Effects of Secukinumab on Enthesiophyte and Erosion Progression in Psoriatic Arthritis-A One-year Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial Utilizing High-resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography

Background

This study aimed to ascertain the effect of secukinumab on erosion and enthesiophyte progression in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).

Methods

This was a one-year double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT0362386740). Patients with erosion in the metacarpophalangeal joints (MCPJ) 2-4 were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the secukinumab or placebo group. HR-pQCT of the MCPJ 2-4 were performed at baseline, week-24 and 1-year. Progression of enthesiophyte were defined as changes in enthesiophyte volume exceeding smallest detectable change (SDC) (0.12mm³) or the identification of any new enthesiophyte. Partial repair of erosion was defined as a reduction in erosion volume greater than SDC (0.1mm³).

Results

Forty patients (age: 51.9± 13.4 years, 20 [50%] male) were recruited. Thirty-four patients who completed study treatment were included in the per-protocol analysis. The erosion volume at baseline, week-24 and week-48 revealed significant reduction in the secukinumab group while no differences in the placebo group (Figure-3A). There was a trend suggesting that fewer patients developed new-erosions in the secukinumab group (one-erosion in one-patient) compared to the placebo group (six-erosions in five-patients) (p=0.078) (Figure-3B). A significantly higher proportion of erosions with partial healing was observed in the secukinumab group compared with the placebo group [51%vs30%, p=0.029] (Figure-3C). Regarding enthesiophyte, a total of 25-enthesiophytes were identified in both the secukinumab and placebo groups at baseline. The enthesiophyte volume at baseline, week-24 and week-48 revealed significant differences in the secukinumab group while no differences in the placebo group (Figure-3D). While one (one-enthesiophyte in one-patient) and four-enthesiophytes (four-enthesiophytes in three-patients) were newly identified in the secukinumab group and placebo group respectively (Figure-3E), the proportion of enthesiophyte progression was numerically higher in the placebo group than the secukinumab group [40%vs16%, p=0.114] at week 48 (Figure-3F). GEE results showed that the odds ratio (OR) for enthesiophyte progression in the secukinumab group was 0.264 (95% CI: 0.080-0.878, p=0.030), while the OR for partial erosion healing in the secukinumab group was 2.816 (95% CI: 1.109 to 7.153, p=0.029), adjusting for tender-joint-counts.

Conclusions

Secukinumab demonstrates a potential benefit in facilitating partial erosion repair and preventing enthesiophyte progression in PsA.