No Access

Application of the FMECA Method for Optimizing the Reliability of the 1600T Press

Zine Ghemari

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-5352

Electrical Engineering Department, Mohamed Boudiaf University of M’sila, M’sila 28000, Algeria

E-mail Address: zine.ghemari@univ-msila.dz

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Salah Belkhiri

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9317-9131

Electrical Engineering Department, Mohamed Boudiaf University of M’sila, M’sila 28000, Algeria

Search for more papers by this author

Yahia Bezaf

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6982-1528

Electrical Engineering Department, Mohamed Boudiaf University of M’sila, M’sila 28000, Algeria

Search for more papers by this author

Ala Hamach

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9414-1614

Electrical Engineering Department, Mohamed Boudiaf University of M’sila, M’sila 28000, Algeria

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Salah Saad

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-4645

Electromechanical Systems Laboratory (LSELM), Badji Mokhtar University of Annaba, Annaba 23000, Algeria

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686724500288Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Reliability optimization is a process aimed at improving the effectiveness and efficiency of maintenance activities within an organization. This optimization can concern various aspects, including failure prevention, resource management, cost reduction, and improving the operational availability of equipment. In this work, our study aims to implement a comprehensive maintenance strategy for the 1600T press at Algal $+$ $+$ company with the primary objectives of preventing breakdowns, minimizing unplanned downtime, optimizing productivity, extending the lifespan of equipment, ensuring safety, and improving the competitiveness and profitability of the company. The problem of reliability and availability of the 1600T press at the Algal $+$ $+$ company can be addressed by a systematic approach to industrial maintenance. By adopting a holistic approach to industrial maintenance, Algal $+$ $+$ company can improve the reliability and availability of its equipment, thereby reducing unplanned downtime and optimizing overall productivity. By systematically applying FMECA to the 1600T press, the optimization efforts become data-driven and focused on addressing the most critical risks. This, in turn, significantly contributes to optimizing the reliability and availability of the equipment, reducing unplanned downtime, and enhancing overall operational efficiency.

Keywords:

