Processing math: 100%
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Clinical Characteristics, Predictors for Mortality and Comparison of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and the Five-Factor Score on Survival in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in Hong Kong

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661341724500020Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

    Abstract

    Objective: To describe the clinical profile and predictors of mortality of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients in Hong Kong. To compare the accuracy of the latest Five-Factor Score (FFS-2009) and the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) in prediction of survival with this local cohort.

    Methods: A retrospective observational study on newly diagnosed AAV patients, from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2022, managed in the Kowloon West Cluster (KWC) hospitals in Hong Kong. Demographic and baseline characteristics, clinical profile, and treatment profile were reviewed. Factors associated with mortality were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards model. The performances of FFS and BVAS in mortality prediction were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

    Results: A total of 83 AAV patients were included in the study. The median age was 70.5 years at diagnosis. Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA; 69.9%) was the most common AAV subtype. The median FFS and BVAS were 2 and 20, respectively. The overall mortality was 45.6% across the study period. Multivariate Cox regression identified age at diagnosis (HR 1.043, P=0.027), stabilized peak serum creatinine (HR 1.002, P=0.001), hemoglobin level (HR 0.754, P=0.006), cardiac involvement (HR 3.862, P=0.008), and use of maintenance therapy (HR 0.261, P=0.002) as independent predictors of overall survival. Both FFS and BVAS were significant predictors of overall survival. The areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC curves suggested FFS was a good prediction tool for early mortality in 1 year, with an AUC value of 0.874.

    Conclusion: Despite the advances in treatment, AAV still carried significant morbidities with high mortality. Clinical predictors and existing scoring systems showed good predictive power on mortality.

    INTRODUCTION

    Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)- associated vasculitis (AAV) is a distinct group of systemic vasculitis with multi-organ involvement and varying clinical presentation. Three main subtypes have been described in the literature, namely granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) [1, 2]. The incidence and prevalence of each AAV vary in different localities. Studies from China and Japan suggested MPA being the most common form of AAV, with a higher prevalence of myeloperoxidase (MPO) AAV, whereas in the Western counterpart, proteinase-3 (PR3) ANCA GPA is more prevalent [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Published local data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with AAV in Hong Kong are scarce.

    The revised Five-Factor Score in 2009 (FFS-2009) (Supplementary Figure 1A) is recommended in international guidelines for initial treatment decisions [8, 9, 10]. The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) (Supplementary Figure 1B) is a validated activity scoring system frequently used in therapeutic studies of systemic vasculitis to document disease activity. A previous study suggested that higher BVAS at baseline confers a greater mortality risk [11]. Previous overseas registry suggested both FFS-2009 and BVAS were independent factors related to mortality, with the 2009 FFS showing better accuracy in predicting mortality upon initial diagnosis [12].

    The aim of this study was to describe the clinical profile and predictors of mortality of AAV patients managed in the three regional hospitals (Caritas Medical Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, and Yan Chai Hospital) in Hong Kong. The performances of FFS-2009 and BVAS in predicting mortality among AAV patients were reviewed with this local cohort.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Data were extracted from the hospital authority (HA) electronic system to identify patients with AAV being managed in the three local hospitals from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2022. Patients with diagnosis codes of MPA [446.0(2)], necrotizing vasculopathy [446.0(7), 446.0(8)], polyarteritis [446.0(9)], Wegener’s granulomatosis [446.4], Churg–Strauss syndrome with glomerulonephritis [710.8(1)], and arteritis unspecified [447.6], according to the ninth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) were reviewed. Patients were included if they were adults aged 18 or above at diagnosis and fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria [13, 14, 15, 16] or the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) definition (1) of AAV, with the consideration of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) algorithm [17]. Drug-induced AAV and AAV overlapping with other connective tissue diseases were excluded.

    Patient demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis type, date of diagnosis, ANCA specificities, clinical presentations, laboratory findings, histology results, treatment profile, and the disease course were reviewed. FFS-2009 and BVAS at initial diagnosis were calculated retrospectively for each included patient and analyzed.

    Definition

    The date of AAV diagnosis was defined as follows: start of treatment with prednisolone 30mg per day or equivalent glucocorticoid; if untreated or missing data, the day of biopsy; and if no biopsy, the day of the first positive ANCA test result [18]. Proteinuria was measured by 24-hour urine protein or an equivalent spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio. The clinical profile was documented according to BVAS and FFS items. Pulmonary-renal syndrome (PRS) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50mL/min/1.73m2, with evidence of microscopic hematuria and pulmonary hemorrhage [19]. Pulse steroid therapy was defined as the administration of intravenous methylprednisolone 500mg daily, or equivalent, during initial treatment [8, 19]. Maintenance therapy was defined as administering non-glucocorticoid immunosuppressive agents after 6 months of initial induction therapy [20, 21].

