Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and occur in many healthcare facilities including hospitals, surgery centers and long-term care facilities. It is well known that some pathogens can persist on healthcare surfaces for weeks to months and spread readily to new surfaces. It is current practice to disinfect or clean surfaces routinely in order to reduce the risk of HAIs. However, routine cleaning can damage the surface chemically or mechanically, which may actually increase the surface contamination. Fundamental knowledge is therefore needed to understand the influence of cleaning and disinfection on healthcare surfaces in order to mitigate pathogen persistence. In this study, materials and objects found in healthcare facilities were selected and exposed to disinfection procedures including wiping and soaking with readily available chemical disinfectants. A variety of chemical disinfectants were selected which contain hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonia, and chlorine, respectively. Optical microscopy, contact angle measurement, atomic force microscopy (AFM), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and nanoindentation are used to analyze surface characteristics before and after disinfection in order to study the effect of disinfection on material properties. Disinfection procedures are found to cause changes to surface properties of materials and objects which can be detected and observed or quantified by the approaches used in this study. The methods should become regular practice in the studies of healthcare surfaces and their role in HAIs. Each method in this study may not be reliably applied to every object or disinfection scenario. Sample geometry and features may influence response during measurement and affect results. The combination of the approaches is able to sufficiently characterize chemical, mechanical, and topological changes to the surface.

This article contains references to supplementary material available on the journal website. The supplementary material includes additional figures which show optical microscope images and FTIR spectra of real objects used in this study, as well as one-way ANOVA results for statistical analyses.

Keywords:

References

1. S. S. Magill et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1198 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1306801 Crossref, Google Scholar
2. B. Cohen, J. Liu, A. R. Cohen and E. Larson, Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 39, 541 (2018). Crossref, Google Scholar
3. P. C. Carling, M. F. Parry and S. M. V. Beheren, Infect. Control Hosp. 29, 1 (2008). https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0195941700047469/type/journal_article Crossref, Google Scholar
4. A. Kramer, I. Schwebke and G. Kampf, BMC Infect. Dis. 6, 130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-130 Crossref, Google Scholar
5. J. D. Sexton, A. M. Wilson, H. P. Sassi and K. A. Reynolds, Am. J. Infect. Control 46, 39 (2018) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655317309495. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. H. P. Sassi, K. A. Reynolds, I. L. Pepper and C. P. Gerba, Am. J. Infect. Control 46, 507 (2018). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655317312282 Crossref, Google Scholar
7. W. A. Rutala and D. J. Weber, The Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities. 2008. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/disinfection-guidelines-H.pdf. Downloaded on July 1, 2019. Google Scholar
8. E. A. Gonzalez, P. Nandy, A. D. Lucas and V. M. Hitchins, Am. J. Infect. Control 45, 194 (2017). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019665531630815X Crossref, Google Scholar
9. I. Yoda et al., BMC Microbiol. 14, 234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0234-2 Crossref, Google Scholar
10. M. J. Giraldez et al., Optom. Vis. Sci. 87, 6 (2010). https://journals.lww.com/optvissci/Fulltext/2010/06000/Contact_Lens_Hydrophobicity_and_Roughness_Effects.9.aspx Google Scholar
11. K. Miyoshi, Surface Characterization Techniques: An Overview. Mechanical Tribology: Materials, Characterization, and Applications, Part 2 (July) (2002), pp. 1–46, http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20020070606.pdf. Google Scholar
12. N. Ohmae, J. M. Martin and S. Mori, Role of Surface Analysis. Micro and Nanotribology (ASME, New York, 2005), 16 pp. Crossref, Google Scholar
13. G. Bracco and B. Holst, Surface Science Techniques [Internet]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. (Springer Series in Surface Sciences), https://books.google.com/books?id=nUJEAAAAQBAJ. Google Scholar
14. R. N. Wenzel, J. Phys. Colloid. Chem. 53, 1466 (1949). Crossref, Google Scholar
15. W. A. Zisman, Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution, Contact Angle, Wettability, and Adhesion (American Chemical Society, 1964). p. 1 (Adv. Chem. Vol. 43). https://doi.org/10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch001 Crossref, Google Scholar
16. F. M. Fowkes, Ind. Eng. Chem. 56, 40 (1964). http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie50660a008 Crossref, Google Scholar
17. R. D. Boyd, J. Verran, M. V. Jones and M. Bhakoo, Langmuir. 18, 2343 (2002). Crossref, Google Scholar
18. R. J. Crawford, H. K. Webb, V. K. Truong, J. Hasan and E. P. Ivanova, Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 179–182, 142 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2012.06.015 Crossref, Google Scholar
19. V. K. Truong et al., Biomaterials 31, 3674 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.071 Crossref, Google Scholar
20. L. S. Loo and K. K. Gleason, Macromolecules. 36, 2587 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
21. Q. Zhou, K. Wang and L. S. Loo, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 113, 3286 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30229 Crossref, Google Scholar
22. R. M. Dukali et al., J. Serbian. Chem. Soc. 79, 867 (2014). Crossref, Google Scholar
23. G. Socrates, Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts [Internet] (Wiley, 2004). Available from: https://books.google.com/books?id=LDoAAjMnwEIChjfj. Google Scholar
24. B. Wunderlich, Pure. Appl. Chem. 67, 1019 (1995). http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/pac.1995.67.issue-6/pac199567061019/pac199567061019.xml Crossref, Google Scholar
25. W. C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 2011/01/01. 7, 1564 (1992). https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/an-improved-technique-for-determining-hardness-and-elastic-modulus-using-load-and-displacement-sensing-indentation-experiments/A53D45298E14F73B86495BBC056E16DC Crossref, Google Scholar
26. W. C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 19, 3 (2004). http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0884291400085800 Crossref, Google Scholar
27. E. Donnelly, S. P. Baker, A. L. Boskey and M. C. H. Van Der Meulen, J. Biomed. Mater. Res - Part A 77, 426 (2006). Crossref, Google Scholar
28. M. Miller, C. Bobko, M. Vandamme and F. J. Ulm, Cem. Concr. Res. 38, 467 (2008). Crossref, Google Scholar
29. M. S. Bobji and S. K. Biswas, J. Mater. Res. 13, 3227 (1998). Crossref, Google Scholar
30. E. A. Gonzalez, P. Nandy, A. D. Lucas and V. M. Hitchins, Am. J. Infect. Control, 45, 194 (2017). Crossref, Google Scholar
31. M. J. Giraldez et al., Optom. Vis. Sci. 87, (2010). Google Scholar
32. A. L. Hook, C.-Y. Chang, J. Yang, J. Luckett, A. Cockayne, S. Atkinson, Y. Mei, R. Bayston, D. J. Irvine, R. Langer, D. G. Anderson, P. Williams, M. C. Davies and M. R. Alexander, Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 868 (2012), published online 12 August 2012; corrected after print 9 May 2014. Crossref, Google Scholar