Narrow Results

Purpose: Back muscles' endurance assessment provides an objective indicator of the functional capacity of the back. This study sought to establish a gender and age referenced normative data for back muscles endurance for a Sub-Saharan African population. Methods: This cross sectional study involved 1253 (623 male, 630 female) consecutive participants between the ages of 11 and 69 years without a history of symptomatic LBP within one year to the time of the study. Participants were recruited from eight secondary schools, two universities and two teaching hospitals, respectively. All participants underwent assessment of the back extensor muscles' endurance using the modified Biering-Sorensen test of muscular endurance. The mean and percentile data for endurance time were determined for six gender/age groups classified on a range of 10 years. Results: The mean endurance time (ET) of all the participants was 119 ± 53.6 secs. Men exhibited a significantly (p = 0.001) higher ET than women (125.9 ± 53.3 versus 112.6 ± 53.1 secs). Using percentile values cut-points; poor endurance (less than 25th), moderate endurance (25–75th) and good endurance (> 75th percentile) were < 85.0 secs, 85–163 secs, and > 163 secs, respectively for male; and < 69.8 secs, 69.8–148 secs and > 148 secs, respectively for female. Conclusion: The normative values derived in this study would be useful in assessing impairment in back muscles' endurance in both healthy and patient populations. The results suggest that age, gender and anthropometric factors can significantly influence back muscles' endurance.

Purpose: This study aims to determine the relation among the commonly used different tests of evaluating core stability performance. Establishing this relationship is important as different authors have used different types of tests for evaluating core stabilization in their study yet relation among these tests and the individual importance of each of these tests is not clearly established so far. Methods: Among 40 recreationally active subjects the core stability performance was evaluated using variety of different tests reported in the previous literatures. Results: Results show that there was no significant correlation among the performance scores on different test of core stability. Conclusions: The assessment of the core stability performance must be in concordance with the need of the individual and of the study. Also, different tasks or sports selectively require different components of the core stability. In order to evaluate more than one component of the core stability performance, the different combinations of the tests must be used. If one wishes to test all the components of the core stabilization, then no single test is sufficient and a battery of test must be used to assess different components separately.

Reduced shoulder endurance in rotator cuff tear patients has been observed clinically. A simple and inexpensive shoulder endurance test protocol was developed. This study reports the test-retest reliability of the protocol. Twenty healthy volunteers without a history of shoulder pathology participated in the study. Each subject was tested twice, each on a separate day. Test-retest correlation coefficients of the arm endurance times were 0.59 and 0.60 for the dominant and nondominant sides, respectively. The protocol appears promising for assessing shoulder function.