    Statistical analyses

    Categorical data were reported as frequency (percentage) and compared using the Fisher’s exact test or the Pearson chi-square test. Continuous variables with a normal distribution were reported as the mean (standard deviation [SD]), and continuous variables with a non-normal distribution were reported as the median (interquartile range [IQR]). They were compared with parametric tests (student’s t-test or one- way ANOVA) or nonparametric tests (Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test). Univariate analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of mortality. Clinically significant variables with P<0.1 in univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analyses were conducted with the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The accuracy of BVAS and FFS in the prediction of mortality was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Their respective areas under the curve (AUC) were compared using the DeLong test. The optimal cut-off value for BVAS in the prediction of mortality was determined by the Youden index. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Statistics Package for Social Sciences (version 29.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

    Ethical approval

    The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consents were waived in view of the retrospective nature of the study. This study was approved by the KWC Research Ethics Committee (KW/EX-22-050(172-06)).

    RESULTS

    Demographics

    Eighty-three AAV patients were included in the study for analysis (Supplementary Figure 2). The median follow- up duration was 23 months (IQR 3, 49). The baseline demographics at diagnosis are shown in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis was 70.5 (IQR 68.7, 78.2). MPA patients were significantly older at diagnosis, comprising more than two-thirds of the cohort. One-third of the EGPA cases were ANCA-negative. A significantly higher proportion of patients with EGPA had preexisting asthma at the time of initial diagnosis.

    Table 1. Baseline demographic of the entire cohort.

    All patients (n=83)MPA (n=58)GPA (n=10)EGPA (n=15)P-value
    Female sex, no. (%)41 (49.4)32 (55.2)3 (30.0)6 (40.0)0.244
    Age at diagnosis (years) [IQR]70.5 [63.7, 78.3]74.0 [67.8, 79.8]56.2 [43.2, 64.9]64.7 [60.7, 69.9]<0.001
    >65 years old at diagnosis, no. (%)57 (68.7)48 (82.8)2 (20.0)7 (46.7)<0.001
    Ever smoker, no.a (%)28 (35.0)20 (36.4)4 (40.0)4 (26.7)0.767
    ANCA, no. (%)<0.001
    Negative5 (6.0)0 (0)0 (0)5 (33.3)
    Positive
    MPO-ANCA67 (80.7)57 (98.3)0 (0)10 (66.7)
    PR3-ANCA11 (13.3)1 (1.7)10 (100)0 (0)
    Comorbid conditions, no. (%)
    Hypertension43 (51.8)30 (51.7)5 (50.0)8 (53.3)1.000
    Hypercholesterolemia29 (34.9)24 (41.4)1 (10.0)4 (26.7)0.122
    Diabetes10 (12.0)8 (13.8)0 (0)2 (13.3)0.669
    Asthma10 (12.0)1 (1.7)0 (0)9 (60.0)<0.001

    aSmoking status was available in 80 patients.

    Clinical characteristics and laboratory features

    The initial clinical manifestations are summarized in Tables 2A, B. Fewer MPA patients had ENT symptoms (P<0.001 for GPA and P=0.097 for EGPA). GPA patients had more eye and mucosal features (P<0.001 for both MPA and EGPA), as well as gastrointestinal features (P=0.067 for MPA, P=0.017 for EGPA). More EGPA patients had neurological involvement (P<0.001 for MPA, P=0.007 for GPA) and cutaneous manifestation at presentation. EGPA patients had significantly less renal manifestation, when compared with MPA (P=0.029) but not GPA (P=0.125). Laboratory findings are shown in Table 2C. The median peak serum creatinine and the eGFR were 229μmol/L (IQR 102, 553) and 19.5mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR 8.55, 48.0), respectively. Twenty-four patients (28.9%) had eGFR 10mL/min/1.73m2. MPA patients presented with significantly lower hemoglobin (P=0.001) and worse kidney function (P<0.001).

    Table 2A. Initial clinical presentation by BVAS.

