Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    BIOPHYSICAL AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS OF MULTIPLE SPIKE INTERACTIONS IN SPIKE-TIMING DEPENDENT PLASTICITY

    Spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) is a form of associative synaptic modification which depends on the respective timing of pre- and post-synaptic spikes. The biophysical mechanisms underlying this form of plasticity are currently not known. We present here a biophysical model which captures the characteristics of STDP, such as its frequency dependency, and the effects of spike pair or spike triplet interactions. We also make links with other well-known plasticity rules. A simplified phenomenological model is also derived, which should be useful for fast numerical simulation and analytical investigation of the impact of STDP at the network level.

  • articleNo Access

    EMERGENCE OF PREFERRED FIRING SEQUENCES IN LARGE SPIKING NEURAL NETWORKS DURING SIMULATED NEURONAL DEVELOPMENT

    Two main processes concurrently refine the nervous system over the course of development: cell death and selective synaptic pruning. We simulated large spiking neural networks (100 × 100 neurons "at birth") characterized by an early developmental phase with cell death due to excessive firing rate, followed by the onset of spike timing dependent synaptic plasticity (STDP), driven by spatiotemporal patterns of stimulation. The cell death affected the inhibitory units more than the excitatory units during the early developmental phase. The network activity showed the appearance of recurrent spatiotemporal firing patterns along the STDP phase, thus suggesting the emergence of cell assemblies from the initially randomly connected networks. Some of these patterns were detected throughout the simulation despite the activity-driven network modifications while others disappeared.

  • articleNo Access

    AN STDP TRAINING ALGORITHM FOR A SPIKING NEURAL NETWORK WITH DYNAMIC THRESHOLD NEURONS

    This paper proposes a supervised training algorithm for Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) which modifies the Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity (STDP)learning rule to support both local and network level training with multiple synaptic connections and axonal delays. The training algorithm applies the rule to two and three layer SNNs, and is benchmarked using the Iris and Wisconsin Breast Cancer (WBC) data sets. The effectiveness of hidden layer dynamic threshold neurons is also investigated and results are presented.

  • articleNo Access

    ADAPTIVE CEREBELLAR SPIKING MODEL EMBEDDED IN THE CONTROL LOOP: CONTEXT SWITCHING AND ROBUSTNESS AGAINST NOISE

    This work evaluates the capability of a spiking cerebellar model embedded in different loop architectures (recurrent, forward, and forward&recurrent) to control a robotic arm (three degrees of freedom) using a biologically-inspired approach. The implemented spiking network relies on synaptic plasticity (long-term potentiation and long-term depression) to adapt and cope with perturbations in the manipulation scenario: changes in dynamics and kinematics of the simulated robot. Furthermore, the effect of several degrees of noise in the cerebellar input pathway (mossy fibers) was assessed depending on the employed control architecture. The implemented cerebellar model managed to adapt in the three control architectures to different dynamics and kinematics providing corrective actions for more accurate movements. According to the obtained results, coupling both control architectures (forward&recurrent) provides benefits of the two of them and leads to a higher robustness against noise.

  • articleNo Access

    Phase Selective Oscillations in Two Noise Driven Synaptically Coupled Spiking Neurons

    The work investigates the influence of spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) mechanisms on the dynamics of two synaptically coupled neurons driven by additive external noise. In this setting, the noise signal models synaptic inputs that the pair receives from other neurons in a larger network. We show that in the absence of STDP feedbacks the pair of neurons exhibit oscillations and intermittent synchronization. When the synapse connecting the neurons is supplied with a phase selective feedback mechanism simulating STDP, induced dynamics of spikes in the coupled system resembles a phase locked mode with time lags between spikes oscillating about a specific value. This value, as we show by extensive numerical simulations, can be set arbitrary within a broad interval by tuning parameters of the STDP feedback.

  • chapterNo Access

    Learning Bidirectional Connections Between Areas With Standard Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

    Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is a learning algorithm that is simple, biologically plausible, and powerful. Hence, one would expect STDP (likely in combination with other learning algorithms) to be a key component in cortical models of higher cognitive functions, such as language comprehension or production. Such models would need to involve multiple brain areas and bidirectional links between representations in those different areas. However, STDP is an asymmetrical learning algorithm (in contrast to classical Hebbian learning, which is symmetrical). This makes the acquisition of bilateral connections between two neurons almost impossible and bilateral connections between representations very challenging. Here, we propose a solution based on specific connectivity patterns. Then, using numerical simulations, we show that our approach allows STDP to create strong bidirectional links between representations. Finally, we compare our architecture to neuroanatomical data.