World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
POSTER PRESENTATION: ART, LaboratoryOpen Access

#273 : Comparative Analysis of Pregnancy Predictive Potential Using the Deep Learning Blastocyst Scoring Model Calculated from the Single Focus Blastocyst Image and Time-Lapse Image Sequences

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661318223744107Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
    This article is part of the issue:

    Background and Aims: Artificial Intelligence (AI) based embryo evaluation may objective and reduce inter-observer disagreement. Most commercially available AI models use blastocyst morphokinetics from time-lapse monitoring (TLM). Lifewhisperer (LW, FUJIFILM) is an AI-scoring model that uses a single-focus blastocyst image at a single-time point. LW may be more acceptable to many facilities than the TLM model as it does not require a time-lapse incubator. This study analyzed the predictive ability of LW for pregnant embryos and compared it to an AI model based on morphokinetics (iDAscore, Vitrolife) to assess their usefulness.

    Methods: This retrospective single-center study analyzed 666 vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles from January 2019 to December 2022. Inclusion criteria were blastocysts that developed within 5 days from insemination (maximum 120 h) using EmbryoScope+ (Vitrolife), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle, and a single-blastocyst transfer cycle. LW score (1.0–9.9) was calculated from single-focus blastocyst images taken before vitrification, while iDAScore (1.0–9.9) was calculated from time-lapse image sequences taken at 11 focal every 10 min after ICSI. We calculated the odds ratio for pregnancy and ROC analysis to compare these models.

    Results: The mean score was higher in pregnant blastocysts than in non-pregnant blastocysts in both models (LW: 7.47 vs. 6.72, p<0.01; iDAScore: 8.50 vs. 8.04, p<0.01, Willcoxon-test). The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for pregnancy was 1.19 (1.10–1.28) for LW and 1.48 (1.27–1.74) for iDAScore, with the odds for clinical pregnancy increasing with higher scores (p<0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC values were 0.60 for LW and 0.62 for iDAScore. There was no significant difference in the predictive ability for pregnant blastocysts (p=0.51).

    Conclusions: LW allowed objective score calculation from a single focus at single time point blastocyst images without TLM. Moreover, in day 5 blastocyst, LW and iDAscore had comparable predictive pregnancy ability.

    Publisher's Note:

    This article contains the abstract sections only.