    P-value
    All patients (n=83)MPA (n=58)GPA (n=10)EGPA (n=15)OverallMPA vs. GPAMPA vs. EGPAGPA vs. EGPA
    BVAS domain, no. (%)
    General154 (65.1)39 (67.2)8 (80.0)7 (46.7)0.2330.7110.2290.211
    Skin222 (26.5)9 (15.5)3 (30.0)10 (66.7)<0.0010.365<0.0010.111
    Eye and mucosal39 (10.8)2 (3.4)7 (70.0)0 (0)<0.001<0.0011.000<0.001
    Ear, nose, and throat412 (14.5)3 (5.2)6 (60.0)3 (20)<0.001<0.0010.0970.087
    Respiratory550 (60.2)36 (62.1)8 (80.0)6 (40)0.1470.4750.1500.099
    Cardiovascular69 (10.8)7 (12.1)1 (10.0)1 (6.7)1.0001.0001.0001.000
    Gastrointestinal712 (14.5)8 (13.8)4 (40.0)0 (0)0.0180.0670.1930.017
    Renal876 (91.6)55 (94.8)10 (100)11 (73.3)0.0351.0000.0290.125
    Neurological938 (45.8)20 (34.5)4 (40.0)14 (93.3)<0.0010.733<0.0010.007
    Number of organ systems involved; median [IQR]4 [2.0, 4.0]3 [2.0, 4.0]5 [4.0, 6.0]3 [2.5, 4.5]<0.001<0.0010.3410.006
    BVAS, median [IQR]20 [14.0, 27.0]19.5 [13.0, 28.0]26.5 [21.0, 35.0]19.0 [14.5, 23.0]0.0200.0070.5950.012

    Footnotes—Frequent manifestations in each domain:

    1Fever 38C (36.1%), myalgia (24.1%).

    2Purpura (24.1%), gangrene (3.6%).

    3Conjunctivitis/blepharitis/keratitis (4.8%).

    4Sensorineural hearing loss (6.0%).

    5Infiltrate (55.4%), pleural effusion/pleurisy (20.5%), respiratory failure (21.7%), alveolar hemorrhage (14.5%), pulmonary renal syndrome (12.0%).

    6Congestive heart failure (8.4%), cardiomyopathy (6%).

    7Bloody diarrhea (13.3%).

    8Proteinuria (86.7%), acute renal impairment (71.1%), microscopic hematuria (55.4%).

    9Sensory peripheral neuropathy (30.1%), mononeuritis multiplex (25.3%), stroke 6%).

    Table 2B. Initial clinical presentation by FFS.

    All patients (n=83)MPA (n=58)GPA (n=10)EGPA (n=15)P-value
    FFS-2009 items, no. (%)
    Age>6557 (68.7)48 (82.8)2 (20.0)7 (46.7)<0.001
    Stabilized peak creatininemia 150μmol/L56 (67.5)46 (79.3)7 (70.0)3 (20.0)<0.001
    Cardiac insufficiency6 (7.2)5 (8.6)1 (10.0)0 (0)0.649
    Gastrointestinal involvement12 (14.5)8 (13.8)4 (40.0)0 (0)0.018
    Absence of ENT symptoms69 (83.1)55 (94.8)4 (40.0)10 (66.7)<0.001
    FFS-2009 by category, no. (%)0.040
    07 (8.4)4 (6.9)2 (20.0)1 (6.7)
    126 (31.3)14 (24.1)3 (30.0)9 (60.0)
    250 (60.2)40 (69.0)5 (50.0)5 (33.3)
    FFS-2009 score
    median [IQR]2 [1, 2]2 [1, 2]1.5 [1, 3]1 [1, 2]0.100

    Table 2C. Laboratory findings at initial diagnosis.

    All patientsMPAGPAEGPAP-value
    ESR, mm/ha83.5 [55, 110]91.0 [59, 115]98.0 [86, 108]55.0 [50, 77.0]0.021
    CRP, mg/Lb72.7 [32.2, 133]75.5 [37, 130]110 [49.5, 165]59.0 [33, 89.0]0.472
    Hemoglobin, g/Lc9.75 [7.95, 11.2]8.80 [7.70, 10.0]10.6 [9.25, 12.4]11.3 [11.1, 12.3]0.001
    WCC×109Lc13.1 [9.10, 17.3]12.7 [9.14, 15.6]13.3 [10.9, 17.7]20.7 [15.0, 24.5]0.014
    Neutrophil×109Lc9.30 [6.33, 13.0]10.9 [7,27, 13.5]10.1 [9.25, 15.9]7.70 [6.50, 9.07]0.057
    Lymphocyte×109Lc1.00 [0.723, 1.50]1.05 [0.80, 1.40]0.90 [0.75, 1.19]1.95 [0.90, 2.60]0.135
    Eosinophil×109Lc0.22 [0.04, 0.60]0.20 [0.00, 0.40]0.20 [0.00, 0.40]10.5 [2.20, 13.3]<0.001
    Platelet×109Lc282 [217, 378]328 [221, 399]292 [252, 501]305 [227, 495]0.600
    Serum peak creatinine, μmol/L229 [102, 553]321 [143, 486]167 [110, 250]91.0 [80.0, 102]<0.001
    eGFR by MDRD, mL/min/1.73m219.5 [8.55, 48.0]16.2 [9.04, 33.0]33.8 [23.6, 52.7]65.1 [48.0, 78.7]<0.001
    Proteinuria, mg/mgd1.03 [0.42, 2.11]1.28 [0.70, 2.18]0.74 [0.37, 2.31]0.33 [0.20, 0.45]0.030

    The above figures were presented in median [Q1, Q3]. aESR available in 66 patients. bCRP available in 72 patients. cHemoglobin, WCC, neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, platelet available in 82 patients. dUrine protein is available in 76 patients.

