Special Issue on Management of Information in Technology Driven TeamsNo Access

EVALUATING PROJECT ROBUSTNESS THROUGH THE LENS OF THE BUSINESS MODEL

JUSTIN M. REGINATO

Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Management, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Ave., Stockton, CA 95211, USA

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877009001613Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The success of large-scale innovative projects is increasingly a function of the marriage of multiple complex technologies and the ability to articulate and capture economic benefits. For corporations, the decision to pursue particular projects often hinges on the creation of, or the ability to appropriate, requisite technologies in a manner that will allow for an adequate return on investment for project shareholders. The business model is a tool that can be used to help determine whether or not a project has the necessary components for successful completion. A business model articulates a business venture's value proposition, market segment, cost and profit structure, value chain, value network, and competitive strategy. While business models are commonly used at the corporate level, they can also be applied to projects in order to convey how the potential of multiple converging technological inputs lead to the creation of sustainable economic value outputs, often in the face of technical and market uncertainty. Empirical observations from the biopharmaceutical and aerospace industries reveal that projects with incomplete business models face considerable complications, while projects with complete business models face less difficulty with respect to execution. As such, companies can use business models as a tool for making project go/no go decisions whereby only projects with complete business models are allowed to progress through the development process.

Keywords:

References

A. Afuah and C. Tucci , Internet Business Models and Strategies ( Basic Books , New York, NY , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
H. Chesbrough , Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology ( Harvard Business School Publishing , Boston, MA , 2003 ) . Google Scholar
H. Chesbrough and R. Rosenbloom, Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3), 529 (2002). Crossref, Google Scholar
H. Chesbrough and D. J. Teece, Harvard Business Review 65 (1996). Google Scholar
C. Christensen and R. Rosenbloom, Research Policy 24, 233 (1995). Crossref, Google Scholar
R. G. Cooper , Winning at New Products ( Cambridge, MA , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
J. Dedrick and K. L. Kraemer, California Management Review 47(3), 122 (2005). Crossref, Google Scholar
J. A. DiMasi, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 69, 297 (2001). Crossref, Google Scholar
R. Dorf and T. Byers , Technology Ventures: From Idea to Enterprise ( McGraw Hill, New York, NY , 2006 ) . Google Scholar
J. Emerson, California Business Review 45(4), 35 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
C. Fineet al., MIT Sloan Management Review 43(2), 69 (2002). Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2004). Innovation stagnation: Challenge and opportunity on the critical path to new medical products. FDA White Paper, March . Google Scholar
A. Frohman, California Business Review 27(2), 48 (1985). Crossref, Google Scholar
G. Hamel , Leading the Revolution ( Harvard Business School Press , Cambridge, MA , 2000 ) . Google Scholar
A. Hughes and M. S. S. Morton, MIT Sloan Management Review 47(4), 50 (2006). Google Scholar
J. Magretta, Harvard Business Review 3 (2002). Google Scholar
B. Mahadevan, California Management Review 42(4), 55 (2000). Crossref, Google Scholar
C. Markides and P. Geroski, Strategy and Business 35, 51 (2004). Google Scholar
A. Ordanini, California Management Review 47(2), 97 (2005). Crossref, Google Scholar
M. Porter , Competitive Strategy ( Free Press , New York, NY , 1980 ) . Google Scholar
R. S. Rosenbloom and W. J. Spencer , Engines of Innovation: Industrial Research at the End of an Era ( Harvard Business School Press , Boston, MA , 1996 ) . Google Scholar
R. P. Rumelt , Competitive Strategic Management , ed. R. Lamb ( Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , 1984 ) . Google Scholar
C. Shapiro, RAND Journal of Economics 20(1), 125 (1989). Crossref, Google Scholar
D. J. Teece, Research Policy 15, 285 (1986). Crossref, Google Scholar
D. J. Teece, G. Pisano and A. Shuen, Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509 (1997). Crossref, Google Scholar
A. Tsalgatidou and E. Pitoura, Computer Networks 37(2), 221 (2001). Crossref, Google Scholar
B. Wernerfelt, Strategic Management Journal 5, 171 (1984). Crossref, Google Scholar
M. Zeng and W. Reinartz, California Management Review 45(2), 107 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar