Research ArticleNo Access

Barrow holographic phantom

Department of Mathematics, Institute of Applied Sciences and Humanities, GLA University, Mathura 281406, Uttar Pradesh, India

E-mail Address: sharma.umesh@gla.ac.in

Search for more papers by this author

and

Mukesh Kumar

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4477-1582

Department of Mathematics, Institute of Applied Sciences and Humanities, GLA University, Mathura 281406, Uttar Pradesh, India

E-mail Address: mukesh.kumar@gla.ac.in

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887822500669Cited by:13 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

In the present work, we consider the recently proposed non-interacting Barrow holographic dark energy (Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.18(01) (2021) 2150014, doi:10.1142/S0219887821500146) with Hubble horizon as IR cutoff in a flat FLRW universe. We examine the evolutionary behavior of deceleration parameter and equation of state parameter for the different Barrow exponent $Δ$ , and observe suitable behavior in the model. We choose $Δ > 2$ in the non-interacting Barrow holographic dark energy which is explained by a phantom scalar field, then we exhibit the phantomic narration of the Barrow holographic dark energy with $Δ > 2$ and reconstruct the potential of the phantom scalar field.

Keywords:

PACS: 98.80.Es, 95.36.+x, 98.80.Ck

References

1. Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration (S. Perlmutter et al.), Measurements of $Ω$ and $Λ$ from 42 high redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565–586. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. Supernova Search Team (A. G. Riess et al.), Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009–1038. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov , Dark energy cosmology: The equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests, Astrophys. Space Sci. 342 (2012) 155–228. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa , Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753–1936. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. T. Padmanabhan , Cosmological constant the weight of the vacuum, Phys. Rep. 380 (2003) 235–320. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra , The cosmological constant and dark energy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559–606. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. S. M. Carroll , The cosmological constant, Living Rev. Relativ. 4 (2001) 1. Crossref, Google Scholar
8. M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami and A. A. Sen , Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion and dark energy matter unification, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 043507. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. A. Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier , An Alternative to quintessence, Phys. Lett. B 511 (2001) 265–268. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. Supernova Cosmology Project (N. Suzuki et al.), The Hubble Space Telescope Cluster Supernova Survey: V. Improving the Dark Energy Constraints Above $z > 1$ and Building an Early-Type-Hosted Supernova Sample, Astrophys. J. 746 (2012) 85. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. Planck (N. Aghanim et al.), Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A1. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. SDSS-III Collaboration (S. Alam et al.), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 219 (2015) 12. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. BOSS (K. S. Dawson et al.), The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III, Astron. J. 145 (2013) 10. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. E. D. Valentino, A. Mukherjee and A. A. Sen , Dark Energy with Phantom Crossing and the $H_{0}$ tension, Entropy 23 (2021) 404. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. A. Vikman , Can dark energy evolve to the phantom? Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 023515. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov , The oscillating dark energy: Future singularity and coincidence problem, Phys. Lett. B 637(3) (2006) 139. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. K. Bamba, C. Q. Geng, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov , Crossing of the phantom divide in modified gravity, Phys. Lett. B 79 (2009) 083014. Google Scholar
18. E. N. Saridakis , Phantom crossing and quintessence limit in extended nonlinear massive gravity, Class. Quantum Grav. 30 (2013) 075003. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov , Inhomogeneous equation of state of the universe: Phantom era, future singularity, and crossing the phantom barrier, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 023003. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. H. Wei and R. G. Cai , A note on crossing the phantom divide in hybrid dark energy model, Phys. Lett. B 634 (2006) 9–13. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. L. P. Chimento, M. I. Forte, R. Lazkoz and M. G. Richarte , Internal space structure generalization of the quintom cosmological scenario, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 043502. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. W. Hu , Crossing the phantom divide: Dark energy internal degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 047301. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. J. Matsumoto , Phantom crossing dark energy in Horndeskis theory, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123538. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. C. Deffayet, O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman , Imperfect dark energy from kinetic gravity braiding, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2010) 026. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. W. Fang, W. Hu and A. Lewis , Crossing the phantom divide with parameterized post-Friedmann dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 087303. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos , Crossing the phantom divide: Theoretical implications and observational status, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2007) 018. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. Y. Wang, L. Pogosian, G. B. Zhao and A. Zucca , Evolution of dark energy reconstructed from the latest observations, Astrophys. J. Lett. 869 (2018) L8. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. D. L. Shafer and D. Huterer , Chasing the phantom: A closer look at Type Ia supernovae and the dark energy equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 063510. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. G. B. Zhao et al., Dynamical dark energy in light of the latest observations, Nat. Astron. 1(9) (2017) 627–632. