Please login to be able to save your searches and receive alerts for new content matching your search criteria.
The wrist and thumb postures adopted during the use of three different types of computer mouse (mini mouse; standard mouse; MouseMan) to perform eight standardized tasks were evaluated. Thirty elementary students between seven to twelve years of age were studied using a magnetic tracking system. The peak value and angular range of motion of the wrist and thumb extension/flexion and radial/ulnar deviation were measured during performing 8 standard tasks. There were statistically significant larger values in the standard mice with regard to extreme wrist extension. Angular range of wrist extension observed for the standard mice were also much higher than the mini mouse and MouseMan. There were statistically significant larger values in the MouseMan with regard to extreme wrist ulnar deviation, and an average decrease in extreme thumb flexion and angular range of thumb flexion. The results from the questionnaire showed that most elementary students preferred to use the standard mouse (40%) next was the MouseMan (37%); and the last the mini mouse (23%). The recommendation of mouse types based on the hand length for elementary students was not statistically significant in our study.
Motion analysis is increasingly used to study the complex kinematics of the musculoskeletal system. In this chapter, both the theory and applications of motion analysis are presented. After the definition of a Cartesian coordinate frame is introduced, a description of transformations between multiple coordinate frames is given; the decomposition of a transformation matrix into anatomical joint motion parameters (e.g. Euler angles) is then explained. Kinematic analysis in musculoskeletal research is illustrated by several examples. The first example describes a reaching-and-grasping task in which mathematical transformations are applied to position the hand with respect to an object during grasping. The second example demonstrates the utility of motion analysis in revealing the coupling motion of the wrist between flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation. The third example shows the application of the motion analysis technique to the study of thumb kinematics, providing insight into the complex movements of thumb joints generated by individual muscles. The last example illustrates the study of knee biomechanics, including a description of knee joint kinematics during functional activities and determination of in situ ligament forces using robotic technology. It is hoped that the theoretical knowledge and biomechanical examples will help readers apply the motion analysis technique to various research problems associated with the musculoskeletal system.