Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

Bestsellers

Compendium on Electromagnetic Analysis
Compendium on Electromagnetic Analysis

(In 5 Volumes)
Editor-in-chief: Igor Tsukerman
Encyclopedia of Packaging Materials, Processes, and Mechanics
Encyclopedia of Packaging Materials, Processes, and Mechanics

(In 4 Volumes)
Editor-in-chief: Avram Bar-Cohen, Jeffrey C Suhling and Andrew A O Tay
Explosive Ferroelectric Generators
Explosive Ferroelectric Generators

From Physical Principles to Engineering
by Sergey I Shkuratov

 

  • articleNo Access

    Multi-Objective Controller Failure Aware Capacitated Controller Placement in Software-Defined Networks

    Software-Defined Networking disassociates the control plane from data plane. The problem of deciding upon the number and locations of controllers and assigning switches to them has attracted the attention of researchers. Foreseeing the possibility of failure of a controller, a backup controller has to be maintained for each switch so that the switches assigned to the failed controller can immediately be connected to their backup controllers. Hence, the switches cannot experience disconnections in case of failure of their controller. In this paper, two mathematical models are proposed. The first model focuses on minimizing the average of latencies from all switches to their backup controllers while considering the failure of the controllers. The second model aims at minimizing both the average and worst-case of latencies from all switches to the corresponding backup controllers. Both of our models are evaluated on three networks and are compared (in terms of two metrics, viz., average and worst-case latencies) with an existing model that focuses on minimizing only worst-case latency. The first model gives better average latency compared to the reference model. The second model also gives better average latency and almost equal worst-case latency compared to the reference model.