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. S. Capozziello and A. A. Sen , Model-independent constraints on dark energy evolution from low-redshift observations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484 (2019) 4484–4494. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. K. Dutta, A. Roy, A. A. Sen and M. Sheikh-Jabbari , Beyond $Λ$ CDM with low and high redshift data: Implications for dark energy, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52 (2020) 1–16. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. S. Wang, Y. Wang and M. Li , Holographic dark energy, Phys. Rep. 696 (2017) 1–57. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. M. Li , A Model of holographic dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 603 (2004) 1. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. L. Susskind , The World as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377–6396. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. R. Bousso , The holographic principle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 825–874. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson , Effective field theory, black holes, and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4971–497. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. D. Pavon and W. Zimdahl , Holographic dark energy and cosmic coincidence, Phys. Lett. B 628 (2005) 206–210. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. M. R. Setare and E. N. Saridakis , Non-minimally coupled canonical, phantom and quintom models of holographic dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 331–338. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov , Unifying phantom inflation with late-time acceleration: Scalar phantom-non-phantom transition model and generalized holographic dark energy, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38 (2006) 1285–1304. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. E. N. Saridakis , Ricci-Gauss-Bonnet holographic dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 97(6) (2018) 064035. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. M. Jamil, E. N. Saridakis and M. R. Setare , Holographic dark energy with varying gravitational constant, Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 172–176. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. M. Bouhmadi-Lopez, A. Errahmani and T. Ouali , The cosmology of an holographic induced gravity model with curvature effects, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 083508. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and E. N. Saridakis , Holographic inflation, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134829. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. B. Pourhassan, A. Bonilla, M. Faizal and E. M. C. Abreu , Holographic dark energy from fluid/gravity duality constraint by cosmological observations, Phys. Dark Universe 20 (2018) 41–48. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov , Covariant generalized holographic dark energy and accelerating universe, Eur. Phys. J. C 77(8) (2017) 528. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
46. J. Lu, E. N. Saridakis, M. R. Setare and L. Xu , Observational constraints on holographic dark energy with varying gravitational constant, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2010) 031. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
47. X. Zhang and F. Q. Wu , Constraints on holographic dark energy from Type Ia supernova observations, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043524. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
48. M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and X. Zhang , Holographic dark energy models: A comparison from the latest observational data, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2009) 036. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
49. E. N. Saridakis, K. Bamba, R. Myrzakulov and F. K. Anagnostopoulos , Holographic dark energy through Tsallis entropy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2018) 012. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
50. M. Tavayef, A. Sheykhi, K. Bamba and H. Moradpour , Tsallis holographic dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018) 195. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. A. S. Jahromi, S. A. Moosavi, H. Moradpour, J. P. Morais Graa, I. P. Lobo, I. G. Salako and A. Jawad , Generalized entropy formalism and a new holographic dark energy model, Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 21. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
52. H. Moradpour, S. A. Moosavi, I. P. Lobo, J. P. M. Graça, A. Jawad and I. G. Salako , Thermodynamic approach to holographic dark energy and the Rényi entropy, Eur. Phys. J. C 78(10) (2018) 829. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53. H. Moradpour, A. H. Ziaie and M. Kord Zangeneh , Generalized entropies and corresponding holographic dark energy models, Eur. Phys. J. C 80(8) (2020) 732. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
54. N. M. Ali, Pankaj, U. K. Sharma, S. K. Pathamuthu and S. Srivastava, New Tsallis holographic dark energy with apparent horizon as IR-cutoff in non-flat Universe, preprint (2021), arXiv:2110.07021 [physics.gen-ph]. Google Scholar
55. U. K. Sharma, V. C. Dubey, A. H. Ziaie and H. Moradpour, Kaniadakis holographic dark energy in non-flat Universe, preprint (2021), arXiv:2106.08139 [physics.gen-ph]. Google Scholar
56. B. D. Pandey, S. K. Pathamuthu, Pankaj and U. K. Sharma, New Tsallis holographic dark energy, preprint (2021), arXiv:2110.13628 [physics.gen-ph]. Google Scholar
57. U. K. Sharma and V. Srivastava , Reconstructing Tsallis holographic quintessence, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36(31) (2021) 2150221. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
58. E. N. Saridakis , Barrow holographic dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 102(12) (2020) 123525. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
59. S. Srivastava and U. K. Sharma , Barrow holographic dark energy with Hubble horizon as IR cutoff, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 18(01) (2021) 2150014. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
60. J. D. Barrow , The area of a rough black hole, Phys. Lett. B 808 (2020) 135643. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
61. E. N. Saridakis , Modified cosmology through spacetime thermodynamics and Barrow horizon entropy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020 (2020) 031. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
62. E. N. Saridakis and S. Basilakos, The generalized second law of thermodynamics with Barrow entropy, preprint (2020), arXiv:2005.08258 [gr-qc]. Google Scholar
63. A. A. Mamon, A. Paliathanasis and S. Saha , Dynamics of an interacting Barrow holographic dark energy model and its thermodynamic implications, Eur. Phys. J. C 136 (2021) 1–14. Web of Science, Google Scholar
