Please login to be able to save your searches and receive alerts for new content matching your search criteria.
We refute a physical model, recently proposed by Gunn, Allison and Abbott (GAA) [http://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.2709v2.pdf], to utilize electromagnetic waves for eavesdropping on the Kirchhoff-law–Johnson-noise (KLJN) secure key distribution. Their model, and its theoretical underpinnings, is found to be fundamentally flawed because their assumption of electromagnetic waves violates not only the wave equation but also the second law of thermodynamics, the principle of detailed balance, Boltzmann’s energy equipartition theorem, and Planck’s formula by implying infinitely strong blackbody radiation. We deduce the correct mathematical model of the GAA scheme, which is based on impedances at the quasi-static limit. Mathematical analysis and simulation results confirm our approach and prove that GAA’s experimental interpretation is incorrect too.
In complex scalar fields, singularities of the phase (optical vortices, wavefront dislocations) are lines in space, or points in the plane, where the wave amplitude vanishes. Phase singularities are illustrated by zeros in edge diffraction and amphidromies in the heights of the tides. In complex vector waves, there are two sorts of polarization singularity. The polarization is purely circular on lines in space or points in the plane (C singularities); these singularities have index ±1/2. The polarization is purely linear on lines in space for general vector fields, and surfaces in space or lines in the plane for transverse fields (L singularities); these singularities have index ±1. Polarization singularities (C points and L lines) are illustrated in the pattern of tidal currents.
Some twenty ultrasonic wave gages were employed to measure the water surface level as well as the bottom sand level near the shoreline in the field. Obtained data during a storm reveals that the long period waves were really dominant in and just outside the swash zone. It is also shown that the long waves provided the swash oscillation in the form of the loop by standing waves. In addition, data recorded for different conditions of beach slopes and incident waves are also presented for comparison with some analysis.
This study aims at improving the computation of the wave-driven longshore currents in the surf zone. The vertical distribution of wave-driven currents often deviates from a logarithmic vertical distribution, due to the vertical mixing induced by wave breaking. 3D modeling of these currents provides the opportunity to take this vertical variation into account. The current method of computing the bed shear stress in the 3D approach of Delft3D is dependent on the thickness of the near-bed vertical computational layer: the thinner this layer, the larger the bed shear stress and the smaller the wave-driven longshore currents. Computing the bed shear stress using the velocity at the edge of the wave boundary layer avoids this layer dependency. With this method good agreement with measured velocity data from laboratory experiments and field experiments is obtained, except for very close to the shore. Although Delft3D in 2DH and 3D model have similar skill in simulating longshore currents, the 3D approach is recommended for wave-driven sediment transport related problems as it more realistically represents the cross-shore current and suspended concentration profile.