Relativistic Nuclear Astrophysics, Astroparticle Physics, Nuclear Matter, Nuclear Equation of State, Supernova, Neutron Stars and Pulsars, Quark and Strange StarsNo Access

NONRELATIVISTIC LIMITS OF THE NONLINEAR POINT-COUPLING MODELS AND THEIR NATURALNESS

A. DELFINO

Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Litorânea s/n, 24210-150 Boa Viagem, Niterói RJ, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author

O. LOURENÇO

Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Litorânea s/n, 24210-150 Boa Viagem, Niterói RJ, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author

M. DUTRA

Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Litorânea s/n, 24210-150 Boa Viagem, Niterói RJ, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author

, and

J. S. S. MARTINS

Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Litorânea s/n, 24210-150 Boa Viagem, Niterói RJ, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S021827181001738XCited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

We obtain the dimensionless coefficients of the single-particle energy density coming from the nonrelativistic limits of nonlinear relativistic hadronic point-coupling models for infinite nuclear matter at zero temperature, in order to analyze their naturalness, and compare them with some well known Skyrme parametrizations. The results show that the naturalness of these nonrelativistic models may be affected or not, depending on some parameters of the corresponding Skyrme models, such as σ and the incompressibility.

Keywords:

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 16, 1 (1986). Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. Boguta and A. R. Bodmer, Nucl. Phys. A 292, 414 (1977). Google Scholar
T. H. R. Skyrme, Philos. Mag. 1, 1043 (1959), DOI: 10.1080/14786435608238186. Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. Friedrich and P.-G. Reinhard, Phys. Rev. C 33, 335 (1986), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.33.335. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
E. Chabanatet al., Nucl. Phys. A 627, 710 (1997), DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00596-4. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
J. Rikovska Stoneet al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 034324 (2003), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034324. Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Brack, Helv. Phys. Acta 58, 715 (1985). Google Scholar
R. J. Furnstahl, J. Phys. G 31, S1357 (2005), DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/31/8/014. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
B. A. Nikolaus, T. Hoch and D. G. Madland, Phys. Rev. C 46, 1757 (1992), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.46.1757. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
O. Lourençoet al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 045206 (2009). Web of Science, Google Scholar
O. Lourençoet al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 16, 3037 (2007). Link, ADS, Google Scholar
P.-G. Reinhard, Rep. Prog. Phys. 52, 439 (1989), DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/52/4/002. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
J. Boguta and S. A. Moszkowski, Nucl. Phys. A 403, 445 (1983), DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(83)90616-4. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
M. Dutraet al., Phys. Rev. C 77, 035201 (2008), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.035201. Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. Sulaksonoet al., Ann. Phys. 308, 354 (2003). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
H. Georgi, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 209 (1993). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
R. J. Furnstahl and J. C. Hackworth, Phys. Rev. C 56, 2875 (1997), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.2875. Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. J. Lee and A. Z. Mekjian, Phys. Rev. C 63, 044605 (2001), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.63.044605. Web of Science, Google Scholar