World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

IS ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOOD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT? SOME CONFLICTS AND CONFUSIONS

    https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848161030_0024Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)
    Abstract:

    This paper looks at the problem of defining and measuring energy efficiency, and the conflicts that arise from imprecise definitions. While energy efficiency is easy to define in a theoretical sense it is hard to measure due to problem in assessing energy (service) outputs. One solution is the development of indicators, like energy intensity, but simple indicators can give contradictory results. This is illustrated with three examples from the UK domestic sector. More complex indicators require extensive data collection and are difficult to track over time. Conflicts in the policy debate arise from confusion over the goal of energy efficiency: is it about saving money, saving energy or saving the world (by reducing CO2 emissions)? Particular conflict arise from electricity use, whose use is efficient in terms of delivered energy but inefficient in primary energy. A further source of debate, started by Len Brookes, arises over whether increased efficiency will indeed lead to reduced energy consumption. The paper attempts to define the issues and concludes by offering some policies which might satisfy the various parties in the debate and lead to reduced CO2 emissions.