Adipofascial Perforator Flaps for Peripheral Nerve Resurfacing after External Neurolysis
Abstract
Background: External neurolysis is an important approach to treating symptomatic peripheral nerve entrapment. In cases of recurrent neurolysis or particularly extensive neurolysis, a paucity of overlying soft tissue for closure over the freshly liberated nerve presents a challenge to long-term surgical success as primary closure of this tissue may predispose the patient to recalcitrant epineural scarring. We report the intermediate term outcomes of the use of adipofascial perforator flaps as a means of vascularised tissue resurfacing of nerves in these difficult scenarios.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing external neurolysis for painful peripheral nerve lesions who subsequently had soft tissue reconstruction with local adipofascial flaps. Data with regard to age, gender, limb involved, duration of symptoms, number of prior surgeries, operative time, type of flap, vascular basis of flap, duration of follow-up, visual analogue pain score, monofilament sensory testing and complications were collected.
Results: We included six patients (four women) with a minimum follow-up period of 17 months (range: 17–25 months). Age ranged from 39 to 60 years of age. Four cases involved the upper extremity and two the lower extremity. Symptoms had been present between 1 and 10 years. All operations utilised a local adipofascial flap perfused by a named perforating vessel emanating from an adjacent axial vessel. Operative time for flap creation and inset was 74 minutes, on average. There was one minor complication owing to superficial wound dehiscence. All patients reported substantial pain relief (≥five-point reduction on visual analogue scale; scores 0–3 at last follow-up) and objective sensory testing demonstrated improvement.
Conclusions: Our report pays particular attention to surgical technique that is applicable to both upper and lower extremities in addition to intermediate term safety and pain outcomes.
Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)