    Treatment profile

    Treatment profiles are summarized in Table 3. About two-thirds of the cohort received an intravenous pulse steroid. Apart from steroids, cyclophosphamide was the most frequently used induction agent. Nearly one-third of patients required temporary renal replacement therapy during the initial phase. Fifty (60.2%) patients received maintenance therapy with non-glucocorticoid agents at 6 months. Azathioprine was the most frequently administered first-line maintenance agent. About one-third of patients did not receive any prophylaxis for pneumocystis infection.

    Table 3. Treatment profile.

    All patients (n=83)MPA (n=58)GPA (n=10)EGPA (n=15)P-value
    Induction agents, ever
    Glucocorticoid81 (97.6)56 (96.6)10 (100)15 (100)1.000
    Pulse steroid55 (66.3)43 (74.1)7 (70.0)5 (33.3)0.010
    Cyclophosphamidea40 (48.2)26 (44.8)5 (50.0)9 (60.0)0.583
    Oral19 (22.9)13 (22.4)3 (30.0)3 (20.0)0.843
    Intravenous22 (26.5)14 (24.1)2 (20.0)6 (40.0)0.468
    Rituximabb18 (21.7)14 (24.1)3 (30.0)1 (6.7)0.315
    Methotrexate1 (1.2)1 (1.7)0 (0)0 (0)1.000
    Azathioprine6 (7.2)2 (3.4)1 (10.0)3 (20.0)0.053
    MMF8 (9.6)8 (13.8)0 (0)0 (0)0.149
    IVIG4 (4.8)3 (5.2)1 (10.0)0 (0)0.613
    Plasmapheresis19 (22.9)16 (27.6)3 (30.0)0 (0)0.066
    RRT23 (27.7)19 (32.8)4 (40.0)0 (0)0.022
    PCP prophylaxis, ever
    Cotrimoxazole46 (55.4)32 (55.2)6 (60.0)8 (53.3)1.000
    Pentamidine11 (13.3)10 (17.2)1 (10.0)0 (0)0.171
    Other agents1 (1.2)1 (1.7)0 (0)0 (0)1.000
    No PCP prophylaxis26 (31.3)16 (27.6)3 (30.0)7 (46.7)0.430
    First maintenance agent (apart from steroids)
    Cyclophosphamide0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)n/a
    Rituximab1 (1.2)1 (1.7)0 (0)0 (0)1.000
    Methotrexate2 (2.4)1 (1.7)0 (0)1 (6.7)0.514
    Azathioprine38 (45.8)24 (41.4)4 (40.0)10 (66.7)0.195
    MMF9 (10.8)7 (12.1)1 (10.0)1 (6.7)0.871
    No additional agent33 (39.8)25 (43.1)5 (50.0)3 (20.0)0.216

    aOne patient received both oral and intravenous cyclophosphamide as an initial induction.

    bTwo patients received intravenous cyclophosphamide and rituximab sequentially. Seventeen out of 18 patients receiving rituximab were diagnosed in or after 2018 (OR 21.1). During the same period since 2018, 19 patients received cyclophosphamide as first-line induction therapy (OR 0.536). There is increasing use of rituximab as first-line therapy in Hong Kong.

    Mortality

    Thirty-seven (44.6%) patients died in the study period. Nineteen (22.9%)patients died at the same index admission. Among those deceased, the median time to death was 95 days [IQR 29, 1302]. The 30-day, 1-year, 5-year mortality rates were 10.8%, 30.1%, and 38.6%, respectively (Table 4). In subgroup analysis, patients with EGPA had significantly longer follow-up periods, median survival, and time to mortality events (Figures 1A and 1B).

    Figure 1A.

    Figure 1A. Kaplan–Meier survival curve of the entire cohort.

    Figure 1B.

    Figure 1B. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for AAV patients according to their subtype.

    Table 4. Summary table on survival data.

