Research PaperFree Access

Controlled quantum teleportation with the ability to change the destination of qubits

Mahdi Sadeghizadeh

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5253-6275

Department of Computer Engineering, Quchan University of Technology, Quchan, Iran

Search for more papers by this author

Monireh Houshmand

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-1532

Department of Electrical Engineering, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran

E-mail Address: m_houshmand61@yahoo.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Mahsa Khorrampanah

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1499-0776

Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Search for more papers by this author

Hossein Aghababa

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-3798

Department of Engineering, Loyola University Maryland, Founder of Quantum Computation and Communication Laboratory, University of Tehran, Iran

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Yousef Mafi

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-4115

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749923500405Cited by:5 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Quantum sciences and technologies introduce a new arena whose applications are widely used in the microscopic world. Quantum communication is also an important branch of quantum science by which we intend to transmit quantum information. Quantum teleportation is important because it uses the entanglement principle which is unique in quantum space to transmit quantum information. In fact, in this type of protocol, no information is sent and everything is transmitted using the miracle of entanglement. In this paper, an attempt is made to present a quantum teleportation scheme that, unlike the other designs, can change the destination of qubits. This means that at the beginning of the protocol, the receivers have no idea who has sent the qubits, and the controller decides how these communications will work. At last, noise analysis is presented.

Keywords:

References

1. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Courier Corporation, 1951). Google Scholar
2. A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Springer Science & Business Media, 1993). Google Scholar
3. B. Robert Griffiths, Consistent Quantum Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2003). Google Scholar
4. G. E. Moore, Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, Electron. Mag. 38 (1965). Google Scholar
5. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002). Google Scholar
6. T. P. Spiller, W. Munro, S. Barrett and P. Kok, Contemp. Phys. 46 (2005) 407–436. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. S. Wiesner, Conjugate coding manuscript, written crica 1970, Unpublished until it appeared in sigact News, vol. 15, pp. 78–88, 1983. Google Scholar
8. M. Khorrampanah and M. Houshmand, An efficient quantum secret sharing using secure direct communication, 2013 21st Iranian Conf. Electrical Engineering (ICEE) (IEEE 2013), pp. 1–5. Crossref, Google Scholar
9. M. S. Sadeghi-Zadeh, M. Khorrampanah, M. Houshmand, H. Aghababa and Y. Mafi, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2 (2021) 1–6. Google Scholar
10. C. H. Bennet, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1895. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 910–913. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. I. Brown et al., J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 38(5) (2005) 1119. Crossref, Google Scholar
13. B. S. Shi and A. Tomita, Phys. Lett. A 296 (2002) 324–326. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. G. Rigolin, Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 032303. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. P. Agrawal and A. Pati, Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 062320. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. S. Muralidharan and P. K. Panigrahi, Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 032321. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. W. B. Cardoso, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 47 (2008) 977. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. D. Tian, Y. Tao and M. Qin, Sci. China G Phys. Mech. Astron. 51 (2008) 1523. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. K. Yang, L. Huang, W. Yang and F. Song, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48 (2009) 516. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. S. Q. Tang, C. J. Shan and X. X. Zhang, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 49 (2010) 1899. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. C. W. Tsai and T. Hwang, Int. J. Theor. Phys, 49 (2010) 1969–1975. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. Y. Y. Nie, Y. H. Li, J. C. Liu and M. H. Sang, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50 (2011) 3225–3229. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. K. Nandi and C. Mazumdar, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 (2014) 1322–1324. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. A. Karlsson and M. Bourennane, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 4394. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. C. P. Yang and S. Y. Han, Phys. Lett. A 343 (2005) 267. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. F. F. Deng, C. Y. Li, Y. S. Li, H. Y. Zhou and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 022338. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. Y. H. Wang and H. S. Song, Opt. Commun. 281 (2008) 489. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. S. Li, Y. Nie, Z. H. Hong, X. J. Yi and Y. B. Huang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 50 (2008) 633–636. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. X. W. Wang, Y. H. Su and G. J. Yang, Quantum Inf. Proc. 8 (2009) 319. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. T. Y. Wang and Q. Y. Wen, Chin. Phys. B 20 (2011) 5. Google Scholar
31. X. W. Zha, H. Y. Song and G. L. Ma, “Bidirectional swapping quantum controlled teleportation based on maximally entangled five-qubit state” arXiv:1006.0052 [quant-ph], 2010. Google Scholar
32. A. Yan, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 3870–3873. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. X. M. Sun and X. W. Zha, Acta Photon. Sin. 48 (2013) 1052–1056. Google Scholar
34. X. W. Zha, Z. C. Zou, J. X. Qi and H. Y. Song, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 1740–1744. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. Y. H. Li and L. P. Nie, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 1630–1634. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. C. Shukla, A. Banerjee and A. Pathak, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52(10) (2013) 3790–3796. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. Y. H. Li, X. I. Li, M. H. Sang, Y. Y. Nie and Z. Sh. Wang, Quantum Inf. Processing 12(12) (2013) 3835–3844. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. Y. J. Duan and X. W. Zha, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 (2014) 440–446. Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. Y. J. Duan, X. W. Zha, X. M. Sun and J. F. Xia, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 (2014) 2697–2707. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. Y. Chen, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 (2014) 1454–1458. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. Y. Chen, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54(1) (2015) 269–272. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. D. Zhang, X. W. Zha, W. Li and Y. Yu, Quantum Inf. Processing 14(10) (2015) 3835–3844. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. Sh. Hassanpour and M. Houshmand, 23th Iranian Conf. Electrical Engineering (ICEE) (2015). Google Scholar
44. J. W. Wang and L. Shu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B Condens. Matter Phys. Stat. Phys. Atomic Mol. Opt. Phys. 29(18) (2015) 155–162. Google Scholar
45. M. H. Sang, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55(1) (2016) 380–383. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
46. W. Q. Hong, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55(1) (2016) 384–387. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
47. Y. H. Li, L. P. Nie, X. L. Li and M. H. Sang, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55(6) (2016) 3008–3016. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
48. S. H. Hassanpour and M. Houshmand, Quantum Inf. Processing 15(2) (2016) 905–912. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
49. Y. H. Li and X. M. Jin, Quantum Inf. Processing 15(2) (2016) 929–945. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
50. M. S. S. Zadeh, M. Houshmand and H. Aghababa, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56(7) (2017) 2101–2112. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. M. S. S. Zadeh, M. Houshmand and H. Aghababa, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57(1) (2018) 175–183. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
52. A. Banerjee, C. Shukla, K. Thapliyal, A. Pathak and P. K. Panigrahi. Quantum Inf. Processing 16(2) (2017) 49. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53. N. Vyas, D. Saha and P. K. Panigrahi. Quantum Inf. Processing 15(9) (2016) 3855–3867. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
54. Oh, Sangchul, S. Lee and H.-w. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 66(2) (2002) 022316. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
55. G. Lindblad, Commun. Math. Phys. 48(2) (1976) 119–130. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
56. D. A. Lidar, I. L. Chuang and K. Birgitta Whaley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(12) (1998) 2594. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
57. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press on Demand, 2002). Google Scholar
58. M. S. Sadeghi-Zadeh, M. Houshmand, H. Aghababa, M. H. Kochakzadeh and F. Zarmehi, Quantum Inf. Processing 18(11) (2019) 353. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
59. S. Quek, Z. Li and Y. Yeo, Phys. Rev. A 81(2) (2010) 024302. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
60. T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(14) (2006) 140403. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar