Research ArticleNo Access

Cosmographic studies of $q = α - \frac{β}{H}$ parametrization in $f (T)$ framework

Bhupendra Kumar Shukla

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4318-2356

Department of Mathematics, Government College Bandri, Sagar 470442, Madhya Pradesh, India

E-mail Address: bhupendrashukla695@gmail.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Amine Bouali

Laboratory of Physics of Matter and Radiation, Mohammed I University, BP 717, Oujda, Morocco

E-mail Address: a1.bouali@ump.ac.ma

Search for more papers by this author

Himanshu Chaudhary

Department of Applied Mathematics, Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110042, India

E-mail Address: himanshuch1729@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author

Rishi Kumar Tiwari

Department of Mathematics, Government Model Science College Rewa 7820436, Madhya Pradesh, India

E-mail Address: rishitiwari59@rediffmail.com

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Marco San Martín

Faculty of Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaiso, Santiago 7820436, Chile

E-mail Address: mlsanmartin@uc.cl

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887824500075Cited by:10 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

In this paper, we further investigate the cosmological tests of the deceleration parameter $q = α - \frac{β}{H}$ with $f (T) = κ + λ T$ , where $κ$ and $λ$ are free parameters in $f (t)$ framework by using 31 measurements from CC datasets, 1048 measurements of type Ia Supernovae (SNeIa) and 17 uncorrelated BAO measurements using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We obtained the best fit value of our model parameter and obtain the cosmological parameters of our model and analysis cosmographic studies of model. The statistical analysis revealed that our model is supported by the current Universe.

Keywords:

AMSC: 85A40, 83F05, 83-10

References

1. G.-Z. Kang, D.-S. Zhang, L. Jun and H.-S. Zong , Fine tuning problem of the cosmological constant in a generalized Randall–Sundrum model, Chin. Phys. C 44(12) (2020) 125102. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. I. Zlatev, L. Wang and P. J. Steinhardt , Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82(5) (1999) 896. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. R.-J. Yang , New types of $f (t)$ gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 71(11) (2011) 1–8. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. C. Salvatore et al., Extended theories of gravity, Phys. Rep. 509 (2011) 167–321. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa , $f (r)$ theories, Living Rev. Relat. 13(1) (2010) 1–161. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni , $f (r)$ theories of gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(1) (2010) 451. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. S. Capozziello and M. Francaviglia , Extended theories of gravity and their cosmological and astrophysical applications, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40(2) (2008) 357–420. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. A. Silvestri and M. Trodden , Approaches to understanding cosmic acceleration, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72(9) (2009) 096901. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov , Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 4(1) (2007) 115–145. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. G. R. Bengochea and R. Ferraro , Dark torsion as the cosmic speed-up, Phys. Rev. D 79(12) (2009) 124019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini , Born–Infeld gravity in Weitzenböck spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 78(12) (2008) 124019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini , Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without an inflaton, Phys. Rev. D 75(8) (2007) 084031. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. R.-J. Yang , Conformal transformation in $f (t)$ theories, Europhys. Lett. 93(6) (2011) 60001. Crossref, Google Scholar
14. B. Li, T. P. Sotiriou and J. D. Barrow , Large-scale structure in $f (t)$ gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83(10) (2011) 104017. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. S.-H. Chen, J. B. Dent, S. Dutta and E. N. Saridakis , Cosmological perturbations in $f (t)$ gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83(2) (2011) 023508. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. W. Zhang, C. Cheng, Q. Huang, M. Li, S. Li, X. Li and S. Wang , Testing modified gravity models with recent cosmological observations, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 55(12) (2012) 2244–2258. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Y.-F. Cai, S.-H. Chen, J. Dent, S. Dutta and E. N. Saridakis , Class. Quantum Grav. 28 (2011) 215011. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. T. Wang , Static solutions with spherical symmetry in $f (t)$ theories, Phys. Rev. D 84(2) (2011) 024042. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. X.-h. Meng and Y.-b. Wang , Birkhoff’s theorem in $f (t)$ gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 71(9) (2011) 1–6. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. C. Deliduman and B. Yapiskan, Absence of relativistic stars in $f (t)$ gravity, preprint (2011), arXiv:1103.2225. Google Scholar
21. S. Capozziello, V. Cardone, H. Farajollahi and A. Ravanpak , Cosmography in $f (t)$ gravity, Phys. Rev. D 84(4) (2011) 043527. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. B. Li, T. P. Sotiriou and J. D. Barrow , $f (t)$ gravity and local lorentz invariance, Phys. Rev. D 83(6) (2011) 064035. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. T. P. Sotiriou, B. Li and J. D. Barrow , Generalizations of teleparallel gravity and local lorentz symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 83(10) (2011) 104030. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. R. K. Tiwari, D. Sofuoğlu and A. Beesham , FRW universe in $f (r, t)$ gravity, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 18(7) (2021) 2150104. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. R. K. Tiwari, D. Sofuoğlu and V. Dubey , Phase transition of LRS Bianchi type-I cosmological model in $f (r, t)$ gravity, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 17(12) (2020) 2050187. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. R. K. Tiwari, A. Beesham, S. Mishra and V. Dubey , Anisotropic cosmological model in a modified theory of gravitation, Universe 7(7) (2021) 226. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. M. Jamil, D. Momeni and R. Myrzakulov , Attractor solutions in $f (t)$ cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C 72(3) (2012) 1–10. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. A. Shafieloo, A. G. Kim and E. V. Linder , Model independent tests of cosmic growth versus expansion, Phys. Rev. D 87(2) (2013) 023520. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. R. K. Tiwari, A. Beesham and B. Shukla , Cosmological model with variable deceleration parameter in $f (r, t)$ modified gravity, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 15(7) (2018) 1850115. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. D. Sofuoğlu, R. K. Tiwari, A. Abebe, A. H. A. Alfedeel and I. H. Eltegani , The cosmology of a non-minimally coupled $f (R, T)$ gravitation, Physics 4 (2022) 1348–1358. Crossref, Google Scholar
31. R. K. Tiwari, B. K. Tiwari, D. Sofuoğlu, D. Kösem , A transition model in $f (R, T)$ theory via observational constraints, Symmetry 15 (2023) 788. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang and J. Goodman , emcee: The MCMC hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125(925) (2013) 306. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. A. Lewis, Getdist: A python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples, preprint (2019), arXiv:1910.13970. Google Scholar
34. R. Jimenez and A. Loeb , Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages, Astrophys. J. 573(1) (2002) 37. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. A. Bouali, I. Albarran, M. Bouhmadi-López and T. Ouali , Cosmological constraints of phantom dark energy models, Phys. Dark Universe 26 (2019) 100391. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. D. M. Scolnic et al., The complete light-curve sample of spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and cosmological constraints from the combined pantheon sample, Astrophys. J. 859(2) (2018) 101. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. A. Conley et al., Supernova constraints and systematic uncertainties from the first three years of the supernova legacy survey, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192(1) (2010) 1. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. D. Benisty and D. Staicova , Testing late-time cosmic acceleration with uncorrelated baryon acoustic oscillation dataset, Astron. Astrophys. 647 (2021) A38. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. F. Beutler et al., The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Fourier space, Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc. 464(3) (2017) 3409–3430. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden and M. Manera , The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main galaxy sample-I. A 4 per cent distance measure at $z = 0.15$ , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 449(1) (2015) 835–847. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. L. L. Honorez, B. A. Reid, O. Mena, L. Verde and R. Jimenez , Coupled dark matter–dark energy in light of near universe observations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010(9) (2010) 29. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. R. Tojeiro et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Galaxy clustering measurements in the low-redshift sample of data release 11, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 440(3) (2014) 2222–2237. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. H.-J. Seo et al., Acoustic scale from the angular power spectra of SDSS-III DR8 photometric luminous galaxies, Astrophys. J. 761(1) (2012) 13. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. L. Anderson et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Baryon acoustic oscillations in the data release 9 spectroscopic galaxy sample, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 427(4) (2012) 3435–3467. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. S. Sridhar, Y.-S. Song, A. J. Ross, R. Zhou, J. A. Newman, C.-H. Chuang, R. Blum, E. Gaztanaga, M. Landriau and F. Prada , Clustering of LRGs in the DECaLS DR8 footprint: Distance constraints from baryon acoustic oscillations using photometric redshifts, Astrophys. J. 904(1) (2020) 69. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
46. J. E. Bautista et al., The SDSS-IV extended baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Baryon acoustic oscillations at redshift of $0.72$ with the DR14 luminous red galaxy sample, Astrophys. J. 863(1) (2018) 110. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
47. T. Abbott et al., Dark energy survey year 1 results: Measurement of the baryon acoustic oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483(4) (2019) 4866–4883. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
48. J. Hou et al., The completed SDSS-IV extended baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: BAO and RSD measurements from anisotropic clustering analysis of the quasar sample in configuration space between redshift $0.8$ and 2.2, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500(1) (2021) 1201–1221. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
49. M. Ata et al., The clustering of the SDSS-IV extended baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey DR14 quasar sample: First measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations between redshift $0.8$ and 2.2, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473(4) (2018) 4773–4794. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
50. A. Heinesen, C. Blake and D. L. Wiltshire , Quantifying the accuracy of the Alcock–Paczyński scaling of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020(1) (2020) 038. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. V. de Sainte Agathe et al., Baryon acoustic oscillations at $z = 2.34$ from the correlations of Ly $α$ absorption in eBOSS DR14, Astron. Astrophys. 629 (2019) A85. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
52. C. Blake et al., The WiggleZ dark energy survey: Joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at $z_{i} 1$ , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425(1) (2012) 405–414. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53. V. Sahni, T. D. Saini, A. A. Starobinsky and U. Alam, et al., JETP Lett. 77 (2003) 201; U. Alam et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344 (2003) 1057. Google Scholar