Research PaperNo Access

Analytical Method to Estimate the Lateral Restraint for Unbraced Top Chords of Warren-Truss Bridges with Independent Cross-Beam Decks

Poznań University of Technology, ul. Piotrowo 5, 61-138 Poznań, Poland

E-mail Address: wojciech.siekierski@put.poznan.pl

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455422501899Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The assessment of the lateral buckling for the unbraced top chord of a truss bridge (a pony truss bridge) requires a finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of the whole structure or a method of the chord analysis based on the reliable estimation of the lateral restraint for the chord nodes. The latter alternative becomes crucial if rapid assessment is necessary. Majority of the existing analytical methods of assessment of the stability of top chords of pony truss bridges rely on the stiffness of $U$ -frames that consist of cross-beams and truss bracing members. The available analytical methods of setting the $U$ -frame stiffness seem to neglect the existence of independent cross-beam decks that, together with Warren-trusses, constitute contemporary truss bridges. Such structures are analyzed in the paper. The stiffness of the lateral restraint provided to the truss top chord by the cross-beams, the diagonals and the bottom chord are computed. The influence of the cross-beams is reflected, for the first time, as an equivalent torsional stiffness of the truss bottom chord. The analytical method is applied against the method included in the DIN design code to the pony Warren-truss bridges of various height-to-span ratios and various arrangements of their member cross-sections. Then the Timoshenko and Gere model of a compressed bar is adapted to find the critical load for the top chords of the aforementioned truss bridges. The results are compared to those obtained from the finite element method (FEM) analyses. It is concluded that the analytical method provides lower estimate for the critical load obtained from the FEM analysis provided the smallest values of cross-sectional properties, within the respective groups, are taken as representative for the computations.

Keywords:

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!
Remember to check out the structures

References

1. F. Engesser, Die sicherung offener brücken gegen ausknicken, Centralbl. Bauverwaltung 1884 (1885) 415 (in German). Google Scholar
2. F. Engesser, Die Zusatzkrafte und Nebenspannungen eisener Fachwerkbrucken, Vol. I, Die Zusatzkrafte, Vol. II, Die Nebenspannungen (Julius Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1892) (in German). Crossref, Google Scholar
3. T. Galambos, Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, 4th edn. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1998). Google Scholar
4. R. Ziemian, Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, 6th edn. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 2010). Crossref, Google Scholar
5. S. Timoshenko, Theory of Elastic Stability (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA, 1936). Google Scholar
6. S. Timoshenko and J. Gere, Theory of Elastic Stability, 2nd edn. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, London, 1989). Google Scholar
7. E. Holt, Buckling of a pony truss bridge. stability of bridge chords without lateral bracing. Report No. 2, Column Research Council (U.S.), Pennsylvania, Department of Highways, Bethlehem, PA, USA (1952). Google Scholar
8. S. L. Lee and R. W. Clough, Stability of pony truss bridges. Publ. Int. Assoc. Bridge Struct. Eng. 18 (1958) 91–112, https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-16509. Google Scholar
9. Q.-J. Wen and Z.-X. Yue, Elastic buckling property of the upper chords in aluminum half-through truss bridge, Structures 27 (2020) 1919–1929, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.057. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. W. Qingjie, Y. Zixiang and L. Zhijun, Nonlinear stability of the upper chords in half-through truss bridges, Steel Compos. Struct. 36(3) (2020) 307–319, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.3.307. Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. I. J. Balaz, Y. Kolekova and L. Moroczova, Stability analysis of compression member on elastic supports, Procedia Struct. Integr. 17 (2019) 734–741, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.098. Crossref, Google Scholar
12. D. Dowling and S. Walbridge, A comparative study of methods for analyzing aluminium pony truss structures, in 6th Int. Structural Specialty Conf., Fredericton, Canada, 13–16 June 2018, eds. K. Arjomandi and A. El Damatty. Google Scholar
13. DIN 18800 Part 2, Structural Steelwork, Analysis of safety against buckling of linear members and frames, Deutsches Institut Fur Normung e.V. (1990). Google Scholar
14. N. Dekker and W. Burdzik, A rational approach to obtaining effective lengths of compression members in framed structures, J. S. Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng. 47(3) (2005) 14–19. Google Scholar
15. M. Mashayekhi and E. Santini-Bell, Fatigue assessment of a complex welded steel bridge connection utilizing a three-dimensional multi-scale finite element model and hotspot stress method, Eng. Struc. 214 (2020) 110624. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. S. P. Tchemodanova, M. Mashayekhi, M. Sanayei and E. S. Bell, Multiaxial fatigue assessment of complex steel connections: A case study of a vertical-lift gussetless truss bridge, Eng. Struct. 235 (2021) 111996. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Dlubal RSTAB 9 (2021), https://www.dlubal.com/en/products/rstab-beam-structures/what-is-rstab. Google Scholar