Chapter 7: Damage Identification Based on Response Functions in Time and Frequency Domains
This chapter reviews and compares some of the most known methods of damage identification, in the frequency domain, which use operational deflection shapes (ODSs) built from the frequency response functions (FRFs). Two new methods of damage identification, in the time domain, using (ODSs) built from the time responses are also analyzed. To assess the performance of the different indicators, two numerical tests are undertaken with a finite element model (FEM) model, of a cantilever beam, to evaluate their detection and localizing ability.
- Damage identification
- Time response
- Frequency response
- Mode shape analysis
- Operational deflection shape (ODS)
- Modal assurance criterion (MAC)
- Coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC)
- Damage index (DI), Mode shape curvature (MSC)
- Sensitivity to damage analysis
- Strain energy damage index (SEDI)
- Procedure of maximum occurrences (MO)
- Resonant gapped-smoothing broadband method (RGSB)
- Frequency domain assurance criterion (FDAC)
- Transmissibility damage indicator (TDI)
- Error in the constitutive relations (ECR)
- Time domain Katz fractal dimension (TKFD) method