Research ArticleNo Access

Ni-doped, urchin-like Bi₂S₃ particles for electrocatalytic oxidation of glucose

Biao Wang

Institute of Bismuth Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

Ya Liu

Institute of Bismuth Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

Xu Huai

Institute of Bismuth Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Yuqing Miao

Institute of Bismuth Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China

E-mail Address: yqmiao@usst.edu.cn

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793604721500065Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

In order to develop non-noble metal-based electrocatalysts for glucose oxidation, the Ni-doped, urchin-like Bi₂S₃ particles were prepared by a solvothermal method using the solvent of ethylene glycol/H₂O. The obtained products were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The background signal from capacitance current is relatively low and the electrocatalytic oxidation current of glucose relatively high due to the urchin-like nanostructure of Bi₂S₃ particles and high surface area where the presence of Bi also improves the electrocatalytic performance of Ni $^{I I}$ $^{I I}$ /Ni $^{I I I}$ $^{I I I}$ shift.

Keywords:

References

1. J. B. Jiang et al., J. Mater. Sci. 54, 1422 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. M. S. Xiao et al., J. Appl. Electrochem. 47, 361 (2017). Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. Y. Zhao et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 29863 (2017). Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. K.-L. Wang et al., J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Electron. 30, 4446 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. M. Y. Gao et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43, 1805 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. D. J. Fa, B. Yu and Y. Q. Miao, Colloids Surf. A 564, 31 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. H. M. Yadav and J.-J. Lee, J. Solid State Electrochem. 23, 503 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. M. Z. Liu, Y. P. Wang and D. Y. Lu, J. Mater. Sci. 54, 3354 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. H. Zhang et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 547, 102 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. C.-H. A. Tsang, K. N. Hui and K. S. Hui, Electrochim. Acta. 258, 371 (2017). Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. D. Basu and S. Basu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36, 14923 (2011). Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. L. Long et al., Mikrochim. Acta 186, 74 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. X. Xiao et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 4689 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. C. Y. Zhai et al., Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 243, 283 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. Z. L. Chen, M. Liu and R. B. Wu, J. Catal. 361, 322 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. T. Xiao et al., Chem. Eng. J. 378, 122162 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Y. S. Yang et al., J. Alloys Compd. 764, 890 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. Y. P. Dong et al., Electrochim. Acta. 74, 189 (2012). Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. M. Zhou et al., Electrochim. Acta. 246, 9 (2017). Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. M. S. Xiao et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 7, 26101 (2015). Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. Y. H. Li et al., Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 11, 9917 (2016). Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. X. G. Zhai et al., J. Power Sources 396, 648 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. J. Grigas, E. Talik and V. Lazauskas, Phys. Stat. Sol. 232, 220 (2002). Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. Y. Tian et al., J. Mater. Sci. 50, 5443 (2015). Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. Z. Liu et al., Mater. Lett. 88, 82 (2012). Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. S. S. Raut, J. A. Dhobale and B. R. Sankapal, Physica E 87, 209 (2017). Google Scholar
27. Y. Mu et al., Biosens Bioelectron. 26, 2948 (2011). Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. Y. Q. Miao et al., Biosens Bioelectron. 53, 428 (2014). Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. S. M. El-Refaei, M. M. Saleh and M. I. Awad, J. Power Sources 223, 125 (2013). Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. A. S. Danial et al., J. Power Sources 293, 101 (2015). Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. A. M. Ahmed et al., J. Electroanal. Chem. 835, 313 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. T. Soejima, K. Takada and S. Ito, Appl. Surf. Sci. 277, 192 (2013). Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. Z. H. Li et al., RSC Adv. 9, 32898 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. A. Brouzgou, S. Song and P. Tsiakaras, Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 158–159, 209 (2014). Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. W. J. Liu et al., Nat Commun. 11, 265 (2020). Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. D. J. Fa et al., Polyhedron 144, 11 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. Y. Y. Tong et al., Electrochim. Acta 187, 11 (2016). Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. Z. Y. Yang et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, H375 (2014). Web of Science, Google Scholar