World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Extra-Articular Base Fractures of the Proximal Phalanx in Adults: A Systematic Review

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500085Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

    Background: Extra-articular proximal phalanx base fractures are common in adults and can lead to permanent finger stiffness and joint contractures. The purpose of this review is to summarise the evidence for operative and non-operative management of this fracture type.

    Methods: The MedLine, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the following key terms: ‘proximal phalanx’, ‘base’, ‘fracture’, ‘repair’ and ‘fixation’. A total of 2,889 unique records were extracted. All studies with primary data on the management of extra-articular proximal phalangeal base fractures in adults were included for initial review.

    Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 441 extra-articular proximal phalanx base fractures. Outcomes were determined by final total active range of motion. 182 extra-articular proximal phalangeal base fractures were treated non-operatively, with excellent or good outcomes attained in 80% of cases. Another 259 extra-articular proximal phalangeal base fractures were treated operatively, including 236 with Kirschner wires (K-wires), 18 with plates, and five with intramedullary screws. Case-level data were available in 186 fractures managed by K-wire fixation, with excellent or good outcomes achieved in 79% of cases. Excellent or good outcomes were achieved in 35% of cases treated by plates, and 80% of five cases treated by intramedullary screw fixation. Three (1.6%) patients managed conservatively required surgery after reduction loss. No patients managed with K-wires required re-operation for reduction loss; tenolysis/capsulotomy was required in 11 (4.5%) cases for stiffness, and pin site infections occurred in eight (3.5%) cases. Complex regional pain syndrome occurred in five cases (28%) of plate fixation.

    Conclusions: In summary, excellent or good results may be achieved by K-wire pinning or conservative management. Current evidence is limited for plate or intramedullary screw fixation. Prospective trials and outcomes standardisation are needed to improve the evidence base.

    Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic)