World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814407977_0002Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
Abstract:

The Social Security System of the United States, a child of the Great Depression, dates its birth to 1935. It was controversial then and has remained so in varying degrees ever since. The requirement since 1983 to make 75-year projections of its financial prospects, where demographic changes in the age distribution of the population play a key role, have generated sobering, and in some quarters nearly hysterical, reactions about its sustainability. It is not my intent to review these issues in any detail. Many careful studies of the problems facing Social Security have concluded that they can be solved by relatively minor adjustments. An especially cogent analysis in this vein is provided by Peter Diamond and Peter Orzag in their book Saving Social Security — A Balanced Approach (2004). Their adjustments to revenues and benefits are based on three components: improvements in life expectancy, changes in earnings inequality, and what they call the legacy debt that arose from the early recipients’ relatively large benefits…