    All patients (n=83)MPA (n=58)GPA (n=10)EGPA (n=15)P-value
    Follow-up period (months), median [IQR]23 [3, 49]11 [2, 46]16 [2, 43]50 [37, 99]0.001
    [min, max]a[6, 3935][6, 3844][16, 3046][132, 3935]
    Median survival (months) [95% CI]87 [45, 130]70 [14, 125]43 [0, 92]110 [80, 139]0.037
    Mortality, no. (%)
    30-days9 (10.8)7 (12.1)2 (20.0)0 (0)0.223
    1-year25 (30.1)22 (37.9)3 (30.0)0 (0)0.006
    5-years32 (38.6)24 (41.4)5 (50.0)3 (20.0)0.228
    Overall37 (44.6)26 (44.8)5 (50.0)6 (40.0)0.888
    In-hospital mortality in the same admission, no. (%)19 (22.9)16 (27.6)3 (30.0)0 (0)0.039
    Time to mortality event (days), median [IQR]95 [29, 1302]54 [24, 140]50 [27, 544]2204 [1476, 3333]0.002

    aThe range of follow-up period was expressed in terms of days.

    Predictors of mortality in the AAV cohort

    Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed (Tables 5A and 5B). In the multivariate Cox regression model, five clinical predictors were shown to be associated with overall mortality, including age (HR 1.043, for each additional year of age, P=0.027), stabilized peak serum creatinine (HR 1.002, for every unit increase, P=0.001), hemoglobin level (HR 0.754, for each unit decrease, P=0.006), cardiac involvement (HR 3.862, P=0.008), and the use of maintenance therapy (HR 0.261, P=0.002).

    Table 5A. Potential clinical predictors (with P¡ 0.1) on overall mortality by univariate Cox regression modeling.

    Univariate analysis
    Clinical predictorsUnadjusted HR[95% CI]P-value
    Demographics
    Age (every one year)1.081[1.043, 1.122]<0.001
    Premorbid conditions
    Dementia3.553[1.355, 9.315]0.010
    AAV subtype
    EGPA(reference)
    non-EGPA2.651[0.994, 7.069]0.051
    MPA2.605[0.965, 7.034]0.059
    GPA2.915[0.819, 10.376]0.099
    Laboratory data
    CRP1.004[1.000, 1.009]0.079
    Hb0.691[0.595, 0.802]<0.001
    Neutrophil count1.044[1.011, 1.077]0.008
    Lymphocyte count0.225[0.107, 0.473]<0.001
    Eosinophil count0.908[0.810, 1.017]0.096
    Platelet count0.996[0.993, 1.000]0.026
    Stabilized Peak Serum Creatinine1.003[1.002, 1.004]<0.001
    eGFR0.953[0.932, 0.974]<0.001
    Treatment profile
    Temporary RRT7.873[3.890, 15.934]<0.001
    Plasmapheresis2.835[1.385, 5.803]0.004
    Any non-glucocorticoid maintenance therapy0.121[0.057, 0.256]<0.001
    Azathioprine0.188[0.084, 0.420]<0.001
    FFS score3.640[2.374, 5.581]<0.001
    Age>653.241[1.391, 7.554]0.006
    Cr1507.386[2.557, 21.336]<0.001
    Cardiac insufficiency14.677[5.184, 41.552]<0.001
    GI involvement4.001[1.763, 9.079]0.001
    Absence of ENT2.163[0.762, 6.134]0.147
    BVAS
    Number of organ involvement1.257[0.970, 1.628]0.083
    BVAS score (for each unit score increment)1.070[1.028, 1.114]0.001
    Respiratory domain2.731[1.279, 5.828]0.009
    Pleural effusion/pleurisy2.873[1.401, 5.891]0.004
    Infiltrate2.159[1.073, 4.344]0.031
    Massive hemoptysis/alveolar hemorrhage3.107[1.388, 6.957]0.006
    Respiratory failure5.558[2.770, 11.150]<0.001
    Cardiovascular domain6.144[2.712, 13.918]<0.001
    Cardiomyopathy6.313[2.396, 16.638]<0.001
    Congestive heart failure7.686[3.254, 18.158]<0.001
    Gastrointestinal domain4.001[1.763, 9.070]0.001
    Peritonitis5.623[1.298, 24.359]0.021
    Bloody diarrhea3.705[1.596, 8.598]0.002
    Renal domain2.190[0.523, 9.171]0.283
    Hypertension2.964[1.453, 6.044]0.003
    Hematuria 10 RBCs/hpf2.699[1.324, 5.504]0.006
    Peak serum creatinine level in μmol/L
    <125(Reference)
    125–2491.032[0.185, 5.754]0.971
    250–4997.630[2.423, 24.031]<0.001
    50018.873[5.903, 60.338]<0.001
    Acute renal injury6.900[2.371, 20.074]<0.001
    Neurological domain0.402[0.197, 0.822]0.012
    Cerebrovascular accidents3.629[1.269, 10.379]0.016
    Sensory peripheral neuropathy0.457[0.207, 1.010]0.053
    Mononeuritis multiplex0.266[0.101, 0.700]0.007
    Pulmonary-renal syndrome4.760[1.954, 11.594]<0.001
    Other clinical outcomes
    Infection required hospitalization within 1 year of diagnosis5.299[2.184, 12.858]<0.001
    Stage 5 CKD or dialysis dependence at 1 year35.534[3.104, 406.741]0.004

    Table 5B. Independent clinical predictors of overall mortality by multivariate Cox regression modeling.

