No Access

A Design Theory for Cognitive Workflow Systems

Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, M3S, University of Oulu, P. O. Box 8000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland

E-mail Address: jarkko.hyysalo@oulu.fi

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Markku Oivo

Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, M3S, University of Oulu, P. O. Box 8000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland

E-mail Address: markku.oivo@oulu.fi

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Pasi Kuvaja

Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, M3S, University of Oulu, P. O. Box 8000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland

E-mail Address: pasi.kuvaja@oulu.fi

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194017500061Cited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

This paper addresses the design problem of providing cognitive support for workflow systems in software development. Software development is demanding knowledge work that requires creativity and adaptability to changing requirements and situations. This type of work involves cognitive actions that require substantial support in several forms in order to address needs such as collaboration, communication, knowledge management, awareness and transparency, and the coordination and structuring of the development processes. The literature and our empirical results show that there is a lack of cognitive support in current workflow models. Hence, we identify the need for a design theory for cognitive workflow systems (CWS). In this paper, such a theory is presented. The proposed design theory for CWS is validated through an action research intervention. This design theory has important implications from both research and practical perspectives. The results will help developers in their daily work, enhance the efficiency of the development processes, and facilitate decision-making activities.

Keywords:

References

1. F. O. Bjørnson and T. Dingsøyr , Knowledge management in software engineering: A systematic review of studied concepts, findings and research methods used, Inf. Softw. Technol. 50 (11) (2008) 1055–1068. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. D. Panagiotou and G. Mentzas , Leveraging software reuse with knowledge management in software development, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 21 (5) (2011) 693–723. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. J. J. Sung , Representation-oriented software development: A cognitive approach to software engineering, in Proc. 17th Annual Psychology of Programming Interest Group Workshop, 2005, pp. 173–187. Google Scholar
4. D. Noble , Knowledge foundations of effective collaboration, in Proc. of 9th Int. Command and Control Research and Technology Symp., 2004. Google Scholar
5. P. Helo , Managing agility and productivity in the electronics industry, Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 104 (7) (2004) 567–577. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. R. G. Cooper, S. J. Edgett and E. J. Kleinschmidt , Benchmarking best NPD practices-III, Res. Technol. Manage. 47 (6) (2004) 43–55. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. A. Gupta, K. S. Pawara and P. Smart , New product development in the pharmaceutical and telecommunication industries: A comparative study, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 106 (1) (2007) 41–60. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. S. Buckingham Shum , Negotiating the construction of organizational memories, J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 3 (8) (1998) 899–928. Google Scholar
9. H. Zhuge , Workflow- and agent-based cognitive flow management for distributed team cooperation, Inf. Manage. 40 (2003) 419–429. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. M. Wang and H. Wang , From process logic to business logic: A cognitive approach to business process management, Inf. Manage. 43 (2) (2006) 179–193. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. J. G. Walls, G. R. Widmeyer and O. A. El Sawy , Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS, Inf. Syst. Res. 3 (1) (1992) 36–59. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. J. G. Walls, G. R. Widmeyer and O. A. El Sawy , Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition?, J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. (JITTA) 6 (2) (2004) 43–58. Google Scholar
13. J. Hyysalo, J. Lehto, S. Aaramaa and M. Kelanti , Supporting cognitive work in software development workflows, in Proc. of Profes 2013, 14th Int. Conf. Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 2013, pp. 20–34. Google Scholar
14. J. Birkinshaw, G. Hamel and M. J. Mol , Management innovation, Acad. Manage. Rev. 33 (4) (2008) 825–845. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. W. Tsai , Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing, Organ. Sci. 13 (2) (2002) 179–190. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. A. C. Inkpen , Creating knowledge through collaboration, Calif. Manage. Rev. 39 (1) (1996) 123–140. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. M. L. Markus, A. Majchrzak and L. Gasser , A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes, MIS Q. 26 (3) (2002) 179–212. Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. D. Draheim, V. Geist and C. Natschlaeger , Integrated framework for seamless modeling of business and technical aspects in process-oriented enterprise applications, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 22 (5) (2012) 645–674. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. H. van Leijen and W. R. J. Baets , A cognitive framework for reengineering knowledge-intensive processes, in 36th Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, 2003, pp. 97–106. Google Scholar
20. J. J. G. van Merriënboer , Training Complex Cognitive Skills (Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997). Google Scholar
21. K. Nakakoji, Y. Ye and Y. Yamamoto , Supporting expertise communication in developer-centered collaborative software development environments, in Collaborative Software Engineering (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 219–236. Crossref, Google Scholar
22. M. Klein and C. Dellarocas , A knowledge-based approach to handling exceptions in workflow systems, Comput. Support. Coop. Work 9 (2000) 399–412. Crossref, Google Scholar
23. N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M. J. Johnson, T. J. Norman, P. O’Brien and M. E. Wiegand , Agent-based business process management, Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 5 (2–3) (1996) 105–130. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. W. M. P. van der Aalst and T. Basten , Inheritance of workflows: An approach to tackling problems related to change, Theor. Comput. Sci. 270 (1–2) (2002) 125–203. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. M. Minor, R. Bergmann, S. Gorg and K. Walter , Reasoning on business processes to support change reuse, in Proc. of the 13th Conf. Commerce and Enterprise Computing, 2011, pp. 18–25. Google Scholar
26. G. M. Kasper , A theory of decision support system design for user calibration, Inf. Syst. Res. 7 (2) (1996) 215–232. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. M. Siponen, R. Baskerville and J. Heikka , A design theory for secure information systems design methods, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7 (1) (2006) 725–770. Google Scholar
28. O. Hanseth and K. Lyytinen , Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet, J. Inf. Technol. 25 (1) (2010) 1–19. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. E. W. Stein and V. Zwass , Actualizing organizational memory with information systems, Inf. Syst. Res. 6 (2) (1995) 85–117. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. S. Gregor and D. Jones , The anatomy of a design theory, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8 (5) (2007) 312–335. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. R. Baskerville and J. Pries-Heje , Explanatory design theory, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2 (5) (2010) 271–282. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. O. Hanseth and K. Lyytinen, Theorizing about the design of information infrastructures: Design kernel theories and principles, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 4(12) (2004) 4–12. Google Scholar
33. J. G. Walls, G. R. Widermeyer and O. A. El Sawy , Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition?, J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 6 (2) (2004) 43–58. Google Scholar
34. R. Baskerville and A. T. Wood-Harper , A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research, J. Inf. Technol. 11 (3) (1996) 235–246. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. G. Susman and R. Evered , An assessment of the scientific merits of action research, Adm. Sci. Q. 23 (4) (1978) 582–603. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. J. Hollan, E. Hutchins and D. Kirsch , Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research, ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. 7 (2) (2000) 174–196. Crossref, Google Scholar
37. O. Perrin and C. Godart , A model to support collaborative work in virtual enterprises, Data Knowl. Eng. 50 (1) (2004) 63–86. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. J. D. Herbsleb and D. Moitra , Global software development, IEEE Softw. 18 (2) (2001) 16–20. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. R. L. Daft, R. H. Lengel , Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design, Manage. Sci. 32 (5) (1986) 554–571. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. A. R. Dennis and J. S. Valacich , Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity, in Proc. of 32nd Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, IEEE 1999, pp. 1–10. Google Scholar
41. J. Short, E. Williams and B. Christie , Communication modes and task performance, Readings in Groupware and Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Morgan-Kaufmann, 1976), pp. 169–176. Google Scholar
42. M. Jiménez, M. Piattini and A. Vizcaíno , Challenges and improvements in distributed software development: A systematic review, Adv. Softw. Eng. 2009 (3) (2009) 1–14. Crossref, Google Scholar
43. J. A. Espinosa, S. A. Slaughter, R. E. Kraut and J. D. Herbsleb , Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development, J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24 (1) (2007) 135–169. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. I. Omoronyia, J. Ferguson, M. Roper and M. Wood , A review of awareness in distributed collaborative software engineering, Softw.-Pract. Exp. 40 (12) (2010) 1107–1133. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. A. Sarma, A survey of collaborative tools in software development, UCI ISR Technical Report, UCI-ISR-05-3 (Institute for Software Research, 2005), https://isr.uci.edu/tech_reports/UCI-ISR-05-3.pdf. Google Scholar
46. P. Dourish and V. Bellotti , Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces, in Proc. ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1992, pp. 107–114. Google Scholar
47. T. Robertson , Cooperative work and lived cognition: A taxonomy of embodied interaction, in Fifth European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW ’97), 1997, pp. 205–220. Google Scholar
48. M. Beaudouin-Lafon and A. Karsenty , Transparency and awareness in a real-time groupware system, in Proc. ACM Symp. on User Interface Software and Technology, 1992, pp. 171–181. Google Scholar
49. C. Gutwin, S. Greenberg and M. Roseman , Workspace awareness in real-time distributed groupware: Framework, widgets, and evaluation, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Human–Computer Interaction: People and Computers, 1996, pp. 281–298. Google Scholar
50. A. Jalote-Parmar, P. Badke-Schaub, W. Ali and E. Samset , Cognitive processes as integrative component for developing expert decision-making systems: A workflow centered framework, J. Biomed. Inform. 43 (1) (2010) 60–74. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. G. A. Hazelrigg , A framework for decision-based engineering design, J. Mech. Des. 120 (4) (1998) 653–658. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
52. R. G. Cooper , Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products, Bus. Horiz. 33 (3) (1990) 44–54. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53. S. Gregor , The nature of theory in information systems, MIS Q. 30 (3) (2006) 611–642. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
54. M. Adams, A. ter Hofstede, D. Edmond and W. van der Aalst , Worklets: A service-oriented implementation of dynamic flexibility in workflows, in Proc. CoopIS’06, 2006, pp. 291–308. Google Scholar