Narrow Results

The primary goal of software quality engineering is to produce a high quality software product through the use of some specific techniques and processes. One strategy is applying data mining techniques to software metric and defect data collected during the software development process to identify potential low-quality program modules. In this paper, we investigate the use of feature selection in the context of software quality estimation (also referred to as software defect prediction), where a classification model is used to predict whether program modules (instances) are fault-prone or not-fault-prone. Seven filter-based feature ranking techniques are examined. Among them, six are commonly used, and the other one, named signal to noise ratio (SNR), is rarely employed. The objective of the paper is to compare these seven techniques for various software data sets and assess their effectiveness for software quality modeling. A case study is performed on 16 software data sets, and classification models are built with five different learners and evaluated with two performance metrics. Our experimental results are summarized based on statistical tests for significance. The main conclusion is that the SNR technique performs as well as the best performer of the six commonly used techniques.

Software defect prediction models that use software metrics such as code-level measurements and defect data to build classification models are useful tools for identifying potentially-problematic program modules. Effectiveness of detecting such modules is affected by the software measurements used, making data preprocessing an important step during software quality prediction. Generally, there are two problems affecting software measurement data: high dimensionality (where a training dataset has an extremely large number of independent attributes, or features) and class imbalance (where a training dataset has one class with relatively many more members than the other class). In this paper, we present a novel form of ensemble learning based on boosting that incorporates data sampling to alleviate class imbalance and feature (software metric) selection to address high dimensionality. As we adopt two different sampling methods (Random Undersampling (RUS) and Synthetic Minority Oversampling (SMOTE)) in the technique, we have two forms of our new ensemble-based approach: selectRUSBoost and selectSMOTEBoost. To evaluate the effectiveness of these new techniques, we apply them to two groups of datasets from two real-world software systems. In the experiments, four learners and nine feature selection techniques are employed to build our models. We also consider versions of the technique which do not incorporate feature selection, and compare all four techniques (the two different ensemble-based approaches which utilize feature selection and the two versions which use sampling only). The experimental results demonstrate that selectRUSBoost is generally more effective in improving defect prediction performance than selectSMOTEBoost, and that the techniques with feature selection do help for getting better prediction than the techniques without feature selection.

The basic measurements for software quality control and management are the various project and software metrics collected at various states of a software development life cycle. The software metrics may not all be relevant for predicting the fault proneness of software components, modules, or releases. Thus creating the need for the use of feature (software metric) selection. The goal of feature selection is to find a minimum subset of attributes that can characterize the underlying data with results as well as, or even better than the original data when all available features are considered. As an example of inter-disciplinary research (between data science and software engineering), this study is unique in presenting a large comparative study of wrapper-based feature (or attribute) selection techniques for building defect predictors. In this paper, we investigated thirty wrapper-based feature selection methods to remove irrelevant and redundant software metrics used for building defect predictors. In this study, these thirty wrappers vary based on the choice of search method (Best First or Greedy Stepwise), leaner (Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Logistic Regression), and performance metric (Overall Accuracy, Area Under ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Curve, Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve, Best Geometric Mean, and Best Arithmetic Mean) used in the defect prediction model evaluation process. The models are trained using the three learners and evaluated using the five performance metrics. The case study is based on software metrics and defect data collected from a real world software project.

The results demonstrate that Best Arithmetic Mean is the best performance metric used within the wrapper. Naïve Bayes performed significantly better than Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine as a wrapper learner on slightly and less imbalanced datasets. We also recommend Greedy Stepwise as a search method for wrappers. Moreover, comparing to models built with full datasets, the performances of defect prediction models can be improved when metric subsets are selected through a wrapper subset selector.

Defect prediction is very challenging in software development practice. Classification models are useful tools that can help for such prediction. Classification models can classify program modules into quality-based classes, e.g. fault-prone (fp) or not-fault-prone (nfp). This facilitates the allocation of limited project resources. For example, more resources are assigned to program modules that are of poor quality or likely to have a high number of faults based on the classification. However, two main problems, high dimensionality and class imbalance, affect the quality of training datasets and therefore classification models. Feature selection and data sampling are often used to overcome these problems. Feature selection is a process of choosing the most important attributes from the original dataset. Data sampling alters the dataset to change its balance level. Another technique, called boosting (building multiple models, with each model tuned to work better on instances misclassified by previous models), is found to also be effective for resolving the class imbalance problem.

In this study, we investigate an approach for combining feature selection with this ensemble learning (boosting) process. We focus on two different scenarios: feature selection performed prior to the boosting process and feature selection performed inside the boosting process. Ten individual base feature ranking techniques, as well as an ensemble ranker based on the ten, are examined and compared over the two scenarios. We also employ the boosting algorithm to construct classification models without performing feature selection and use the results as the baseline for further comparison. The experimental results demonstrate that feature selection is important and needed prior to the learning process. In addition, the ensemble feature ranking method generally has better or similar performance than the average of the base ranking techniques, and more importantly, the ensemble method exhibits better robustness than most base ranking techniques. As for the two scenarios, the results show that applying feature selection inside boosting performs better than using feature selection prior to boosting.