    Clinical predictorsAdjusted HR95% Confidence intervalP-value
    Age at diagnosis1.043[1.005, 1.082]0.027
    Stabilized peak serum creatinine1.002[1.001, 1.003]0.001
    Hemoglobin level0.754[0.618, 0.921]0.006
    Cardiac involvement3.862[1.426, 10.46]0.008
    Use of maintenance therapy0.261[0.110, 0.621]0.002

    aFFS and BVAS were not included in the multivariate regression model because their composite items were analyzed separately.

    The performances of FFS-2009 and BVAS in prediction of survival among AAV patients

    The FFS-2009 was significantly higher among the non-survivors when compared with the survivors (P<0.001). The BVAS was also higher among those deceased than those who lived (20.0±8.14 vs. 16.95±7.47, respectively; P=0.044) (Table 6).

    Table 6. Comparison of FFS-2009 score and BVAS score between survivors and non-survivors.

    Survivor (n=46)Non-survivor (n=37)P-value
    FFS
    Mean±SD1.30±0.7562.30±0.878
    Median [IQR]1 [1, 2]2 [2, 3]<0.001
    BVAS
    Mean±SD19.5±7.0023.8±9.49
    Median [IQR]20 [13, 23]22 [18, 29]0.044

    The overall survival of patients with FFS-2009 scores of 0, 1, and 2 was 85.7%, 84.6%, 36%, respectively (P<0.001) (Figure 2A). When cases were stratified between FFS<2 and FFS 2, the overall survival rate was significantly lower among the group with higher FFS (84.8% vs. 36.0%, P<0.001, log-rank test P<0.001), as shown in Figure 2B. By univariate Cox regression, the hazard ratio of FFS 2 was 8.056 (P<0.001, 95% CI [3.046, 21.307]).

    Figure 2A.

    Figure 2A. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for AAV patients according to their FFS category.

    Figure 2B.

    Figure 2B. Kaplan–Meier survival curves by FFS category (scores <2 and 2).

    ROC analysis of BVAS revealed an optimal cut- off value of 15.5 (sensitivity 88.2%, specificity 38.6%, Youden index 0.268). A cut-off score of 16 was chosen. The hazard ratio of BVAS 16 was 2.99 (P=0.024, 95% CI [1.158, 7.721]). ROC analysis for the overall survival of the entire cohort yielded AUC values of 0.794 (95% CI [0.697, 0.892]) and 0.629 (95% CI [0.508, 0.750]) for FFS-2009 and BVAS, respectively, suggesting that FFS-2009 had better accuracy in predicting overall survival at the time of diagnosis in patients with AAV (AUC difference 0.165, 95% CI [0.038, 0.293], P=0.011) (Figure 3A).

    Figure 3.

    Figure 3. (A–C) ROC curves for comparing the accuracy of FFS-2009 and BVAS to predict overall survival, 1-year survival, and 5-year survival.

    The ROC curves of FFS-2009 and BVAS were denoted by the blue and green lines, respectively.

    Similar results were observed when we compared the performance of the FFS-2009 to that of BVAS in predicting our cohort’s 1-year and 5-year survival (Figures 3B and 3C). For 1-year survival, ROC analysis yielded AUC values of 0.874 (95% CI [0.800, 0.948]) and 0.700 (95% CI [0.577, 0.823]) for the FFS and the BVAS, respectively. For 5-year survival, ROC analysis yielded AUC values of 0.818 (95% CI [0.722, 0.913]) for FFS-2009 and 0.629 (95% CI [0.506, 0.753]) for BVAS.

    DISCUSSION

    Previous publications [4, 5, 6, 22, 23] suggested significant geographical variation regarding AAV patients’ demographic and baseline characteristics between the East and the West. In our cohort, MPA was the most common subtype of AAV, accounting for 70% of total cases. MPO-ANCA was tested positive in 81% of all cases. PR3-ANCA was detected almost exclusively in GPA only. These results echoed the findings from previous Asian studies [3, 7].

