Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    Numerical Investigation into the Stress Evolution and Failure Mechanism of Deep-Buried Hard Rock Under Blasting Loads

    With the production activities continue progressing into deeper underground spaces, the rising ground stress poses new challenges in the fracturing of hard rock. Previous research mostly focused on the outer actions of blasting on conventional rock mass, while research on the inner actions of blasting via discrete element method (DEM) is relatively scarce, especially for deep-buried hard rocks under high ground stress. Relying on the pre-cracking project of hard rock protective layer in the thousand-meter deep well of Pingdingshan coal mine, this paper aims to numerically investigate the fracture mechanism of deep-buried hard rock under blasting loads via DEM. To this end, the algorithm of simulating explosion load is improved. The improved algorithm ensures a more reliable correspondence between numerical results and engineering practice, significantly enhancing the accuracy and credibility of calculations. After the calibration of mesoscopic parameters on the basis of laboratory tests, a series of parametric study, including confining pressure, peak blast stress and lateral stress coefficient, have been performed to understand the effects of in-situ stress on the behaviors of rock blasting. The obtained numerical results exhibit that confining pressure inhibits the fracture growth: under low confining pressure, confining pressure mainly inhibits the development of fractures in sparsely fractured zone while the crack growth in densely fractured zone and crushed zone is also inhibited under high confining pressure. According to the stress state, hoop peak stress is more sensitive to confining pressure than radial peak stress. Rock breakage in the vicinity of blasthole is essentially controlled by the radial peak stress, while crack propagation in the far-field is mainly induced by the hoop peak stress. With different lateral stress coefficients, the failure characteristics of rock mass are principally related to the hoop stresses in the vertical direction. The obtained numerical results and mesoscopic analysis are capable of providing new insights into the fracturing mechanism of deep-buried hard rock.

  • articleNo Access

    PATTERN RECOGNITION OF MINE MICROSEISMIC AND BLASTING EVENTS BASED ON WAVE FRACTAL FEATURES

    Fractals01 Jun 2018

    A microseismic (MS) monitoring system in a mine can monitor the MS signals generated by coal rock rupture and blasting waves and can distinguish the two types of waves more clearly to monitor and analyze the rupture and evolution process of coal rock. According to the nonlinearity characteristics of the waveform, the fractal characteristics of a mine’s MS and blasting waves are analyzed by simple fractal and multifractal theory, and the simple fractal dimension D and multifractal parameters are obtained, respectively. Results show that the simple fractal dimension D reflects the complexity and frequency structure of the wave. The simple fractal dimension D of a blasting wave is larger than that of a mine MS wave, which indicates that the blasting wave is relatively complex with higher frequency, while the mine MS wave is relatively simple with lower frequency. However, the simple fractal dimension D can only describe the wave integrity features, not the local features. The multifractal parameters can describe the local characteristics of the wave more finely, and the multifractal spectrum describes the probability information of the singularity exponent a. The singularity exponential range and multifractal spectral width Δα of the blasting wave are smaller than those of the mine MS wave, which indicates that the probability measure of distribution unevenness and the degree of partial parameter fluctuation of the blasting wave are more severe than those of the mine MS wave. Wave signal analysis based on simple fractal and multifractal methods can not only obtain the characteristics of the wave strength and spectral structure but also other important information, such as local singularity. Therefore, it is possible to more clearly and conspicuously identify mine MS and blasting waves, so that coal rock rupture can be monitored more accurately.