World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
ORAL PRESENTATION: Female InfertilityOpen Access

#331 : Bilateral Endometriomas Masquerading Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer (SEOC) in an Infertile Female

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661318223742753Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)
    This article is part of the issue:

    Background and Aims: Endometriomas are diagnosed in clinical practice by imaging (mostly ultrasound) in females presenting with infertility. CA-125 level is an adjuvant investigation which may be indicative of endometriosis. A few research questions that are yet to be answered. Is ultrasound a sufficient modality to diagnose endometrioma? Is there any cut off as far as the measurement of endometrioma is concerned to step up the imaging modality to MRI?

    Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) is a rare phenomenon with an incidence of 1.4 - 3.8%. Mostly in SEOC, the ovarian endometroid carcinoma arises in background of endometriosis with endometrial carcinoma of lower stage and grade in premenopausal age group.

    Method: A 32-year-old female with Severe Dysmenorrhea and Secondary infertility had clinical evidence of bilateral endometriomas of 4-5 cm on ultrasound. She underwent hysterolaparoscopy. On hysteroscopy, endometrium was polypoidal and vascular, looking suspicious for malignancy. Hence endometrial biopsy was taken. On laparoscopy, B/L ovaries were enlarged, multiloculated, solid-cystic with granular surface and adhered in POD, decision for staging laparotomy with frozen section was taken. Frozen section was suggestive of Borderline tumor. Eventually, fertility sparing surgical staging was done (BSO + infracolic omentectomy + peritoneal biopsies). Peritoneal cytology was negative for malignant cells.

    Results: Histopathological examination revealed Endometriod adenocarcinoma grade 1a/1a in both endometrial and ovarian components with no involvement of omentum and peritoneum. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated P53 to be moderately positive in endometrium and strongly positive in ovary, whereas ER, PR was positive in both tumors of endometrium and ovary and WT-1 negative in ovaries. Hence diagnosed as SEOC and not metastatic tumor. Mirena was inserted in follow up and repeat biopsy is awaited.

    Conclusion: Suspicion of ovarian endometroid carcinoma must born in mind in cases with large bilateral endometriomas with long-standing endometriosis.

    Publisher's Note:

    This article contains the abstract sections only.