    AAV usually occurs in the sixth decade of life [5]. MPA patients tend to be older when compared with other AAV subtypes. Our cohort’s median age at diagnosis was 71, which was numerically higher than that in overseas cohorts [5, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. The median age at diagnosis of MPA in the current cohort was 74, significantly older than that of GPA and EGPA, with medians of 56 and 65, respectively. This finding was similar to reports from other parts of the world [5, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].

    Each AAV subtype has a known predilection for different organ systems [5, 30]. Both MPA and GPA have frequent renal involvement. About 80% of MPA and GPA cases in our cohort showed acute renal impairment. In contrast, severe renal involvement was uncommon in EGPA. While 10%–20% of the MPA and GPA cases presented with PRS at diagnosis, none of the EGPA cases developed PRS or required temporary RRT. Cutaneous and peripheral nervous involvement were frequently observed in EGPA patients, up to 70% and over 90%, respectively. However, those features were less commonly reported in patients with other AAV subtypes. The abdominal, respiratory, and cardiac involvement frequencies were comparable to overseas cohorts [24, 25, 26]. In contrast, our cohort’s ENT, eye, and mucosal involvement frequencies (Table 2A) were relatively low compared to cohorts overseas, possibly due to lower proportions of GPA and EGPA cases. Further subgroup analysis on EGPA, based on the ANCA status, was impossible with the small sample size. A meta-analysis of 24 EGPA cohorts suggested apparent differences in the pattern of organ involvement between ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative EGPA. Peripheral neuropathy, renal involvement, and cutaneous purpura were more often seen in ANCA-positive EGPA; Pulmonary infiltrates and cardiac involvement were more frequent in ANCA-negative EGPA [31].

    Our cohort may be represented by AAV patients with more severe and active disease at the initial presentation. Over 60% of our cases fell into the worst FFS category group (FFS-2009 2). In contrast with the cohort of the French Vasculitis Study Group, only about 15% of the entire cohort had FFS 2; one-third of the cohort had FFS of 1; and around half of their cases had FFS of 0 [10].

    In our cohort, half of the mortality occurred in the first admission for AAV, which is an alarming finding. The diseasese verity may partly explain the high mortality risk in the initial phase. Nevertheless, treatment-related complications like infection also contributed to the mortality. To reduce the high mortality, a high index of suspicion for potential cases, early establishment of diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and optimization of induction treatment, while balancing the risk of over-immunosuppression, are of utmost importance.

    The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 69.9% and 61.4%, respectively, in our cohort. The findings were comparable to an earlier systemic review in 2008, which reported the 5-year survival of AAV patients was 69%–91% for GPA, 45%–76% for MPA, and 60%–97% for EGPA [32]. In more recent studies, the 5-year survival rate of AAV patients improved to around 80%–90% [27, 28, 29, 33]. Such survival improvement was also demonstrated in a retrospective study by the French Vasculitis Study Group. It analyzed the mortality data of patients with systemic necrotizing vasculitis from their registry from before 1980 to after 2010. The 5-year survival rate improved from 72.2% (before 1980) to 94.5% (after 2010), with a decrease in mortality by three-fold [34].

    The increasing availability of alternative induction agents, for example, rituximab and non- cyclophosphamide maintenance therapy, is expected to mitigate the dose-dependent cancer risk and toxicity due to the alkylating agent. The advocation of a reduced-dose glucocorticoid regimen and the use of PCP prophylaxis, supported by more recent clinical studies [19, 35] and international guidelines [8, 36], is expected to reduce the risk of infection due to heavy immunosuppression. These changes are going to improve the clinical outcomes of AAV patients.

    In our study, we identified five independent clinical variables with significantly greater risk of death by multivariate Cox regression analysis: increasing age, higher peak serum creatinine, cardiovascular involvement, lower hemoglobin level, and the absence of non-glucocorticoid maintenance therapy. These independent risk factors were also reported in previous studies on mortality risk factors in patients with AAV [7, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 33]. The first three factors were the components of the FFS, frequently used in daily practice for prognostication and decisions on the initial treatment strategy. Patients with severe disease manifestations may present with a lower initial hemoglobin level due to systemic inflammation, renal failure, or acute blood loss, for example, gastrointestinal bleeding and alveolar hemorrhage [33]. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, gastrointestinal bleeding and alveolar hemorrhage were identified as significant predictors of overall survival. The finding of neurological involvement as a protective factor in the univariate analysis should be interpreted with caution, as it was no longer significant after adjustment with age and serum creatinine level. ENT manifestation was included in the FFS as a protective factor. Previous studies on GPA and EGPA suggested the presence of ENT manifestations was associated with a better prognosis in terms of mortality [28, 29]. However, this association was not apparent in patients with MPA [27]. In our study, ANCA status was not shown to be a predictor of overall survival. The association between MPO-ANCA positivity and increased mortality risk was controversial. While some studies did not reveal any association between ANCA status and mortality [7, 24, 26, 27, 33], some suggested MPO-ANCA positivity, when compared with PR3- ANCA positivity, was associated with an increased risk of mortality [25, 28], possibly due to more frequent severe renal involvement in patients with positive MPO-ANCA.

