World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

A Prospective Study of Graft Repositioning over Flap Technique for Reconstruction of Fingertip Amputation

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835523500704Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

    Background: Replantation of digital tip amputations, especially Allen III and IV, is challenging for hand surgeons as it requires a high level of microsurgical expertise and fine instruments. The graft repositioning over flap (GRF) technique is a simple and reliable procedure that provides length, sensation and nail growth and GRF has become popular in the last few years. The aim of this study is to report the short-term outcomes of the GRF technique.

    Methods: This is a prospective study of all patients who underwent a GRF reconstruction for Allen III and IV digital amputations at our hospital over a 12-month period. In addition to demographic data and injury details, we collected outcomes data with regard to flap and nailbed graft survival, capillary refill time, nail growth, sensation (2-point discrimination), bone union and gain in length of digit compared to length at injury.

    Results: Twenty patients underwent GRF reconstruction of digital amputation. They included 18 men and 2 women with an average age of 29 years. The thumb was the most frequently injured digit (n = 7). Electric saws (n = 5) and industrial machines (n = 5) accounted for 50% of injuries. Twelve amputations were Allen IV. Five patients were lost to follow-up and outcomes data was available for 15 patients. There was loss of flap and nail bed in three patients. There was no growth of nail in three patients. The distal phalanx graft was lost in six patients and united in the remaining nine patients.

    Conclusions: The GRF technique is a simple and reliable option in patients in whom replantation is not possible. It restores length, provides sensation and nail growth in the reconstructed fingers.

    Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)