Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

Bestsellers

Advanced Calculus
Advanced Calculus

Revised Edition
by Lynn Harold Loomis and Shlomo Sternberg

 

  • chapterNo Access

    On ideal theory for lattices

    Historically ideal theory for lattices was developed by Hashimoto. He established that there is a one to one correspondence between ideals and congruence relations of a lattice L under which the ideal corresponding to a congruence relation is a whole congruence class under it if and only if L is a generalized Boolean algebra. His proof involved topological ideas which were later simplified, using lattice theoretic ideas, by Gratzer and Schmidt. Also Gratzer introduced the notion of standard elements and ideals in lattices which were extensively studied by Gratzer and Schmidt. It was shown that standard ideals of lattices play a role somewhat similar to that of normal subgroups of groups or ideals of rings. Later, Fried and Schmidt extended the notion of standard ideals of lattices to convex sublattices. Generalizations of some of these results to trellises (or also called weakly associative lattices) may be found in Bhatta and Ramananda and Shashirekha.