References

1. Y. Chen, T. Jiang and Y. Liu , Maintenance optimization of multi-state systems with single maintenance capacity and arbitrarily distributed maintenance time, in 2020 Asia-Pacific Int. Symp. Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling (APARM) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1–5. Crossref, Google Scholar
2. C. Chuang, L. Ningyun, J. Bin and X. Yin , Condition-based maintenance optimization for continuously monitored degrading systems under imperfect maintenance actions, J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 31(4) (2020) 841–851. Crossref, Google Scholar
3. C. E. Dibsdale , Specifying predictive maintenance, in Aerospace Predictive Maintenance (SAE, 2020), pp. 93–97. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. A. Salmasnia et al., Integration of production planning, maintenance scheduling and noncentral chi-square chart parameters with random failures and multiple assignable causes, J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 21(1) (2022) 25–54. Link, Google Scholar
5. A. Syamsundar and V. N. A. Naikan , Assessment of maintenance effectiveness for repairable systems: PM and CM case studies, in 2020 Asia-Pacific Int. Symp. Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling (APARM) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1–5. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. H. Yan, H. Zuo, J. Tang, R. Wang and X. Ma , Predictive maintenance framework of the aircraft system based on PHM information, in 2020 Asia-Pacific Int. Symp. Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling (APARM) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1–6. Crossref, Google Scholar
7. S. Umeda, K. Tamaki, M. Sumiya and Y. Kamaji , Planned maintenance schedule update method for predictive maintenance of semiconductor plasma etcher, in 2020 Int. Symp. Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1–4. Crossref, Google Scholar
8. J. Li, H. Wang, L. Xiong, Y. He and C. Yi , Strategy optimization of multi-component system opportunity maintenance for electric multiple units from a lean maintenance perspective, IEEE Access 11 (2023) 89478–89487. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. M. Catelani, L. Ciani, D. Galar and G. Patrizi , Optimizing maintenance policies for a yaw system using reliability-centered maintenance and data-driven condition monitoring, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 69(9) (2020) 6241–6249. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. D. C. Chandola, P. Chandola, S. Verma and K. Jaiswal , An exploratory study to evaluate significance of maintenance planning in reducing aircraft maintenance turnaround time within airlines industry, in 2023 Int. Conf. Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE) (IEEE, 2023), pp. 402–407. Crossref, Google Scholar
11. L. Shi, Z. Su, Y. Zhang and Y. Zhu , Research on the optimization of a track circuit maintenance strategy based on the BB-MOPSO algorithm, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 32823–32834. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. G. Mottershead, S. Bomben, I. Kerszenbaum and G. Klempner , Maintenance philosophies, upgrades, and uprates, in Handbook of Large Hydro Generators: Operation and Maintenance (IEEE, 2021), pp. 595–632. Google Scholar
13. C. E. Dibsdale , A history of maintenance and how maintenance is done today, in Aerospace Predictive Maintenance (SAE, 2020), pp. 13–22. Crossref, Google Scholar
14. C. E. Dibsdale , What is predictive maintenance (PdM) and how does it fit into a maintenance regime? in Aerospace Predictive Maintenance (SAE, 2020), pp. 23–52. Crossref, Google Scholar
15. Y. H. Gaber et al., A model review on joint optimization of part quality inspection planning, buffer allocation, and preventive maintenance in SMMS, J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 22(3) (2023) 667–691. Link, Google Scholar
16. J. Huang, Q. Chang, J. Zou and J. Arinez , A real-time maintenance policy for multi-stage manufacturing systems considering imperfect maintenance effects, IEEE Access 6 (2018) 62174–62183. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. X. Su, Q. Gao, Q. Wu and J. Gao , Preventive maintenance task prediction based on hierarchical maintenance conversion law, in 2020 Prognostics and Health Management Conf. (PHM-Besançon) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 283–286. Crossref, Google Scholar
18. A. Bouti and D. A. Kadi , A state-of-the-art review of FMEA/FMECA, Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng. 1(4) (1994) 515–543. Link, Google Scholar
19. L. Cristaldi, E. Molena and E. Petkovski , An application of failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) method to the assessment of battery life cycle, in 2022 IEEE Int. Conf. Metrology for Extended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 34–39. Crossref, Google Scholar
20. L. Ya-Ping, W. Yi-Xiang and J. Peng , Application of FMECA in vehicle reliability analysis based on fuzzy evaluation method, in 2022 5th World Conf. Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing (WCMEIM) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 894–897. Crossref, Google Scholar
21. B. Chi, J. Hu, Y. Wang, T. Liu, S. Zhang and X. Chen , Research on the FMECA and random vibration test for micro inertial measurement unit, in 2022 Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management (PHM-Yantai) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 1–6. Crossref, Google Scholar
22. S. Lipirodjanapong, C. Suwanasri and T. Suwanasri , The reliability evaluation of configuration of bus arrangement in substations by the variable failure rate of power circuit breaker under time-based maintenance, in 2016 Int. Conf. Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (CMD) (IEEE, 2016), pp. 705–708. Crossref, Google Scholar
23. S. Pansrisu and S. Premrudeepreechacharn , Preventive maintenance optimization for excitation system of bhumibol hydro power plant, in Proc. Int. Conf. Energy and Sustainable Development: Issues and Strategies (ESD 2010) (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1–6. Crossref, Google Scholar
