Please login to be able to save your searches and receive alerts for new content matching your search criteria.
Given (M,g) a smooth compact Riemannian manifold of dimension n ≥ 5, we investigate compactness for fourth order critical equations like Pgu = u2♯-1, where is a Paneitz–Branson operator with constant coefficients b and c, u is required to be positive, and
is critical from the Sobolev viewpoint. We prove that such equations are compact on locally conformally flat manifolds, unless b lies in some closed interval associated to the spectrum of the smooth symmetric (2,0)-tensor field involved in the definition of the geometric Paneitz–Branson operator.
We study the Dirichlet boundary value problem on a bounded domain Ω ⊂ ℝN. For 2 ≤ N ≤ 7, we characterize compactness for solutions sequence in terms of spectral informations. As a by-product, we give an uniqueness result for λ close to 0 and λ* in the class of all solutions with finite Morse index, λ* being the extremal value associated to the nonlinear eigenvalue problem.
In this paper, we obtain gradient continuity estimates for viscosity solutions of ΔNpu=f in terms of the scaling critical L(n,1)-norm of f, where ΔNp is the normalized p-Laplacian operator. Our main result corresponds to the borderline gradient continuity estimate in terms of the modified Riesz potential ̃𝕀fq. Moreover, for f∈Lm with m>n, we also obtain C1,α estimates. This improves one of the regularity results in [A. Attouchi, M. Parviainen and E. Ruosteenoja, C1,α regularity for the normalized p-Poisson problem, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 108(4) (2017) 553–591], where a C1,α estimate was established depending on the Lm-norm of f under the additional restriction that p>2 and m>max(2,n,p2). We also mention that differently from the approach in the above paper, which uses methods from divergence form theory and nonlinear potential theory, the method in this paper is more non-variational in nature, and it is based on separation of phases inspired by the ideas in [L. Wang, Compactness methods for certain degenerate elliptic equations, J. Differential Equations 107(2) (1994) 341–350]. Moreover, for f continuous, our approach also gives a somewhat different proof of the C1,α regularity result.
We build blowing-up solutions for a supercritical perturbation of the Yamabe problem on manifolds with boundary, provided the dimension of the manifold is n≥7 and the trace-free part of the second fundamental form is nonzero everywhere on the boundary.
For a conformally compact Poincaré–Einstein manifold (X,g+), we consider two types of compactifications for it. One is ḡ=ρ2g+, where ρ is a fixed smooth defining function; the other is the adapted (including Fefferman–Graham) compactification ḡs=ρ2sg+ with a continuous parameter s>n2. In this paper, we mainly prove that for a set of conformally compact Poincaré–Einstein manifolds {(X,g(i)+)} with conformal infinity of positive Yamabe type, {ḡ(i)} is compact in Ck,α(¯X) topology if and only if {ḡ(i)s} is compact in some Cl,β(¯X) topology, provided that ḡ(i)|TM=ḡ(i)s|TM=ĝ(i) and ĝ(i) has positive scalar curvature for each i. See Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.1 for the exact relation of (k,α) and (l,β).
In this paper, we study the rank-one convex hull of a differential inclusion associated to entropy solutions of a hyperbolic system of conservation laws. This was introduced in [B. Kirchheim, S. Müller and V. Šverák, Studying Nonlinear PDE by Geometry in Matrix Space (Springer, 2003), Sec. 7], and many of its properties have already been shown in [A. Lorent and G. Peng, Null Lagrangian measures in subspaces, compensated compactness and conservation laws, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 234(2) (2019) 857–910; A. Lorent and G. Peng, On the Rank-1 convex hull of a set arising from a hyperbolic system of Lagrangian elasticity, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59(5) (2020) 156]. In particular, in [A. Lorent and G. Peng, On the Rank-1 convex hull of a set arising from a hyperbolic system of Lagrangian elasticity, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59(5) (2020) 156], it is shown that the differential inclusion does not contain any T4 configurations. Here, we continue that study by showing that the differential inclusion does not contain T5 configurations.