Please login to be able to save your searches and receive alerts for new content matching your search criteria.
We provide a new way of hedging a commodity exposure which eliminates downside risk without sacrificing upside potential. The tool used is a variant on the equity passport option and can be used with both futures and forwards contracts as the underlying hedge instrument. Results are given for popular commodity price models such as Gibson-Schwartz and Black with convenience yield. Two different scenarios are considered, one where the producer places his usual hedge and undertakes additional trading, and the other where the usual hedge is not held. In addition, a comparison result is derived showing that one scenario is always more expensive than the other. The cost of these methods are compared to buying a put option on the commodity.
This paper extends and refines the Jarrow et al. (2006, 2008) arbitrage free pricing theory for bubbles to characterize forward and futures prices. Some new insights are obtained in this regard. In particular, we: (i) provide a canonical process for asset price bubbles suitable for empirical estimation, (ii) discuss new methods to test empirically for asset price bubbles using both spot prices and call/put option prices on the spot commodity, (iii) show that futures prices can have bubbles independent of the underlying asset's price bubble, (iv) relate forward and futures prices under bubbles, and (v) relate price options on futures with asset price bubbles.
We study the problem of dynamically trading futures in continuous time under a multifactor Gaussian framework. We present a utility maximization approach to determine the optimal futures trading strategy. This leads to the explicit solution to the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equations. We apply our stochastic framework to two-factor models, namely, the Schwartz model and Central Tendency Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (CTOU) model. We also develop a multiscale CTOU model, which has a fast mean-reverting and a slow mean-reverting factor in the spot asset price dynamics. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the investor’s optimal positions for different futures portfolios.
As interest rate benchmarks move from LIBOR to overnight risk-free rates (RFR), it has become increasingly important for models to accurately capture the interest rate dynamics at the overnight tenor. Overnight rates closely track central bank policy rate decisions resulting, in highly discontinuous dynamics around scheduled meeting dates. In this paper, we construct a dynamic term structure model, which accounts for the discontinuous short-rate dynamics. We show that the model is able to jointly fit the overnight US policy rate, secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) and SOFR futures rates through the recent Fed hiking cycle. Comparing our model with a standard continuous time-homogeneous short-rate model, we find several indications that our model avoids the clear misspecification of the continuous model, in particular with regard to the short-rate dynamics around meeting dates of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Thiseffect begins to disappear as the term of the rates under consideration is increased, suggesting that diffusive dynamics are a reasonably accurate reflection of the evolution of market expectations embodied in longer-term interest rates.
We study a series of static and dynamic portfolios of Volatility Index (VIX) futures and their effectiveness to track the VIX. We derive each portfolio using optimization methods, and evaluate its tracking performance from both empirical and theoretical perspectives. Among our results, we show that static portfolios of different VIX futures fail to track VIX closely. VIX futures simply do not react quickly enough to movements in the spot VIX. In a discrete-time model, we design and implement a dynamic trading strategy that adjusts daily to optimally track VIX. The model is calibrated to historical data and a simulation study is performed to understand the properties exhibited by the strategy. In addition, compared to the volatility ETN, VXX, we find that our dynamic strategy has a superior tracking performance.