PapersNo Access

RECURRENCE QUANTIFICATION ANALYSIS: INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

Search for more papers by this author

and

CHARLES L. WEBBER, JR.

Department of Physiology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S. First Street, Maywood, IL 60150, USA

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127407019238Cited by:34 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Although chaotic systems continue to gain interest, their confirmation and analysis can be difficult. Traditional analytic methods impose constraints which are often difficult to achieve. A technique which does not impose these constraints is recurrence quantification analysis. Recurrence quantification is derived from recurrence plots, which are based upon distances matrices of embedded series. The original article demonstrated the plot's ability to uncover deterministic processes, as well as drift and nonstationarity. Recurrence quantification has allowed for direct quantification of these features.

Keywords:

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!
Check out our Bifurcation & Chaos

References

J. M. Choi, B. H. Bae and S. Y. Kim, Phys. Lett. A 263, 299 (1999), DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00751-3. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. W. Cooley and J. W. Tukey, Math. Comput. 19, 297 (1965). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. P. Eckmann, S. O. Kamphorst and D. Ruelle, Europhys. Lett. 4, 324 (1987), DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/4/9/004. Google Scholar
D. Fearnley-Sander, Amer. Math. Monthly 86, 809 (1979), DOI: 10.2307/2320145. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. Gao and H. Cai, Phys. Lett. A 270, 75 (2000), DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00304-2. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. L. Goldbergeret al., Physica D 19, 282 (1986), DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(86)90024-2. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
P. Grassberger, T. Schreiber and C. Schaffrath, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 1, 521 (1991). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. H. Koslow , A. J. Mandell and M. F. Shlesinger (eds.) , Perspectives in Biological Dynamics and Theoretical Medicine ( New York Academy of Sciences , New York , 1987 ) . Google Scholar
H. Luczak and W. J. Lauring, Ergonomics 16, 85 (1973), DOI: 10.1080/00140137308924484. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
N. Marwanet al., Phys. Rev. E 66, 026702-1 (2002), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.026702. Web of Science, Google Scholar
D. Ruelle and J.-P. Eckmann, Physica D 56, 185 (1992). Google Scholar
D. Ruelle, Physics Today 24 (1994), DOI: 10.1063/1.881395. Google Scholar
B. M. Sayers, Ergonomics 16, 17 (1973). Web of Science, Google Scholar
C. L. Webber Jr. and J. P. Zbilut, J. Appl. Physiol. 76, 965 (1994). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. P. Zbilut and G. Mayer-Kress, Math. Biosci. 90, 49 (1988), DOI: 10.1016/0025-5564(88)90057-0. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. P. Zbilutet al., Use of recurrence plots in the analysis of heart beat intervals, Proc. IEEE Conf. Computers in Cardiology, Chicago 1990 (IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991) pp. 263–266. Google Scholar
J. P. Zbilut and C. L. Webber Jr., Phys. Lett. A 171, 199 (1992), DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(92)90426-M. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. P. Zbilut, N. Thomasson and C. L. Webber Jr., Med. Eng. Phys. 24, 53 (2002), DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00112-6. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar