Original ArticleNo Access

A Comparison of the Outcomes of Fiber-Wire^® versus Stainless Steel Wire in Transosseous Wiring for Intra-Articular Fractures of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Kasumi, Hiroshima, Japan

E-mail Address: rugbyshige@gmail.com

Correspondence to: Shigeki Ishibashi, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Kasumi, 1-2-3, Minami-ku Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan. Tel: +81-82-257-5232, Fax: +81-82-257-5234.

Search for more papers by this author

Hiroki HACHISUKA

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tsuchiya General Hospital, Nakashima-cho, Hiroshima, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

Shoji SHIMOSE

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer, Kure, Hiroshima, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Nobuo ADACHI

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Kasumi, Hiroshima, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835522500692Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Background: Different surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of intra-articular fractures involving extensor tendon insertion of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ), including acute and chronic bony mallet injuries. We have been using transosseous stainless-steel wire (SSW) in select patients. In 2015, we started using a non-absorbable polyester suture (2-0 Fiber-Wire^®, Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) instead of SSWs. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of SSW and Fiber-Wire^® (FBW) in transosseous wiring for intra-articular fractures of the DIPJ.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent fixation of intra-articular fractures, including extensor tendon insertion of the DIPJ using a transosseous wiring technique, in the period from 2013 to 2018. SSW was used in the period from 2013 to 2014, and FBW was used from 2015 to 2018. Outcomes with regard to age, gender, time to union, range of motion at the DIPJ and complications were recorded and compared between the SSW and FBW groups.

Results: Nine patients (mean age: 38 years) underwent fixation with SSW and 10 patients (mean age: 31 years) with FBW. The operative time was significantly lower in the FBW group, and all the fractures united. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups with regard to time to union or range of motion at the DIPJ. Similar complication rates were observed in both groups.

Conclusions: The use of FBW in transosseous wiring for intra-articular fractures of the DIPJ can reduce operative time and provide functional results similar to that of SSWs. It can be considered as an alternative fixation technique for difficult intra-articular comminuted fractures of the DIPJ, including acute and chronic bony mallet injuries with joint subluxation.

Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic)

Keywords:

REFERENCES

1. Stern PJ, Kastrup JJ. Complications and prognosis of treatment of mallet finger. J Hand Surg Am. 1988;13(3):329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(88)80002-9. Crossref, Google Scholar
2. Leinberry C. Mallet finger injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(9):1715–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.06.018 Crossref, Google Scholar
3. Lin JS, Samora JB. Surgical and nonsurgical management of mallet finger: A systematic review. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(2):146–163.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.10.004. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
4. Bischoff R, Buechler U, De Roche R, Jupiter J. Clinical results of tension band fixation of avulsion fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19(6):1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-5023(94)90109-0. Crossref, Google Scholar
5. Lee HJ, Jeon IH, Kim PT, Oh CW. Tension wire fixation for mallet fracture after extension block pinning failed. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(5):741–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1968-x. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. Kakinoki R, Ohta S, Noguchi T,et al.. A modified tension band wiring technique for treatment of the bony mallet finger. Hand Surg. 2013;18(02):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810413500299. Link, Google Scholar
7. Maeda T, Takigawa S, Hirohara H, Kawasaki K, Inagaki K. Treatment of chronic mallet fractures with tension band wiring. J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2010;27(3):183–186. Google Scholar
8. Gosal HS, Singh P, Field RE. Clinical experience of patellar fracture fixation using metal wire or non-absorbable polyester – A study of 37 cases. Injury. 2001;32(2):129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00170-4. Crossref, Google Scholar
9. Hughes SC, Stott PM, Hearnden AJ, Ripley LG. A new and effective tension-band braided polyester suture technique for transverse patellar fracture fixation. Injury. 2007;38(2):212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.013. Crossref, Google Scholar
10. Camarda L, Morello S, Balistreri F, D’Arienzo A, D’Arienzo M. Non-metallic implant for patellar fracture fixation: A systematic review. Injury. 2016;47(8):1613–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.039. Crossref, Google Scholar
11. Carofino BC, Santangelo SA, Kabadi M, Mazzocca AD, Browner BD. Olecranon fractures repaired with FiberWire or metal wire tension banding: A biomechanical comparison. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(9):964–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.008. Crossref, Google Scholar
12. Ishiguro T, Itoh Y, Yabe Y, Hashizume N. Extension block with Kirschner wire for fracture dislocation of the distal interphalangeal joint. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 1997;1(2):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/00130911-199706000-00005. Crossref, Google Scholar
13. Kalainov DM, Hoepfner PE, Hartigan BJ, Carroll C, Genuario J IV. Nonsurgical treatment of closed mallet finger fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(3):580–586.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.02.010. Crossref, Google Scholar
14. Boileau P, Alami G, Rumian A, Schwartz DG, Trojani C, Seidl AJ. The doubled-suture nice knot. Orthopedics. 2017;40(2):e382–386. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20161202-05. Crossref, Google Scholar
15. Kronlage SC, Faust D. Open reduction and screw fixation of mallet fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29(2):135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.10.012. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
16. Teoh LC, Lee JYL. Mallet fractures: A novel approach to internal fixation using a hook plate. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007;32(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.09.007. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. McGreal G, Reidy D, Joy A, Mahalingam K, Cashman WF. The biomechanical evaluation of polyester as a tension band for the internal fixation of patellar fractures. J Med Eng Technol. 1999;23(2):53–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/030919099294285. Crossref, Google Scholar
18. Wright PB, Kosmopoulos V, Coté RE, Tayag TJ, Nana AD. FiberWire is superior in strength to stainless steel wire for tension band fixation of transverse patellar fractures. Injury. 2009;40(11):1200–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.04.011. Crossref, Google Scholar