World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Outcomes in Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661341724740973Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
    This article is part of the issue:

    Background:

    Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) remain elusive, especially for some specific cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease (CCVD). We aimed to quantify the magnitude of the risk of total and type-specific CCVD in AAV population.

    Method:

    Electronic database searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library plus a hand search of conference proceedings were performed. Observational studies reporting data on CCVD in AAV patients were eligible. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The primary outcome was the risk of CCVD, CAD and CVA in AAV population. The secondary outcomes were the risk of cause-specific CCVD, including myocardial infraction, angina pectoris, heart failure, stroke, ischemic stroke.

    Results:

    Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 20,096 AAV patients (over 46,495 person-years) with 5,757 CCVD events. Compared with non-vasculitis population, AAV patients showed an 83% increased risk of incident CCVD (1.83 [1.37-2.45]; n=10), 48% for coronary artery disease (1.48 [1.26-1.75]; n=9), and 56% for cerebrovascular accident (1.56 [1.22-1.99]; n=9). For type-specific CCVD, the risks of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure were increased by 67% (1.67 [1.29-2.15]; n=6), 97% (1.97 [1.19-3.25]; n=8) and 72% (1.72 [1.28-2.32]; n=4), whereas there was only a trend toward a higher risk of angina pectoris (1.46 [0.90-2.39]; n=2), and ischemic stroke (1.88 [0.86-4.12]; n=4). Subgroup analyses by AAV type found significantly increased CCVD risk in both granulomatosis with polyangiitis (1.87 [1.29-2.73]; n=7) and microscopic polyangiitis (2.93 [1.58-5.43]; n=3). In three studies reporting impact of follow-up period after AAV diagnosis, the CCVD risk was significantly higher in the first two years after diagnosis than the subsequent follow-up (2.23 [2.00-2.48] vs. 1.48 [1.40-1.56]; p < 0.01). Significant heterogeneity existed in the main analyses.

    Conclusions:

    This meta-analysis demonstrates that AAV is associated with increased risks of overall and type-specific CCVD, especially within two years after AAV diagnosis.