64. F. K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Basilakos and E. N. Saridakis , Observational constraints on Barrow holographic dark energy, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 826. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
65. E. M. C. Abreu and J. A. Neto , Barrow black hole corrected-entropy model and Tsallis nonextensivity, Phys. Lett. B 810 (2020) 135805. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
66. M. P. Dabrowski and V. Salzano , Geometrical observational bounds on a fractal horizon holographic dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 064047. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
67. J. D. Barrow, S. Basilakos and E. N. Saridakis , Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on Barrow entropy, Phys. Lett. B 815 (2021) 136134. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
68. U. K. Sharma, G. Varshney and V. C. Dubey , Barrow agegraphic dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30(03) (2021) 2150021. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
69. E. M. C. Abreu and J. A. Neto , Barrow fractal entropy and the black hole quasinormal modes, Phys. Lett. B 807 (2020) 135602. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
70. E. M. C. Abreu and J. A. Neto , Thermal features of Barrow corrected-entropy black hole formulation, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 776. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
71. A. Sheykhi , Barrow entropy corrections to Friedmann equations, Phys. Rev. D 103(12) (2021) 123503. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
72. G. Chakraborty, S. Chattopadhyay, E. Güdekli and I. Radinschi , Thermodynamics of Barrow holographic dark energy with specific cut-off, Symmetry 13 (2021) 562. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
73. A. Pradhan, A. Dixit and V. K. Bhardwaj , Barrow HDE model for Statefinder diagnostic in FLRW Universe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36(04) (2021) 2150030. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
74. Q. Huang, H. Huang, B. Xu, F. Tu and J. Chen , Dynamical analysis and statefinder of Barrow holographic dark energy, Eur. Phys. J. C 81(8) (2021) 686. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
75. S. Rani and N. Azhar , Braneworld inspires cosmological implications of Barrow holographic dark energy, Universe 7(8) (2021) 268. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
76. P. Adhikary, S. Das, S. Basilakos and E. N. Saridakis , Barrow holographic dark energy in a nonflat universe, Phys. Rev. D 104(12) (2021) 123519. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
77. M. Asghari and A. Sheykhi, Observational constraints of the modified cosmology through Barrow entropy, preprint (2021), arXiv:2110.00059 [gr-qc]. Google Scholar
78. M. R. Setare , Interacting holographic phantom, Eur. Phys. J. C 50 (2007) 991–998. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
79. S. Carlip , Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula, Class. Quantum Grav. 17 (2000) 4175–4186. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
80. R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar , Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5255–5257. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
81. G. Wilk and Z. Wlodarczyk , On the interpretation of nonextensive parameter q in Tsallis statistics and Levy distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2770. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
82. C. Tsallis and L. J. L. Cirto , Black hole thermodynamical entropy, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2487. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
83. C. Tsallis , Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics, J. Stat. Phys. 52 (1988) 479–487. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
84. A. Aviles, A. Bravetti, S. Capozziello and O. Luongo , Precision cosmology with Padé rational approximations: Theoretical predictions versus observational limits, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 043531. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
85. S. Capozziello, R. D’Agostino and O. Luongo , High-redshift cosmography: Auxiliary variables versus Padé polynomials, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 494 (2020) 2576–2590. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
86. S. Capozziello, R. D’Agostino and O. Luongo , Cosmographic analysis with Chebyshev polynomials, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476 (2018) 3924–3938. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
87. F. Hoyle A new model for the expanding universe, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 108 (1948) 372–382. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
88. F. Hoyle and J. V. Narlikar , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 155 (1972) 305. Crossref, Google Scholar
89. R. R. Caldwell , Phantom Menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state, Phys. Lett. B 545 (2002) 23. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
90. A. Bouali, I. Albarran, M. Bouhmadi-Lpez and T. Ouali , Cosmological constraints of phantom dark energy models, Phys. Dark Universe 26 (2019) 100391. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
91. S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. Odintsov , Unified phantom cosmology: Inflation, dark energy and dark matter under the same standard, Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 597. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
92. N. Roy and N. Bhadra , Dynamical systems analysis of phantom dark energy models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2018) 002. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
93. X. Zhang , Dynamical vacuum energy, holographic quintom, and the reconstruction of scalar-field dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 103505. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
94. M. J. Zhang and H. Li , Observational constraint on the dark energy scalar field, Chin. Phys. C 45(4) (2021) 045103. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
95. E. N. Saridakis , Phantom evolution in power-law potentials, Nucl. Phys. B 819 (2009) 116–126. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
96. R. R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski and N. N. Weinberg , Phantom energy and cosmic doomsday, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 071301. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
97. P. Singh, M. Sami and N. Dadhich , Cosmological dynamics of phantom field, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 023522. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar