Narrow Results

The purpose of this paper is to compare the design equation of Allowable Stress Design (ASD) with that of Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) concerning the member stability for the economic design of cable-stayed bridges. Both elastic and inelastic buckling analyses are carried out for the cable-stayed bridges with the effective buckling lengths of the key members calculated. The axial-flexural interaction equations prescribed in ASD and LRFD are used to check the stability of main members in cable-stayed bridges. Parametric studies are performed for the bridges with a center span of 300, 600, 900, and 1200 m of different girder depths. Peak values of the interaction equations are calculated at the intersection between the girder and towers. Since the peak values of the interaction equations by inelastic buckling analysis are less than those by elastic buckling analysis, a more economical design of the girder and towers can be achieved using the inelastic buckling analysis. In addition, the use of LRFD specifications can result in a more economical design by about 20% on average than the ASD specifications for steel cable-stayed bridges.