynamics of populations subject to an allee effect, Ecol. Model. 124 (1999) 183–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00160-X. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. J. Liu and X. Zhang, Hopf bifurcation of a delayed diffusive predator–prey model with strong allee effect, Adv. Differ. Equ. 1 (2017) 200, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1254-7. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. W. Wang, Y. Zhu, Y. Cai and W. Wang, Dynamical complexity induced by allee effect in a predator–prey model, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 16 (2014) 103–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2013.09.010. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. J. Banerjeea, S. Sasmalb and R. Layek, Supercritical and subcritical hopf-bifurcations in a two-delayed prey–predator system with density-dependent mortality of predator and strong allee effect in prey, BioSystems 180 (2019) 19–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2014.11.008. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. P. Ye and D. Wu, Impacts of strong allee effect and hunting cooperation for a leslie-gower predator–prey system, Chin. J. Phys. 68 (2020) 49–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2020.07.021. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. Y. Song and J. Wei, Local hopf bifurcation and global periodic solutions in a delayed predator–prey system, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 301 (2005) 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.06.056. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. P. Pal, P. Mandal and K. Lahiri, A delayed ratio-dependent predator–prey model of interacting populations with holling type iii functional response, Nonlinear Dyn. 76 (2014) 201–220, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-1121-3. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. Z. Ma and J. Liu, Spatiotemporal dynamics induced by delay and diffusion in a predator–prey model with mutual interference among the predator, Comput. Math. Appl. 75 (2018) 3488–3507, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.02.012. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. Q. Ye and Z. Li, Introduction to Reaction–Diffusion Equations (Science Press, 1994). Google Scholar
42. C. Li and H. Zhu, Canard cycles for predator–prey systems with holling types of functional response, J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 254 (2013) 879–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2012.10.003. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. J. Hale, Asymptotic Behavior of Dissipative Systems, Vol. 25 (American Mathematical Society, 1988), http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/025. Google Scholar
44. J. Wu, Theory and Applications of Partial Functional Differential Equations (Springer-Verlag, 1996), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4050-1. Crossref, Google Scholar
45. B. Hassard, N. Kazarinoff and Y. Wan, Theory and Applications of Hopf Bifurcation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981), https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/445. Google Scholar