    Our results suggested that both FFS-2009 and BVAS at initial diagnosis can predict mortality. Both higher FFS (FFS 2) and higher BVAS (BVAS 16) were associated with an increased risk of mortality by up to 8-fold and 3-fold, respectively. FFS-2009 demonstrated better discriminating power in assessing early mortality events at 1 year (AUC value=0.874) than late mortality at 5 years (AUC value=0.818) and the overall survival (AUC value=0.794). FFS-2009 performed better than BVAS (AUC values range from 0.629 to 0.700) in mortality prediction. One possible reason for the inferiority of BVAS in predicting mortality was that, despite the comprehensiveness of BVAS in evaluating AAV cases, some domains, like general, cutaneous, eye, andmucosal, werenotsignificantpredictorsofmortality. On the other hand, FFS included only five items, all with substantial prognostic impact. In clinical practice, FFS appears to be a better tool at initial assessment for its simplicity and reasonably good performance in predicting mortality. Yet, BVAS still plays a vital role in AAV assessment since it enables ongoing interval assessment of serial changes. For this reason, BVAS was recommended by EULAR in 2007 as the tool to define treatment response, remission, and relapse in AAV [37]. Our finding aligned with a recent study by the Spanish group [25], which included 550 AAV patients in its registry, analyzing the performance of FFS and BVAS in predicting survival. They concluded that FFS and BVAS were significantly related to death, with FFS-2009 being the stronger predictor with a hazard ratio of 2.9. Similarly, ROC analysis revealed FFS has better accuracy in the prediction of survival than BVAS. The AUC values for 1-year, 5-year, and overall survival were 0.80, 0.78, and 0.74 for FFS-2009, whereas for BVAS, they were 0.49, 0.56, and 0.60, respectively.

    Limitations and future direction

    Due to the retrospective and observational nature of this study, unstandardized data collection could lead to significant systematic errors. Subtle clinical manifestations might be overlooked and left unrecorded. The time of symptom onset was often unavailable in the record, making the assessment of diagnostic delay difficult. The date of diagnosis was retrospectively defined by the time of treatment initiation, commonly with at least moderate to high doses of glucocorticoid [18]. Since FFS and BVAS were backdated and missing data were unavoidable, the computed scores could be overestimated in FFS (e.g., ENT symptoms) or underestimated in BVAS. The number of GPA and EGPA cases was small in this cohort, which reduces its generalizability and limits further subgroup analyses due to a lack of power.

    The current study included AAV patients from three centers in a retrospective manner. It provided insights into the clinical characteristics of AAV in this locality. A Hong Kong territory-wide study with a prospective design manner will allow a much more precise case definition, facilitate the collection of patient data, and enable a broader understanding of the local disease pattern, treatment profile, and prognosis. Establishing a local vasculitis registry will also allow better coordination and communication in handling cases among different rheumatology centers in Hong Kong.

    The latest ACR AAV classification criteria in 2022 appear less complicated and easier to use for defining the cases for inclusion when compared with the old ones and the EMA algorithm [1, 14, 15, 16, 17]. However, further validation studies may be necessary before applying them locally.

    In conclusion, despite the advances in treatment, AAV carries significant morbidities with high mortality, with 1-year and 5-year mortality rates of about 30% and 40%, respectively, in this cohort. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested several features, including older age, worse renal function at diagnosis, lower hemoglobin level and cardiovascular involvement, and a lack of non-glucocorticoid maintenance therapy, were independent predictors of mortality. The FFS at initial diagnosis appears to be a better tool than BVAS in predicting mortality, especially for early mortality at 1 year, with an AUC value of 0.874.

    FUNDING STATEMENT

    There was no funding for this work.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST

    All authors reported no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

    ORCID

    Joshua Ka Ho Yeung  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5855-1089

    Joyce Kit Yu Young  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2955-3154

    APPENDIX

    Supplementary Figure 1A.

    Supplementary Figure 1A. Revised Five-Factor Score (2009).

    Modified from Reference 10.

    Supplementary Figure 1B.

    Supplementary Figure 1B. Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (version 3).

    Modified from Reference 11.

    Supplementary Figure 2.

    Supplementary Figure 2. Enrollment Flow Chart.