24. H. Sun, J. J. Han and H. Levendel , Availability requirement for a fault-management server in high-availability communication systems, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 52(2) (2003) 238–244. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. M. Jemelka, B. Chramcov, P. Kříž and T. Bata , ABC analyses with recursive method for warehouse, in 2017 4th Int. Conf. Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 960–963. Crossref, Google Scholar
26. E. Iadanza, M. Zacchia, D. Pennati, L. Manetti, L. Bocchi and M. Gherardelli , Fuzzy FMECA process analysis for managing the risks in the lifecycle of a CBCT scanner, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 135723–135741. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. R. C. DeLuca, T. Schwartz-Watjen and W. Tomczykowski , Challenges of and lessons learned from implementing an MBE FMECA in the DoD, in 2022 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symp. (RAMS) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 1–6. Crossref, Google Scholar
28. M. Catelani, L. Ciani, D. Galar, G. Guidi, S. Matucci and G. Patrizi , FMECA assessment for railway safety-critical systems investigating a new risk threshold method, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 86243–86253. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. Z. Ghemari, S. Saad and K. Khettab , Improvement of the vibratory diagnostic method by evolution of the piezoelectric sensor performances, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 20(8) (2019) 1361–1369. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. S.-K. Reguieg, Z. Ghemari, T. Benslimane and S. Saad , Modeling and enhancement of piezoelectric accelerometer relative sensitivity, Sens. Imaging 20(1) (2019) 1–14. Crossref, Google Scholar
31. Z. Ghemari and S. Saad , Piezoresistive accelerometer mathematical model development with experimental validation, IEEE Sens. J. 18(7) (2018) 2690–2696. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. Z. Ghemari, S. Salah and R. Bourenane , Resonance effect decrease and accuracy increase of piezoelectric accelerometer measurement by appropriate choice of frequency range, Shock Vib. 2018 (2018) 5370438. Google Scholar
33. Z. Ghemari , Progression of the vibratory analysis technique by improving the piezoelectric sensor measurement accuracy, Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 60(12) (2018) 2972–2977. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. Z. Ghemari , Study and analysis of the piezoresistive accelerometer stability and improvement of their performances, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage. 8 (2017) 1520–1526. Crossref, Google Scholar
35. Z. Ghemari and S. Belkhiri , Mechanical resonator sensor characteristics development for precise vibratory analysis, Sens. Imaging 22(1) (2021) 40. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. S. Belkhiri, Z. Ghemari, S. Saad and G. Boudechiche , Improvement of the vibratory analysis by enhancement of accelerometer characteristics, Sens. Lett. 18(1) (2020) 39–42. Crossref, Google Scholar
37. Z. Ghemari and S. Saad , Development of measurement precision of sensor vibration, J. Vib. Control 19(10) (2013) 1480–1486. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. R. S. Khaoula, Z. Ghemari and T. Benslimane , Extraction of the relative sensitivity model and improvement of the piezoelectric accelerometer performances, in 2018 Int. Conf. Signal, Image, Vision and their Applications (SIVA) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 1–5. Google Scholar
39. M. Defdaf and Z. Ghemari , Improvement of method queues by progress of the piezoresistive accelerometer parameters, J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 16(3) (2017) 227–235. Link, Google Scholar
40. Z. Ghemari and S. Saad , Development of model and enhancement of measurement precision of sensor vibration, IEEE Sens. J. 12(12) (2012) 3454–3459. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. Z. Ghemari , Improvement of the piezoelectric sensor by the progress of the measurement accuracy, in IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Materials and Spectroscopy (SMS’2018) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 349–357. Google Scholar
42. Z. Ghemari and S. Saad , The use of mechanical sensitivity model to enhance capacitive sensor characteristics, Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 99 (2019) 349–357. Crossref, Google Scholar
43. Z. Ghemari and S. Saad , Enhancement of capacitive accelerometer operation by parameters improvement, Int. J. Numer. Model., Electron. Netw. Devices Fields 32(22) (2019) e2568. Crossref, Google Scholar
44. Z. Ghemari et al., Appropriate choice of damping rate and frequency margin for improvement of the piezoelectric sensor measurement accuracy, J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 20(3) (2021) 537–548. Link, Google Scholar
45. L. Aissaoui and Z. Ghemari , Mathematical modeling and simulation of the piezoelectric accelerometer, in 3rd Int. Conf. Applied Engineering and Natural Sciences (2022). Google Scholar
46. Z. Ghemari , The accelerometer characteristics improvement, in 7th Int. Conf. Control Engineering & Information Technology (2019). Google Scholar
47. M. R. Morakchi, Z. Ghemari, M. Defdaf, A. Guezi, D. Selman and K. Merwane, MEMS accelerometer and gyroscope in navigation technology, in 3rd Int. Conf. Applied Engineering and Natural Sciences. Google Scholar
48. M. R. Morakchi and Z. Ghemari , The best choice of the capacitive accelerometer damping rate for reduction of the measurement error, in 1st Conf. Int. Electrotechnique et Technologies Modernes CIETM’22 (2022). Google Scholar
49. R. Morakchi, Z. Ghemari and M. Defdaf , The optimal accelerometer parameter integrated into the mathematical model for avoiding detection errors, in 1st Int. Conf. Engineering and Applied Natural Sciences (2022). Google Scholar