World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
ORAL PRESENTATION: EmbryologyOpen Access

#37 : Improved Pregnancy Prediction Performance in an Updated Deep-Learning-Based Embryo Selection Model: A Retrospective Independent Validation Study Using 3,960 Single Blastocyst Transfer Cycles

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661318223742315Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
    This article is part of the issue:

    Background and Aims: Generally, the performance of deep learning models is improved by increasing the size of the training dataset. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no study on the effect of increasing training data on the performance of pregnancy prediction using the same deep-learning model.

    Method: A total of 3,960 blastocyst transfer cycles (1 patient, 1 cycle) were retrospectively analyzed. Embryos were stratified according to SART age groups. The quality and scoring of embryos were assessed by iDAScore v2.0 (iDA-V2; Vitrolife, Sweden), v1.0 (iDA-V1; Vitrolife, Sweden), and Gardner grading (GG). The discriminative performance of pregnancy prediction for each embryo scoring model was compared using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve for each maternal age group.

    Results: In the AUCs of the < 35 years age group (n = 757) for pregnancy prediction, the AUC of iDAV2 was significantly higher than that of GG (0.718 vs. 0.694, p = 0.015). For the 35-37 years age group (n = 821), the AUC of iDA-V2 was significantly higher than that of iDA-V1 (0.712 vs. 0.696, p = 0.035). In the AUCs of the 41–42 years age group (n = 715), the AUC of iDA-V2 was significantly different from that of GG (0.745 vs. 0.696, P = 0.007). In the > 42 years age group (n = 660) and 38–40 years age group (n = 1,007), there were no significant difference among the groups.

    Conclusion: The present study suggests that the performance of deep learning models for pregnancy prediction will be improved by increasing the size of the training data. Therefore, in a deep-learning model for pregnancy prediction, continuously collecting training data is an important step for improving the performance of updated AI models.

    Publisher's Note:

    This article contains the abstract sections only.