World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Postoperative Infection Related with the Total Elbow Arthroplasty (Kudo’s Prosthesis) in Rheumatoid Arthritis

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835518500078Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

    Background: Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) for the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been popularized since 1980s. The outcomes of TEA using any type of implant design for RA has been satisfactory. On the other hand, many orthopedicians experience several postoperative complications. Among them, postoperative infection has still being the most troublesome and difficult to treat. This study is to clarify the causes of postoperative infection of TEA using Kudo’s prosthesis for RA and discuss how to manage and prevent infection.

    Methods: 421 TEAs were performed for 405 cases with RA at the authors’ institute during the period between 1982 and 2007. They were followed up for 1~25 years (Av. 12.3 years). The authors examined pain, the range of motion, roentgenograms and complications postoperatively. We were able to start treatment within 4 weeks after occurrence of infection. For surgical management of infected TEAs, debridement of the synovium and removal of the prosthesis with loosening were performed for all cases. In addition, all cases have been regularly and strictly followed-up with the elbow protector to prevent recurrence of infection since 2008.

    Results: There were 98 TEAs with the postoperative complications (23.3%). Eight out of 98 TEAs were infected (1.9%). Five of eight infected TEAs were primarily at the surgical scar site infection (SSSI) (60%), unknown causes in two, hematogenous course in 1. It’s obvious that surgical scar site infection (SSSI) was the leading cause of postoperative infection in this study. Thus, the authors made the elbow proctor to avoid injuries of the skin around surgical scar site (SSS). Since 2008, all of the TEAs and revised TEAs have been applied with this protector.

    Conclusions: The authors reported 8 infected TEAs: 5 cases were revised, 2 with the brace, 1 had above the elbow amputated. The regular and meticulous follow up and application of the elbow protector were useful to prevent infection of post-TEAs using Kudo’s prosthesis in RA. Since 2008, there have been no infection of post TEAs and revised TEAs.